What Are you guys running for Word Processing in Vista

Operating System, Common Application & ThinkPad Utilities Questions...
Post Reply
Message
Author
Kyocera
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 4826
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 8:00 pm
Location: North Carolina, ...in my mind I'm going to Carolina.....
Contact:

What Are you guys running for Word Processing in Vista

#1 Post by Kyocera » Wed Mar 21, 2007 12:46 pm

I have installed Office 2000 /word/excel/powerpoint and it seems to be working fine. Was wondering if anyone else is having issues with theirs. I've been offered to install Office 2007 but don't really like the looks of it, looks kind of bloated to me. :?

jdhurst
Admin
Admin
Posts: 5831
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 6:49 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

#2 Post by jdhurst » Wed Mar 21, 2007 1:07 pm

Office 2000 is fine, but getting rather old. If you don't want Office 2007 (Outlook 2007 is known to wreck HTML mail), then consider Office 2003. I use it and like it. It is huge (1 Gb including cached files for updating) but with today's disks, that is no issue for me. Performance of Office 2003 on a modern machine (as it must be for Vista) is just fine. Office 2003 is compatible with Office 97, 2000, and XP. Office 2007 is not directly compatible because of file format changes.
... JD Hurst

s1148625
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 4:45 pm
Location: West Lafayette, IN
Contact:

#3 Post by s1148625 » Wed Mar 21, 2007 2:35 pm

I thought the same thing about Office 2007, but since I've installed it, I haven't once wanted 2003 back. It's beautiful and elegant, and everything is exactly where it should be.
T420 (4177-CTO): i7-2620M, 14" HD+, 8 GB RAM, 256GB Crucial M4 SSD, nVidia Optimus, Intel 6250+WiMax, BT, Finger, Win7 Pro 64

jdhurst
Admin
Admin
Posts: 5831
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 6:49 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

#4 Post by jdhurst » Wed Mar 21, 2007 2:44 pm

Office 2007 has lobotomized its Outlook brain, and it using Word to render HTML. I don't know what kind of useless, foolish doofus at Microsoft thought up that disaster, but the internet is now fairly full of the problem. Outlook 2003 and prior used IE to render the HTML and it all looks normal.

I have 30,000 emails in my Outlook 2003 pst file going back as far as 1996. (Eudora before that to 1994). The thought of my emails not rendering properly is a bit of a show stopper for me.

How did you view Outlook 2007? Did you have any issues? Or are the "Sky is falling" people overstating things?

Thanks, ... JD Hurst

s1148625
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 4:45 pm
Location: West Lafayette, IN
Contact:

#5 Post by s1148625 » Wed Mar 21, 2007 2:49 pm

I've never liked/used Outlook (in any version)... I'm using Thunderbird, which does have somewhat more limited functionality, but it does everything I need.
T420 (4177-CTO): i7-2620M, 14" HD+, 8 GB RAM, 256GB Crucial M4 SSD, nVidia Optimus, Intel 6250+WiMax, BT, Finger, Win7 Pro 64

warder
Sophomore Member
Posts: 133
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 3:53 pm
Location: Atlanta, USA

#6 Post by warder » Wed Mar 21, 2007 11:50 pm

Office 2007 is great. It runs about half the speed of 2003, had problems handling my PST files which were quite large, and requires a complete re-education since everything has moved a little.

Saying that, it is easier to use - more so for new users I'd say. Once you get the hang of the ribbon logic, things do appear to be filed in a better, more logical manner.

I haven't found a single 'value' thing yet that would make me recommend it over 2003 though, as I could do everything in that that I do here... maybe I'll explore deeper sometime and find something though.
R61, Z60M, T61, T400, E540

Nabeel
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 267
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 3:09 pm
Location: Lower NY

#7 Post by Nabeel » Thu Mar 22, 2007 11:03 am

i'm using 2003 and loving it so far. esp the ribbon. and outlook is grea too...they greatly improved the calander and tasks lists.

i haven't noticed any html rendering problems and i get html formatted emails and newsletters regularly.
T61 7658-CTO
T42 2378-FVU (RIP)

Kyocera
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 4826
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 8:00 pm
Location: North Carolina, ...in my mind I'm going to Carolina.....
Contact:

#8 Post by Kyocera » Thu Mar 22, 2007 5:37 pm

I have never used outlook anywhere but at work, as do most i'm sure, never load it on my machines just use remote desktop to check it now and then. I think I might migrate to 2003 on down the road a little. Some of my customers have mixed feelings about 2007, "have to learn something new again" which some don't like, same with InDesign a lot of people are upgrading to that "under duress" I think.

mybellyisempty
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 432
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 7:34 pm
Location: Springfield, Illinois

#9 Post by mybellyisempty » Thu Mar 22, 2007 6:04 pm

OpenOffice.Org 2.1 or whatever the latest version is.

I dropped MS Office a couple years ago (or whenever OOO 2 came out), didn't want to pay for 2003, and I was tired of pirating.

arni
Sophomore Member
Posts: 244
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2006 6:44 am
Location: Germany

#10 Post by arni » Fri Mar 23, 2007 1:27 am

Currently i'm using Office 2007 but only cause i don't have to spend extra money on it (have msdn). But if you are a power user you get suck for the first 2 weeks as everthing changed (especially finding the right function in the ribbon).

I have two more computers at my office both running Office 2003. But compared to 2007 these are running much faster. Outlook 2007 really is a ressource hog. Don't try it on a slow machine!

zverg
Sophomore Member
Posts: 220
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 4:38 am
Location: Phoenix, Arizona, USA

#11 Post by zverg » Fri Mar 23, 2007 10:08 am

I use Office 2007 at work and on my ThinkPad (MSDN academic alliance through school so I didn't have to pay).. the new presentation mode in PowerPoint was sorely needed, glad to have it now :)

also outlook isn't hugely different but does have a nice look. I like the bar on the right that shows today's appointments, to-dos, etc.

The new visual styles and layouts for documents in Word.. really nice. Oh and OneNote 2007 is crazy upgraded compared to the "old" 2004ish version... but it didn't get the new menu system at all?
--Chris
IBM ThinkPad T42 "2373-9XU" now with 2.0GHz, 2GB RAM, 9600 64M, 14.1", CDRW/DVD, IBM A/B/G, BT, fingerprint reader.
Lenovo ThinkPad X201s 5129-CTO 2.13GHz Core-i7, 4GB RAM, WSXGA LED, 128GB SSD, Centrino Ultimate 6300, etc. Shipping 11 March

Chrispy
Freshman Member
Posts: 86
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 9:08 pm
Location: Greenwood, IN
Contact:

#12 Post by Chrispy » Fri Mar 23, 2007 11:54 pm

Office 2007
Thinkpad X60 12" XGA / 1.66 GHz Core 2 Duo / 1.5 GB DDR2 RAM / 80 GB 5,400 RPM HDD / Win XP Pro SP2

Temetka
Senior ThinkPadder
Senior ThinkPadder
Posts: 2790
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 3:27 am
Location: Glendora, CA

#13 Post by Temetka » Sat Mar 24, 2007 12:15 am

I am running Office 2003. ITT gave me 3 copies of it (full legal disks). Runs great. To be honest though, if I could find my Office 97 and Outlook 98 disks, I would run it. Office 2000, XP, 2003 et al...didn't seem to add new features, just new ways of doing things.

While for some people that's fine, but if it ain't broke....
New:
Thinkpad T430s 8GB DDR3, 1600x900, 128GB + 250GB SSD's, etc.
Old:
E6520, Precision M4400, D630, Latitude E6520
ThinkPad Tablet 16GB 1838-22U
IBM Thinkpad X61T, T61, T43, X41T, T60, T41P, T42, T410, X301

Aroc
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 330
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Solon, OH, USA

#14 Post by Aroc » Sat Mar 24, 2007 11:21 am

Word 2003. Use use Lotus Notes, so I don't have to deal with Outlook We have licensing for Office 2007, we just haven't switched yet.

I'm still using Office 2003 at home and will be switching to Office 2007 soon (via 3-license home license kit).
IBM X220 | T61p | R61e | T43 | Black Macbook | i5 Hackintosh | i7 iMac 27 | Dell 3007WFP-HC WQXGA

ducky2802
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 306
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:16 am
Location: San Diego, CA

#15 Post by ducky2802 » Sat Mar 24, 2007 2:06 pm

I like some features of 2007, like excel being able to handle larger spreadsheets. But then again, the same 2007 excel doesnt get all the numbers right when Im running linear fit models, so I have to use 2003, and then still have to verify the numbers to calculator! As for word, powerpoint, outlook, I mostly just use the basic features in those programs, so in general, I find no need for the newest office over my 2003 and 2000.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Windows OS (Versions prior to Windows 7)”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest