Is FireGL V5250 worth $115 more than X1400?

T60/T61 series specific matters only
Post Reply

Is Fire GL V5250 worth $115 more than X1400?

Poll ended at Wed Jul 04, 2007 10:39 am

Yes
12
86%
No
2
14%
 
Total votes: 14

Message
Author
hoya
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 670
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 8:01 pm
Location: Washington, DC

Is FireGL V5250 worth $115 more than X1400?

#1 Post by hoya » Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:39 am

I need some help deciding on this one: I'm ordering a T60 2613CTO w/ a 15" SXGA+ Flexview panel and have the option of getting a "p" version for an additional $115. all other components are equal with the exception of the WiFi - the T60p would ship with the newer 802.11n card while the T60 would ship with the IBM a/b/g card. no difference to me so I'm not taking that into consideration.

Is the V5250 worth the additional $115? does it produce much more heat than the X1400 or cause more of a drain on battery life?

RonS
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 1374
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 4:48 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon

#2 Post by RonS » Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:49 am

That's a tough question to answer without knowing how you use your computer.

For me, it's worth it. I write and use software that make heavy use of graphics, and I'm running Vista with Aero.

If you do mostly document editing, run XP, and otherwise don't have heavy graphics use, then it's probably not worth it.
Apathy is on the rise, but nobody seems to care.

Esben
Sophomore Member
Posts: 141
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 7:50 am
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Contact:

#3 Post by Esben » Wed Jun 27, 2007 11:39 am

X1400 can easily run Aero. You should go for the V5250 if you plan to play games, or use other heavier 3D-applications. You can go to ATI's site and lookup the X1400 and X1700 (of which the V5250 is a professional version).

If you only type and browse the net, I'd choose the integrated video instead.
Lenovo Thinkpad X230,
i5-3320M | 8 GB DDR3-1600 | 256 GB Crucial M4 | 12.5" IPS | Windows 8 Pro

rmarshll
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 3:35 am
Location: Medicine Hat, Alberta, Canada

#4 Post by rmarshll » Wed Jun 27, 2007 12:43 pm

if you use video editing or play any games the v5250 is the way to go.. I have used all 3 video cards in the t60's and t60p's and you really can't even compair the x1400 and v5250. the v5250 blows the x1400 out of the water
T60p T7200, 2GB RAM, 60GB 7200rpm HD, 14.1in 1400x1050 LCD, 256MB ATI Radeon FireGL V5250, CDRW/DVDRW/DL, Intel 802.11abg wireless, Bluetooth/Modem, 1Gb Ethernet, UltraNav, Secure chip, Fingerprint reader, 6c Li-Ion batt, Vista Business

ryengineer
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 4393
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 9:29 pm
Location: L.A. (home town) CA, Toronto ON.

#5 Post by ryengineer » Wed Jun 27, 2007 1:59 pm

The downside I see of FireGL gpu are a little heat issue and more battery consumption. Other than that it's newer, better and faster than ATI counterpart.
"I've come a long, long way," she said, "and I will go as far,
With the man who takes me from my horse, and leads me to a bar."
The man who took her off her steed, and stood her to a beer,
Were a bleary-eyed Surveyor and a DRUNKEN ENGINEER.

hoya
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 670
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 8:01 pm
Location: Washington, DC

#6 Post by hoya » Wed Jun 27, 2007 3:36 pm

thanks to everyone for the excellent replies.

It looks like the decision is made: T60p it is.

I also realized that resale should be better on a T60p v. a T60 ( I tend to buy a new ThinkPad every 5 months) so that $115 should be well spent.

now do I go for the 7K200 or stick with my 7200.2? (off-topic so more of a rhetorical question)

winslow
Sophomore Member
Posts: 231
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 1:22 am
Location: Hawaii

#7 Post by winslow » Wed Jun 27, 2007 11:24 pm

ryengineer wrote:The downside I see of FireGL gpu are a little heat issue and more battery consumption. Other than that it's newer, better and faster than ATI counterpart.

I thought the 5250 was ATI?
G41 2886 79U T23 2647 XHX

T23 2647 HU3 T23 2647 RU3

T30 2366 81U

Bing0
Freshman Member
Posts: 61
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 5:33 pm
Location: Augusta, Georgia

#8 Post by Bing0 » Wed Jun 27, 2007 11:36 pm

While the X1400 is not a slow card, the v5250 is definitely worth it to me. What people do not seem to realize is that generally everything that a computer is doing is largely displayed on the screen.
A slow video card can be a bottleneck for perfomance. especially on laptops where the connection is all digital and also where the screen resolution may be higer.

For these reasons, I always go for the fastest video card that I can afford.
Bing0

jkahng
Sophomore Member
Posts: 210
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 9:57 am
Location: Seoul, Korea / California

#9 Post by jkahng » Wed Jun 27, 2007 11:40 pm

your question is misleading.
the N third antenna itself is worth $55 on my Z61m. the abgn card retails for $400 in korea (you can get it for about $100)

this alone is worth the upgrade cost.

as for the extra graphics horse power (x1400 => v5250) is always good to have. you can turn it on when needed. if you don't have it, you can't.
no brainer IMHO.
Z61M(9541-5HK) T7200, 3.0gb ram, X1400, 500gb 7200rpm HDD, Windows 7, Advanced mini dock
T400 2765-82u T9800 8gb ram, crucial M ssd, windows 7, Advanced mini dock

SkiBunny
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 520
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 6:51 pm
Location: Canada

#10 Post by SkiBunny » Thu Jun 28, 2007 3:31 am

But the full list price of the FireGL is only $100 more than the ATI X (usually only $75-$85 more with various widely available discounts).

As others point out, it's worthwhile only if you need it, otherwise in fact it's a detriment. For me, I have plenty of RAM (should update my sig lol) so the ATI is more than sufficient. I'd like to find the sweet spot between battery consumption and graphics needs.

It seems that for the T61, the designers have sacrificed far too much power consumption (26 watts) for the sake of dedicated graphics. You'll need a 12-cell battery, like HP offers, with a power thirsty monster like the T61's nvidia.

SkiBunny
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 520
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 6:51 pm
Location: Canada

#11 Post by SkiBunny » Thu Jun 28, 2007 3:33 am

Be sure to get a flexview on that nice T60p. EDIT: oh you did, hehe

I just compared a T60 flexview side-by-side today at work with a new T61 SWXGA+, and the T61 screen quality was just awful compared to the T60p flexview.

ryengineer
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 4393
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 9:29 pm
Location: L.A. (home town) CA, Toronto ON.

#12 Post by ryengineer » Thu Jun 28, 2007 6:25 am

winslow wrote:I thought the 5250 was ATI?
It is, FireGL is a chipset name, ATI continued to use it after the acquisition of that company.
"I've come a long, long way," she said, "and I will go as far,
With the man who takes me from my horse, and leads me to a bar."
The man who took her off her steed, and stood her to a beer,
Were a bleary-eyed Surveyor and a DRUNKEN ENGINEER.

hoya
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 670
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 8:01 pm
Location: Washington, DC

#13 Post by hoya » Thu Jun 28, 2007 2:09 pm

upon learning that there is a $250 off coupon for the T60 w/ a Flexview (even on EPP!), I decided to go with that instead of the T60p.

I really have no need for the more powerful graphics and fear that the extra heat and reduced battery life would negate any possible upside in resale value or performance.

besides, that $250 pays for a 200gb 7K200 which is sure to bring more of a performance gain in my case.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “ThinkPad T6x Series”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: iModFrenzy and 14 guests