any rumors of X60/X60s SXGA+ screen?
any rumors of X60/X60s SXGA+ screen?
Love my X60 tablet with sxga+ screen, but finding that I'm not using it in tablet mode that much. Are there any rumors of the non-tablet X60/X60s notebooks having an sxga+ option in the near future?
Thinkpad X200s w/ Ultrabase
C2D SL9600 / 8GB / 160GB X25-M G2 / BD MULTI / 12.1" WXGA / INTEL 4500MHD / INTEL 5150 / BT / AT&T WWAN / W7
C2D SL9600 / 8GB / 160GB X25-M G2 / BD MULTI / 12.1" WXGA / INTEL 4500MHD / INTEL 5150 / BT / AT&T WWAN / W7
Re: any rumors of X60/X60s SXGA+ screen?
If they DO, I'll have to sell the one I just bought and replace it. As much as I am looking forward to the portability of my new X60s, XGA/1024x768 does not do it for me.csv96 wrote:Love my X60 tablet with sxga+ screen, but finding that I'm not using it in tablet mode that much. Are there any rumors of the non-tablet X60/X60s notebooks having an sxga+ option in the near future?
-
pianowizard
- Senior ThinkPadder

- Posts: 8368
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:07 am
- Location: Ann Arbor, MI
- Contact:
Re: any rumors of X60/X60s SXGA+ screen?
Nope. Instead, Lenovo is planning to discontinue most if not all 4:3 screens and switch to widescreen Thinkpads instead. So, I think it's unlikely they will offer SXGA+ in future non-tablet X-series models.csv96 wrote:Are there any rumors of the non-tablet X60/X60s notebooks having an sxga+ option in the near future?
Microsoft Surface 3 (Atom x7-Z8700 / 4GB / 128GB / LTE)
Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF (Core i3-3220 / 8GB / 8TB); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770 / 16GB / 9.25TB)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell 3008WFP, U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP
Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF (Core i3-3220 / 8GB / 8TB); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770 / 16GB / 9.25TB)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell 3008WFP, U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP
-
Turbo Audi
- Senior Member

- Posts: 509
- Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 7:40 am
- Location: Sudbury, Massachusetts.
- Contact:
Re: any rumors of X60/X60s SXGA+ screen?
Nooo im going to cry!! Widescreen lappys are for n00bs! jkkkpianowizard wrote:csv96 wrote:
ThinkPad user and ThinkPads.com member since summer, 2006. That was a good summer.
T60---> X60s---> X200s
T60---> X60s---> X200s
Re: any rumors of X60/X60s SXGA+ screen?
LOL for noobs.Turbo Audi wrote:pianowizard wrote:
actually i don't really see the reason for wide screen only thing i can fathom is for watching widescreen movies. In terms of desktop realestate i don't really need that extra space really cause i keep the desktop tidy. Or i could download one of the microsoft power toys that gives me extra desktops. I don't really see the point in squeezing my eyes for see an even smaller font. Can someone pls enlighten me on the advantages of widescreen?
-
pianowizard
- Senior ThinkPadder

- Posts: 8368
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:07 am
- Location: Ann Arbor, MI
- Contact:
Re: any rumors of X60/X60s SXGA+ screen?
No, we aren't talking about widescreens providing more room for desktop icons. See the link below.tyanlion wrote:In terms of desktop realestate i don't really need that extra space really cause i keep the desktop tidy.
See this recent discussion about the advantages of widescreens.tyanlion wrote:Can someone pls enlighten me on the advantages of widescreen?
Microsoft Surface 3 (Atom x7-Z8700 / 4GB / 128GB / LTE)
Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF (Core i3-3220 / 8GB / 8TB); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770 / 16GB / 9.25TB)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell 3008WFP, U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP
Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF (Core i3-3220 / 8GB / 8TB); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770 / 16GB / 9.25TB)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell 3008WFP, U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP
I'm sorry but the more pixels per given area is not a valid argument as you can have a non-widescreen 12.1" display with SXGA+ and more pixels per unit area than the 1280x800 12.1" widescreen display.
Widescreen IMHO is just not useful in a small screen (it's great on my 24" monitor). I would hate to have to squint to read anything, and if I zoom in on a page then we are at square one in terms of how much of a document page I can read without scrolling.
There is a reason why documents are printed on paper in the "portrait" format and that is because it is much easier for the eyes to not have to keep moving left and right. Your eyes would much rather move up and down slightly than left and right.
In the case of films, the rationale for widescreen format is because it fills your peripheral vision better and is more immersive. You can only really focus on one spot at a time though. So no real action ever goes on in those side areas it just to make it more immersive. It might be good for movies, but I'd rather use my 24" monitor or my projector for that. My laptop is for getting work done.
The move to widescreen is definitely driven by economic factors where they can cut more individual screens from the large glass substrate if they cut in the 16:10 ratio. It is cheaper to make widescreen displays, and that's why you see them so much these days, it wasn't done to please the customer.
IMHO at 12.1" widescreen for most uses is just horrible. Maybe when you get to 20-24" you can afford the loss of the vertical dimension.
Widescreen IMHO is just not useful in a small screen (it's great on my 24" monitor). I would hate to have to squint to read anything, and if I zoom in on a page then we are at square one in terms of how much of a document page I can read without scrolling.
There is a reason why documents are printed on paper in the "portrait" format and that is because it is much easier for the eyes to not have to keep moving left and right. Your eyes would much rather move up and down slightly than left and right.
In the case of films, the rationale for widescreen format is because it fills your peripheral vision better and is more immersive. You can only really focus on one spot at a time though. So no real action ever goes on in those side areas it just to make it more immersive. It might be good for movies, but I'd rather use my 24" monitor or my projector for that. My laptop is for getting work done.
The move to widescreen is definitely driven by economic factors where they can cut more individual screens from the large glass substrate if they cut in the 16:10 ratio. It is cheaper to make widescreen displays, and that's why you see them so much these days, it wasn't done to please the customer.
IMHO at 12.1" widescreen for most uses is just horrible. Maybe when you get to 20-24" you can afford the loss of the vertical dimension.
-
ThinkFanatic
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 5:02 pm
- Location: Omaha, NE
motion computing just released a slate tablet, their LE1700, with a 1400x1050 12" display AND touch input.
http://www.motioncomputing.com/buy/buy_le17wt.asp
if lenovo gets around to this, expect it to be similarly expensive. i for one will be waiting.
http://www.motioncomputing.com/buy/buy_le17wt.asp
if lenovo gets around to this, expect it to be similarly expensive. i for one will be waiting.
I disagree. I'm looking for a WXGA screen for a X-series, similar to the form of the widescreen D420 from Dell, except with a 2.5inch 5400rpm hard drive. Would also like 128MB of video memory and a descrete graphics chip for Aero.
I need a bit more pixels than XGA in a 12 inch screen. I'd even take WSXGA or SXGA+, since either would give me about 1440 pixels across.
I'm looking for something to run Vista on for the next 4 years or so. This is to replace my 4.5 year old Gateway 200 (which is/was an XP workhorse). My T43 will continue to be my "server" (via VMware) and I'll use the X6x as my "workstation" and toy.
I preactivation copy of Vista is a bt nicer than an MSDN copy since I can get it up and running a few minutes sooner. Plus it's nice to have some separation of duties in a lab environment.
Plus it's more fun with two computers (and VMware helps to ensure I won't need more than that). YMMV.
But I welcome our >XGA overlords, even if it means widescreen. One nice thing about widescreen is a fullsized keyboard can be used.
I need a bit more pixels than XGA in a 12 inch screen. I'd even take WSXGA or SXGA+, since either would give me about 1440 pixels across.
I'm looking for something to run Vista on for the next 4 years or so. This is to replace my 4.5 year old Gateway 200 (which is/was an XP workhorse). My T43 will continue to be my "server" (via VMware) and I'll use the X6x as my "workstation" and toy.
I preactivation copy of Vista is a bt nicer than an MSDN copy since I can get it up and running a few minutes sooner. Plus it's nice to have some separation of duties in a lab environment.
Plus it's more fun with two computers (and VMware helps to ensure I won't need more than that). YMMV.
But I welcome our >XGA overlords, even if it means widescreen. One nice thing about widescreen is a fullsized keyboard can be used.
IBM X220 | T61p | R61e | T43 | Black Macbook | i5 Hackintosh | i7 iMac 27 | Dell 3007WFP-HC WQXGA
-
pianowizard
- Senior ThinkPadder

- Posts: 8368
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:07 am
- Location: Ann Arbor, MI
- Contact:
Cheeebs, sorry about not replying earlier.cheeebs wrote:PW,
do you have any [speculative] info on the next screens to be offered in tablets?
In another thread, someone claimed that a Lenovo employee had told him that there would DEFINITELY not be a widescreen X series. I don't know why different Lenovo employees say different things. We'll find out who's right in a few months I guess.
Another thing is, I read somewhere that Lenovo has been having a hard time getting 12.1" SXGA+ displays for the X60 tablet. So, if the X series will indeed continue to use 4:3 screens, it's unlikely that SXGA+ will be an option; we will be stuck with XGA.
Microsoft Surface 3 (Atom x7-Z8700 / 4GB / 128GB / LTE)
Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF (Core i3-3220 / 8GB / 8TB); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770 / 16GB / 9.25TB)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell 3008WFP, U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP
Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF (Core i3-3220 / 8GB / 8TB); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770 / 16GB / 9.25TB)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell 3008WFP, U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP
Re: any rumors of X60/X60s SXGA+ screen?
Your screen has an added bonus (other than the resolution), of being IPS - wide-view-angle and better colors than the regular screen. Even if higher-res screens would be available for future X-non-tablet models, they will probably not be as good. I'd definitely keep the tablet, even if you barely use the feature. Its only disadvantage is higher weight, compared to the X60, and mostly X60s.csv96 wrote:Love my X60 tablet with sxga+ screen, but finding that I'm not using it in tablet mode that much. Are there any rumors of the non-tablet X60/X60s notebooks having an sxga+ option in the near future?
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
X60 Tablet, SXGA+ screen display issue (vague white blobs - adhesive)
by topramen » Mon Jan 23, 2017 10:55 pm » in Thinkpad X6x Series incl. X6x Tablet - 1 Replies
- 1317 Views
-
Last post by ajkula66
Tue Jan 24, 2017 7:50 am
-
-
-
WTB: X60 Tablet, SXGA+ (1400x1050) display
by topramen » Mon Jan 23, 2017 10:16 pm » in Marketplace - Forum Members only - 3 Replies
- 388 Views
-
Last post by unixed
Tue Jan 24, 2017 5:34 pm
-
-
-
T22 SXGA+ Screen cables - Same as the XGA one?
by T3f4l » Wed Feb 01, 2017 5:30 pm » in ThinkPad T2x & T3x Series - 1 Replies
- 1241 Views
-
Last post by ajkula66
Wed Feb 01, 2017 6:34 pm
-
-
-
WTB: X60T/X61T SXGA+, Complete Top Lid or Screen Only
by olex126 » Mon Mar 27, 2017 7:55 pm » in Marketplace - Forum Members only - 0 Replies
- 242 Views
-
Last post by olex126
Mon Mar 27, 2017 7:55 pm
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: el-sahef and 5 guests




