Bios 2.07 vs old bios (1.03 etc)

X60/X61 series specific matters only.
Post Reply
Message
Author
thibouille27
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 311
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 11:51 am
Location: Brussels, Belgium

Bios 2.07 vs old bios (1.03 etc)

#1 Post by thibouille27 » Sun Mar 11, 2007 4:40 am

Id the power consumption problem only related to wake up after standby or does the laptop consumes more power at all time?

If so, would a go back to 1.03 have any specific problem (except the lack of official support for Vista).

What do I have to earn from going back to these old bioses ?
TP X23 +UBX2 +cdrw
TP X60 +UBX6 +dvdrw slim + floppy + 8cells battery

madana
Freshman Member
Posts: 114
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 10:59 pm
Location: India

Re: Bios 2.07 vs old bios (1.03 etc)

#2 Post by madana » Sun Mar 11, 2007 6:06 am

thibouille27 wrote:Id the power consumption problem only related to wake up after standby or does the laptop consumes more power at all time?
I installed BIOS 2.07 and gave it a thorough test as far as power consumption.

My experience is that, coupled with all other Windows and ThinkPad updates, the new BIOS is:

(1) somewhat better on power consumption than the previous versions -- with 2.07 wattage drops to 5.49W on idling with screen brightness set to 0 and wireless off.

(2) free from the infamous standby/hibernation resume issue when after waking up the computer would consume 2-3W more power than before. Somehow they have fixed it along the line.

So I would rather stay with 2.07. It seems to be better for all intents and purposes.

I hope this helps.
Regards,
Madana

x60s (1704-44U): 1GB, 100GB 5400, WinXP Pro, 8-cell

sugo
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1813
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 11:54 am
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Bios 2.07 vs old bios (1.03 etc)

#3 Post by sugo » Sun Mar 11, 2007 8:53 am

madana wrote:(1) somewhat better on power consumption than the previous versions -- with 2.07 wattage drops to 5.49W on idling with screen brightness set to 0 and wireless off.

(2) free from the infamous standby/hibernation resume issue when after waking up the computer would consume 2-3W more power than before. Somehow they have fixed it along the line.

Did you test the above with 2.06 by chance?
X61

madana
Freshman Member
Posts: 114
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 10:59 pm
Location: India

Re: Bios 2.07 vs old bios (1.03 etc)

#4 Post by madana » Sun Mar 11, 2007 10:00 am

sugo wrote: Did you test the above with 2.06 by chance?
Yes, I did. The standby-resume issue was resolved with 2.06+updates as well, but the wattage is slightly better with 2.07 -- say, by ~ 0.05W.
Regards,
Madana

x60s (1704-44U): 1GB, 100GB 5400, WinXP Pro, 8-cell

smvp6459
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 462
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 11:02 pm
Location: USA

Re: Bios 2.07 vs old bios (1.03 etc)

#5 Post by smvp6459 » Sun Mar 11, 2007 10:37 am

madana wrote: I installed BIOS 2.07 and gave it a thorough test as far as power consumption.
Hey, thanks for the review. I've been sitting on 1.11, waiting for a good BIOS update to come. It will be nice to have the virtualization option and increased memory for graphics.

thibouille27
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 311
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 11:51 am
Location: Brussels, Belgium

#6 Post by thibouille27 » Sun Mar 11, 2007 1:00 pm

Thanks A LOT Madana 8)
TP X23 +UBX2 +cdrw
TP X60 +UBX6 +dvdrw slim + floppy + 8cells battery

madana
Freshman Member
Posts: 114
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 10:59 pm
Location: India

#7 Post by madana » Sun Mar 11, 2007 7:41 pm

There is at least one glitch with 2.07, however, that I have been able to catch so far and which has not been there in the previous BIOS versions.

If I put machine to a standby on either battery or AC with the screen deemed down all the way to "0", then after resume the brightness level is always one notch up at "1", and I have to turn it down manually back to "0".

This is, however, not the case with hibernation, nor with any pre-standby brightness level other than "0".

Harmless but weird. I hope they will fix it in the next BIOS version.
Regards,
Madana

x60s (1704-44U): 1GB, 100GB 5400, WinXP Pro, 8-cell

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Thinkpad X6x Series incl. X6x Tablet”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: E350 and 13 guests