Benchmark | 3Dmark2005

Message

Torque · #1 Post by **Torque** » Sun Oct 10, 2004 6:49 am

Hi guys

Just benchmarked my T41p today, and scored a modest 986 points.

Put up your scores here!

katman · #2 Post by **katman** » Tue Oct 26, 2004 12:48 am

link for the benchmark?

zzyss · #3 Post by **zzyss** » Thu Nov 04, 2004 4:55 am

I can't even run it on my T40 (the 9000 doesn't support some critical thingy, I forget what its called now).

Link: www.futuremark.com

Torque · #4 Post by **Torque** » Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:50 am

You can find the free 3Dmark05 here at www.futuremark.com

Give it a shot

tselling · #5 Post by **tselling** » Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:36 pm

That seems low to me. My T41p (a rebuild with 1.7Ghz Dothan instead of 1.7Ghz Banias) gets over 1300 with 3dmark05 (omega drivers plus tpfancontrol and NHC both used to keep Laptop cool enough).

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1890732

Torque wrote:Hi guys

Just benchmarked my T41p today, and scored a modest 986 points.

Put up your scores here!

r1ckchard · #6 Post by **r1ckchard** » Mon Mar 20, 2006 8:52 pm

Definitely seems a bit low. My ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 (T42) with Omega drivers is getting 1073.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1896610

EDIT - Oddly enough, Futuremark is reporting my video card as having 128MB of video memory, but I can assure you I only have 64MB of video memory. Very odd..

leoblob · #7 Post by **leoblob** » Mon Mar 20, 2006 9:58 pm

The lastest version (2006) is a 580MB download ???

JHEM · #8 Post by **JHEM** » Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:49 pm

Torque wrote:Just benchmarked my T41p today, and scored a modest 986 points.

2373-GEU T41p, 1.5GB RAM, 7K100 HD.

PCMark - 3081

CPU Score - 3049

Am I doing something wrong?

Regards,

James

r1ckchard · #9 Post by **r1ckchard** » Tue Mar 21, 2006 12:18 am

I believe he was looking at the 3dMark score, but it wasn't stated so I'm not sure.

tselling · #10 Post by **tselling** » Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:41 pm

James,
Are you using PCMark instead of 3DMark05?

tom2517 · #11 Post by **tom2517** » Wed Mar 22, 2006 9:34 pm

r1ckchard wrote:Definitely seems a bit low. My ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 (T42) with Omega drivers is getting 1073.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1896610

EDIT - Oddly enough, Futuremark is reporting my video card as having 128MB of video memory, but I can assure you I only have 64MB of video memory. Very odd..

Did you downloaded the latest BIOS and driver? Because it either boosted or changed the ram figure. Mine is now showing 256MB even though it's a 128MB card.

But I don't see any performance enhancement.

r1ckchard · #12 Post by **r1ckchard** » Wed Mar 22, 2006 11:12 pm

I ran 3dMark05 with BIOS v3.19 and the latest Omega Drivers (Catalyst 6.2, I believe). I'm guessing the Omega Drivers caused 3dMark to think that my video card has 128MB of video memory, but my system still reports 64MB of video memory.

dr_st · #13 Post by **dr_st** » Thu Mar 23, 2006 2:18 am

I got around 1050 with Omega Drivers on T42 w/ 64MB 9600, and around 1150 when I overclocked the card. The 128MB version should get around 1300, as reported by tselling.

However, if you're running the T41p on stock FireGL drivers, it may be the cause of reduced performance.

det922 · #14 Post by **det922** » Wed Mar 29, 2006 12:46 am

the extra memory is ATI's new hypermemory thing they biult into all of there recent drivers i got a t43p with fireglv3200 (x600) 128mb and ive seen it report 256 due to atis new thing, there are some gains from it, but it has a alot of different factors for some computers it makes all the difference and for some, just marginal

i had a a31 that after new drivers went from 16to 64mb of vid memory that let me play a few more games smoothly

my t41 went from 32 to 128 and i noticed nothing

the t43p with it shows a nice boost

dr_st · #15 Post by **dr_st** » Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:39 am

det922 wrote:the extra memory is ATI's new hypermemory thing they biult into all of there recent drivers

Is it included with the recent Omega drivers?

det922 · #16 Post by **det922** » Sat Apr 01, 2006 2:38 pm

yes it is its even an option you can change with the omega drivers, and with it on the firegl it rates at 256

Cmdr.Keen · #17 Post by **Cmdr.Keen** » Mon Apr 03, 2006 9:49 pm

Just for kicks I ran 3DMark05 on my system (config in signature):

3DMark: 911

CPU: 3689

Not blazing, by any stretch, but I can still play my favs. I've not changed drivers to the Omega ones yet, though.

-Andrew

sugo · #18 Post by **sugo** » Tue Apr 04, 2006 7:47 pm

1059 for a T42 9600

clickk · #19 Post by **clickk** » Mon Apr 24, 2006 9:00 pm

T60 1ghz dual core, 128 ati x1400

3Dmarks05 barely over 2000

Pascal_TTH · #20 Post by **Pascal_TTH** » Mon May 29, 2006 3:15 am

I also benchmark my T41p before and after upgrade :

IBM Thinkpad T41p

Mobility Radeon FireGL T2 128 Mo
Pentium M 1,7 GHz (Banias)
Score 3D Mark 2003 : 2536
Score 3D Mark 2005 : 1000

IBM Thinkpad T41p upgrade Dothan 1,7 GHz

Mobility Radeon FireGL T2 128 Mo
Pentium M 735
Score 3D Mark 2003 : 2536 -> 2830 (+11,6%)
Score 3D Mark 2005 : 1000 -> 1247 (+24,7%)

Nice boost with a second hand Dothan (100 €) !

astro · #21 Post by **astro** » Tue May 30, 2006 8:15 pm

2007-63U (2.0GHz, 1GB, X1400)
3DMark05

2078 3DMarks
4537 CPUMarks

Power Manager: ThinkPad Default
Lenovo Driver: 8.204-051220a1-031127C-Lenovo
CCC settings:
-AA: Application
-AF: App
-AI: Std
-MM: Perf
-Refresh: Perf
-AAA: Off

Benchmark | 3Dmark2005

Benchmark | 3Dmark2005

Re: Benchmark | 3Dmark2005

Re: Benchmark | 3Dmark2005

Who is online