600X question

Older ThinkPads.. from the 600, the 7xx, the iSeries, 300, 500, the Transnote and, of course, the 701
Post Reply
Message
Author
alfio
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 326
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 11:43 pm
Location: bloomington, in

600X question

#1 Post by alfio » Wed Mar 21, 2007 7:02 pm

i'm interested in a 650mhz 600X - question is, is there something different about a 650mhz model (as opposed to models with lower mhz rating)? or is the cpu speed the only difference?

alfio

rkawakami
Admin
Admin
Posts: 10055
Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2006 1:26 am
Location: San Jose, CA 95120 USA
Contact:

#2 Post by rkawakami » Wed Mar 21, 2007 7:25 pm

Besides using a different motherboard than the 450/500Mhz versions, there's no other significant functional difference, as far as I know. And since the 650Mhz is a SpeedStep enabled processor then it supports the lowering of the CPU speed for power savings.
Ray Kawakami
X22 X24 X31 X41 X41T X60 X60s X61 X61s X200 X200s X300 X301 Z60m Z61t Z61p 560 560Z 600 600E 600X T21 T22 T23 T41 T60p T410 T420 T520 W500 W520 R50 A21p A22p A31 A31p
NOTE: All links to PC-Doctor software hosted by me are dead. Files removed 8/28/12 by manufacturer's demand.

tfflivemb2
Moderator1
Moderator1
Posts: 5532
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 1:17 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

#3 Post by tfflivemb2 » Wed Mar 21, 2007 8:44 pm

The 650MHz and higher units can have the processors swapped amongst themselves, but the 450 and 500Mhz models can only be swapped with themselves.

EDIT: Whizkid is correct. I mis-spoke...they will run at the lower speeds, without a hack.
Last edited by tfflivemb2 on Thu Apr 05, 2007 7:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

whizkid
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1555
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Contact:

#4 Post by whizkid » Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:56 am

You can put the faster CPUs with SpeedStep on the slower system board. It will run at 150MHz under its rated speed unless you hack the hardware.

That is, if you buy an 850MHz PIII (the fastest available), it will run at 700MHz in the slower/older system board, but at 850MHz in the SpeedStep system board.

Upgrade to the latest BIOS BEFORE you swap CPUs.
Machine-Project: 750P, 600X, T42, T60, T400, X1 Carbon Touch

alfio
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 326
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 11:43 pm
Location: bloomington, in

#5 Post by alfio » Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:45 pm

whizkid's post ontradicts the earlier one by tfflivemb2 - which is it?

also, all else performance-wise (i.e RAM, bus speed, eyc) and keyboard is the same?

alfio

Stargate199
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 708
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 2:51 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

#6 Post by Stargate199 » Fri Mar 23, 2007 10:43 pm

All 600Xs can accept MMC-2 Pentium 3 CPUs. The early 600xs did not support SpeedStep, so those will run upgraded CPUs 150 Mhz below their designed speed. You 600X is a SpeedStep model, so upgraded CPUs will run at their full speed. All other specifications (including the keyboard) are all the same. The 600X front side bus runs at 100 Mhz. The maximum ram is 576 MB (2 x 256Mb PC-100 low density ram chips + 64Mb on board). In case you are wondering, the fastest CPU you can install is 850 Mhz MMC-2 Pentium 3. MMC-2 is simply the type of socket the CPU uses.
I have finally rejoined the dark side.
ThinkPad T450s, Core i7 5600u, 12GB RAM, Samsung 850 EVO 500GB SSD.
Previous ThinkPads: T41, T21, 600E

alfio
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 326
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 11:43 pm
Location: bloomington, in

#7 Post by alfio » Fri Mar 23, 2007 10:51 pm

thanks stargate, very concise!

for the record, i don't yet have a 600X but i am looking for one.

alfio

alfio
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 326
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 11:43 pm
Location: bloomington, in

#8 Post by alfio » Thu Apr 05, 2007 6:27 pm

i finally got my 600X running.. i used XP pro restore disks from an X30 and all seems to be working well (go figure). now i need a wireless card, any ideas/recommendations?

i've only had one PCMCIA card (netgear) and i did not enjoy it. i'd like to get something that will not cause headaches.

alfio

edit: a/b/g would be nice but b/g will work just fine

cmarti
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1935
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 1:26 am
Location: Orlando, Florida
Contact:

#9 Post by cmarti » Fri Apr 06, 2007 6:46 am

little a wrote:i finally got my 600X running.. i used XP pro restore disks from an X30 and all seems to be working well (go figure). now i need a wireless card, any ideas/recommendations?
If you don't use the modem why not remove it and install a atheros a/b/g card in the slot and some internal or even better external antenna. :wink:
X32/2.0GHZ/2GB/ENGENIUS EMP-8602+S 600mw mini pci/WD 250GB
X60/1.83GHZ/2GB/Atheros/7K100

alfio
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 326
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 11:43 pm
Location: bloomington, in

#10 Post by alfio » Fri Apr 06, 2007 9:51 am

cmarti wrote:If you don't use the modem why not remove it and install a atheros a/b/g card in the slot and some internal or even better external antenna. :wink:
well, my only hesitation with that idea is that this is supposed to be a work machine for me (i.e. no web surfing) and the PCMCIA card would make it easier to be off line without distractions.

also, price is an issue. as my TP stable grows, i'm spending more and more. how much will your set-up cost vs. a PCMCIA card?

alfio

cmarti
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1935
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 1:26 am
Location: Orlando, Florida
Contact:

#11 Post by cmarti » Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:37 am

little a wrote:
also, price is an issue. as my TP stable grows, i'm spending more and more. how much will your set-up cost vs. a PCMCIA card?

alfio
Well you can get the mini pci card for around $16.00 from undercloker and the antennas would be $13.00 and can be found on ebay.
X32/2.0GHZ/2GB/ENGENIUS EMP-8602+S 600mw mini pci/WD 250GB
X60/1.83GHZ/2GB/Atheros/7K100

alfio
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 326
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 11:43 pm
Location: bloomington, in

#12 Post by alfio » Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:49 am

how would one locate such an atenna? do you have a part/fru number? thanks cmarti!

alfio

tarvoke
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 273
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Slightly Outside America

#13 Post by tarvoke » Fri Apr 06, 2007 2:00 pm

depends on if you want to try internal antenna (seems hasslesome vs. the lcd, and I've heard it doesn't have such good reception) or external.

external you need something like this http://www.netgate.com/product_info.php ... cts_id=398 and then the actual rp-sma antenna of course. like rkawakami did
http://www.rkawakami.net/ibm_600x/mini_pci_wireless/

or you could find some dead wireless router (e.g. motorola 850) that will have the detachable antenna and the u.fl/hirose<->rp-sma pigtail, but the wire probably not long enough.

I have the parts, will get around to it eventually. just that my 600X has a 600E bottom chassis and is annoying to get to the minipci and I am lazy heh.

I like ralink chipset, works great in bsd and linux as well as windows.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6833158015
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6833173005
(I have the msi one and it has worked great so far in appliances like WRAP box, toshiba magnia sg20, ...)

atheros is good too, also nice support in bsd and linux. not sure who the fsck uses a anymore tho ^_^ it's all g 'round here.
go away.

tarvoke
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 273
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Slightly Outside America

#14 Post by tarvoke » Fri Apr 06, 2007 2:02 pm

oops the pigtail I listed says non-bulkhead (altho the pic sure looks like one)

something like this maybe simpler
http://www.netgate.com/product_info.php ... cts_id=189
but still need to go thru the lcd, and kinda ugly in my opinion.
go away.

pkiff
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1426
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 9:17 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

#15 Post by pkiff » Fri Apr 06, 2007 3:02 pm

little a wrote:i finally got my 600X running [...]now i need a wireless card, any ideas/recommendations?
Well, if you decide to go the PC Card route, instead of the mini-PCI with hardware mods, then I can tell you that I've been happy with 3COM X-Jack PC Cards because the retractable antenna allows me to keep it inserted in the machine all the time without worrying about bumping things.

The reception I get is not so great compared to the reception in a new laptop with an antenna built into the LCD lid, but it is good enough for me -- I receive a signal from an old D-Link wireless router through several interior walls, and am also able to receive it through one brick/external wall (i.e. on the back patio).

My current model is a 3Com 11a/b/g Wireless PC Card with XJACK® Antenna (Product #: 3CRPAG175).

It is compatible with XP's (SP2) built-in wireless networking configuration, which some people despise, but which I am happy using. You can use the 3COM drivers instead, and they will give you a couple additional options and a bit of added control, but this card is so old that the drivers are actually older than the SP2 updates. There are probably newer X-Jack cards with better drivers, but I'm not sure how much better the reception will be unless you go with a hardware mod, or an external antenna.

Phil.
W520 (dual-boot Windows 10/Ubuntu 15) · X61 Tablet SXGA+ · T60p UXGA · Legacy: X60T, 600X, 770Z
Thinkpad Media Centre: X61T running XBMC with Broadcom Crystal HD BCM970015, Creative X-Fi Surround 5.1 plugged into Cambridge Audio Sonata AR30 receiver

alfio
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 326
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 11:43 pm
Location: bloomington, in

#16 Post by alfio » Fri Apr 06, 2007 5:26 pm

for the moment, i'm leaning towards the PCMCIA card.

i'd appreciate recommendations and/or i'll consider sales offers for cards known to work well with 600Xs (running XP pro)

TIA

alfio

rkawakami
Admin
Admin
Posts: 10055
Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2006 1:26 am
Location: San Jose, CA 95120 USA
Contact:

#17 Post by rkawakami » Fri Apr 06, 2007 7:38 pm

little a wrote:<snip>.. known to work well with 600Xs (running XP pro)
My daughter uses her 600X running WinXP (can't remember if it's Home or Pro) with a Netgear MA401 802.11b card. It's rarely ever powered off and only has a problem when the Netgear access point decides to go AWOL or the DSL connection drops. I also am using several D-Link DWL-650 (not the "+" versions) cards on my other 600X systems, both XP and 2000. If you do consider the D-Link 650 card, be aware that there are at least 3 revision levels in common use (each with different drivers) that look very similar to each other. Go to the DWL-650 Support Page at D-Link.com for details.
Ray Kawakami
X22 X24 X31 X41 X41T X60 X60s X61 X61s X200 X200s X300 X301 Z60m Z61t Z61p 560 560Z 600 600E 600X T21 T22 T23 T41 T60p T410 T420 T520 W500 W520 R50 A21p A22p A31 A31p
NOTE: All links to PC-Doctor software hosted by me are dead. Files removed 8/28/12 by manufacturer's demand.

norm
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 12:48 am
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

#18 Post by norm » Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:18 pm

I had the same decision point as to which PCMCIA cards to buy and whether to go internal wireless a while ago.

Although I like the thought of internal wireless or the nice retracting attenna xjack card, I decided to go cheap and found the older Dlink DWL 630 cards (wirelessl B/G) to work fine. My primary use was linux so I made sure I got something well supported like the Atheros based versions of these cards with the right hardware and firmware revisions.

I also found out that their latest Windows 2000 drivers come with a proper WPA/WPA2 supplicant. I've had good results with these cards on a 600x and 240, but I've never tried them under XP.

The last DWL 630 I bought was $15 CDN off the local craigslist.... so cheap (as well as reliable) was a overwhelming factor.

Not sure if this post was that useful... but I thought I'd share my experience.
-Norm

tarvoke
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 273
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Slightly Outside America

#19 Post by tarvoke » Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:46 pm

not quite up to date but still useful...
http://ralink.rapla.net/
http://atheros.rapla.net/

(hm they used to have all on one huge page, easy to search. now it is subcategory by vendor... meh)
http://madwifi.org/wiki/Compatibility
go away.

unrortit
Freshman Member
Posts: 66
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 10:50 pm
Location: Sydney, nsw, australia

#20 Post by unrortit » Mon Apr 23, 2007 1:11 pm

go with atheros chipsets,use less battery,and no dertiment to hdd performance whilst on high speed wlan in xp or vista.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “ThinkPad Legacy Hardware”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests