hitachi 7k100 vs. seagate momentus 7200

X60/X61 series specific matters only.
Post Reply
Message
Author
tian
Posts: 45
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 1:00 pm

hitachi 7k100 vs. seagate momentus 7200

#1 Post by tian » Sat Mar 24, 2007 8:47 am

hi there!

i know that there are a few posts about hardisk replacements for x60, however i cant seem to find a post that discusses the pros/cons of hitachi 7k100 vs. momentus 7200.

i will be purchasing one of these disks for my new x60 (which will come with 60gb @ 5400). i was wondering if owners of one (or both) of the above could offer some subjective comments on - compared to either each other or others:

1. durability
2. power consumption
3. temperature that the drives run at
4. noise level

the objective facts are here if anyone is interested:
Hitachi Travelstar 7K100 100GB S150 8M
Seagate Momentus 7200.1 100GB S150

according to the links above they are pretty much on par with each other:

a. hitachi being slightly fast (seek time by 0.5ms)
b. hitachi being more durable (shock tolerance, 50g operating, 200g when powered down)
c. seagate being slightly quieter (by 1db)

though from experience i'd take these facts with a pinch of salt - especially that from experience the hitachi drives are way hotter and noisier than my western digital drives (even though according to specs they are supposed to be similar).

-

if having a 5400rpm drive means substantially better durability, less power compsumption and noise then i'd be happy to go for a 120gb version of either one.

-

are there any compatibility issues with either of the above?

thanks for reading!
tian

x240, 8gb, FHD intel 4400, SD7SB3Q128G1001, intel 7260, W7x84
w540, 32gb, 3k nvidia k2100m, CT512M550SSD, intel 7260, Xubuntu x64
w530, 32gb, FHD nvidia k2000m, CT480M500SSD mSATA + SSD, intel 6300, W8.1x64
x60, 2gb, 100gb 7k100, ibm agbn, xp pro

tian
Posts: 45
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 1:00 pm

#2 Post by tian » Sat Mar 24, 2007 9:05 am

according to the review on notebookreviews they are pretty much the same for the PATA versions - i'm assuming that the SATA versions arnt going to be too different :)

i think i'm going to go for the hitachi one after all.

x240, 8gb, FHD intel 4400, SD7SB3Q128G1001, intel 7260, W7x84
w540, 32gb, 3k nvidia k2100m, CT512M550SSD, intel 7260, Xubuntu x64
w530, 32gb, FHD nvidia k2000m, CT480M500SSD mSATA + SSD, intel 6300, W8.1x64
x60, 2gb, 100gb 7k100, ibm agbn, xp pro

smvp6459
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 462
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 11:02 pm
Location: USA

#3 Post by smvp6459 » Sat Mar 24, 2007 11:37 am

tian wrote:the objective facts are here if anyone is interested:
I'm not sure I'd call the manufacturer data sheets "objective."

You can look at the different tests of the drives:
http://www23.tomshardware.com/storage25 ... &chart=144

This article has more of a description of the drive performance:
http://www.tomshardware.com/2005/11/11/ ... d_furious/
Last edited by smvp6459 on Sat Mar 24, 2007 12:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

tian
Posts: 45
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 1:00 pm

#4 Post by tian » Sat Mar 24, 2007 11:43 am

thanks for those links!

whoa... it seems that the 7200rpm drives are pretty power greedy - twice the wattage of the 5400rpms. this is making me think twice about the performance/battery compromise.

x240, 8gb, FHD intel 4400, SD7SB3Q128G1001, intel 7260, W7x84
w540, 32gb, 3k nvidia k2100m, CT512M550SSD, intel 7260, Xubuntu x64
w530, 32gb, FHD nvidia k2000m, CT480M500SSD mSATA + SSD, intel 6300, W8.1x64
x60, 2gb, 100gb 7k100, ibm agbn, xp pro

iMav
Sophomore Member
Posts: 129
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 8:11 am
Location: Columbus, WI
Contact:

#5 Post by iMav » Sat Mar 24, 2007 2:40 pm

I recently purchased this drive from NewEgg for my new X60s. Great price and has gotten great reviews.

tian
Posts: 45
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 1:00 pm

#6 Post by tian » Sat Mar 24, 2007 2:47 pm

yep :D - i'll personally vouch for the western digital drive. i used the very same one in my old dell x300 when it suffered a drop - though unfortunatly it's a 5400rpm. quiet as a mouse and never got very hot even after a night's bittorrenting :shock:.

i'm half thinking of waiting until perpendicular drives becomes more common as the 7200rpms seems to be a lot more power hungry than the 5400s.

x240, 8gb, FHD intel 4400, SD7SB3Q128G1001, intel 7260, W7x84
w540, 32gb, 3k nvidia k2100m, CT512M550SSD, intel 7260, Xubuntu x64
w530, 32gb, FHD nvidia k2000m, CT480M500SSD mSATA + SSD, intel 6300, W8.1x64
x60, 2gb, 100gb 7k100, ibm agbn, xp pro

rek
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 396
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 8:27 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

#7 Post by rek » Sat Mar 24, 2007 11:33 pm

I have one of the Seagate Momentus 7200.1 100GB SATA drives, and don't like it -- in fact it's sitting unused in a drawer, rather than in a computer being used. The 'whooshing' sound of the platters at 7200rpm are simply too loud for my liking.

I much prefer the Hitachi 60GB 5400rpm drive that came with my X60s.

If low noise is a priority for you, check out www.silentpcreview.com -- they have a section on recommended hard disks. General reports seem to be that Samsung and WD are the go for low noise, and to reduce the 'whoosh' sound as much as possible, try and find a single-platter disk (which unfortunately limits storage capacity).
MacBook Pro Retina 13.3 2560x1600 | i5-4258U | 8GB | 256GB SSD | BT+abgnac
Surface Pro 3 12.0 2160x1440 | i5-4300U | 8GB | 256GB SSD | BT+abgnac

sugo
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1813
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 11:54 am
Location: Seattle, WA

#8 Post by sugo » Sun Mar 25, 2007 12:27 am

I have the Hitachi 60GB in my X60s and I thought that was noisy enough.
X61

tyanlion
Sophomore Member
Posts: 169
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 12:30 pm
Location: Singapore

#9 Post by tyanlion » Sun Mar 25, 2007 4:49 am

Hitachi 80gb 5400rpm yeah its hell noisy already lol

tian
Posts: 45
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 1:00 pm

#10 Post by tian » Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:26 am

my x60 is due to arrive any moment now :shock:

i ordered an 7k100 and fitted it in my housemate's laptop (x60 and t60), and i have to say: it's not that much louder! (i will probably retract this post when i try installing windows xp later on today :D)

x240, 8gb, FHD intel 4400, SD7SB3Q128G1001, intel 7260, W7x84
w540, 32gb, 3k nvidia k2100m, CT512M550SSD, intel 7260, Xubuntu x64
w530, 32gb, FHD nvidia k2000m, CT480M500SSD mSATA + SSD, intel 6300, W8.1x64
x60, 2gb, 100gb 7k100, ibm agbn, xp pro

poky
Sophomore Member
Posts: 145
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 10:33 am
Location: San Antonio, Texas

#11 Post by poky » Wed Mar 28, 2007 10:29 pm

I currently running a Seagate Momentus 7200.2 160GB SATA on my X60s
It's much faster and feel a little bit quite than my old 7k100 100g
Transmission Rate is 60mb/s(7200.2) compare to 50mb/s(7k100)

tian
Posts: 45
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 1:00 pm

#12 Post by tian » Thu Mar 29, 2007 4:44 am

i managed to set up my x60 last night. first thing i did after taking it out of the package was to slot in an extra gb ram and swap the 5.2k with the 7.2k (hitachi 7.2k 100g)... and boy is it zippy :D

poky: where did you get the perpendicular drive from?! :) (not that i'll be upgrading for a while yet, if i do it will be to a ssd in a couple of years time)

(and as predicted, yes, i do retract that statement about the noise, it does "click" noisily but in a comforting kinda way :wink:)

x240, 8gb, FHD intel 4400, SD7SB3Q128G1001, intel 7260, W7x84
w540, 32gb, 3k nvidia k2100m, CT512M550SSD, intel 7260, Xubuntu x64
w530, 32gb, FHD nvidia k2000m, CT480M500SSD mSATA + SSD, intel 6300, W8.1x64
x60, 2gb, 100gb 7k100, ibm agbn, xp pro

cheeebs
Freshman Member
Posts: 79
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 11:49 pm
Location: texas

#13 Post by cheeebs » Thu Mar 29, 2007 8:18 am

can anyone make a ballpark approximation of what kind of impact a 7200rpm hdd vs. a 5400rpm hdd would have on battery usage for an average user in average conditions? just looking to get a feel for the basic difference in a real-world setting... i realize there's no "average user", etc. it looks that the power consumption in either idle or max. is about twice that of a 5400rpm hdd. what might that mean in terms of battery time?

smvp6459
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 462
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 11:02 pm
Location: USA

#14 Post by smvp6459 » Thu Mar 29, 2007 8:23 am

cheeebs wrote:can anyone make a ballpark approximation of what kind of impact a 7200rpm hdd vs. a 5400rpm hdd would have on battery usage for an average user in average conditions?
http://www23.tomshardware.com/storage25 ... &chart=157

http://www23.tomshardware.com/storage25 ... &chart=156

Just look at the watt hours of your battery to get an idea of the impact of the difference.

renhui
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 309
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 6:11 am
Location: Calgary, Canada

#15 Post by renhui » Sat Mar 31, 2007 8:29 am

On my T60 with 6 cell battery, I got about 2:50min with the stock 100GB 5K100 HDD while with the 100GB 7200.1 HDD the battery life shrunk to 2:20min. 7200rpm is noticably hotter than 5400rpm BTW.
Current Thinkpad Gallery: X301 X200 T40
Past: T400/T61/T60/X60T/X60/Z60/X41T/X40/T21

proaudioguy
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 892
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 9:36 pm

#16 Post by proaudioguy » Wed Apr 25, 2007 7:15 pm

rek wrote:I have one of the Seagate Momentus 7200.1 100GB SATA drives, and don't like it -- in fact it's sitting unused in a drawer, rather than in a computer being used. The 'whooshing' sound of the platters at 7200rpm are simply too loud for my liking.

I much prefer the Hitachi 60GB 5400rpm drive that came with my X60s.

If low noise is a priority for you, check out www.silentpcreview.com -- they have a section on recommended hard disks. General reports seem to be that Samsung and WD are the go for low noise, and to reduce the 'whoosh' sound as much as possible, try and find a single-platter disk (which unfortunately limits storage capacity).
Do you want to sell that guy?

proaudioguy
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 892
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 9:36 pm

#17 Post by proaudioguy » Wed Apr 25, 2007 7:22 pm

I have a 5400 40 gig, 5400 60 gig, and a 7200 100 gig, all Seagate and I love them. I went with the Seagate because I have had 2 Travelstar 4200 40 gig drives go down, while my good friend has had 1 5400 (or 5200) Travelstar 60 gig that's about to die last I checked. I'm not saying the 7k100s are bad, it was just enough to keep me away from them. The Seagate has a GREAT warantee. I've been using all but the 100 gig for over a year and the 100 for around 8 or 9 months. My friend bought the hitachi travelstar 7k100 and it's been working fine for him for about a year.

rek
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 396
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 8:27 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

#18 Post by rek » Wed Apr 25, 2007 8:31 pm

proaudioguy wrote:
rek wrote:I have one of the Seagate Momentus 7200.1 100GB SATA drives, and don't like it -- in fact it's sitting unused in a drawer, rather than in a computer being used. The 'whooshing' sound of the platters at 7200rpm are simply too loud for my liking.
Do you want to sell that guy?
I ended up finding a buyer for it shortly after I posted that, sorry :)
MacBook Pro Retina 13.3 2560x1600 | i5-4258U | 8GB | 256GB SSD | BT+abgnac
Surface Pro 3 12.0 2160x1440 | i5-4300U | 8GB | 256GB SSD | BT+abgnac

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Thinkpad X6x Series incl. X6x Tablet”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: el-sahef and 5 guests