ZoneAlarm crashes my T60p / XP on startup
ZoneAlarm crashes my T60p / XP on startup
I just installed the basic (free) version of ZoneAlarm and it caused my TP to crash (BSOD) on every restart. When I removed ZoneAlarm the crashes stopped. Sigh of relief!
Perhaps a conflict with some ThinkVantage utility or Symantec Anti-virus or other software?
I'm not sure this is specific to T60, but I have no other TP to compare.
Perhaps a conflict with some ThinkVantage utility or Symantec Anti-virus or other software?
I'm not sure this is specific to T60, but I have no other TP to compare.
Current: T60p (2007-93G). Previous: T23 (2647-9LG).
-
Redmumba
- Sophomore Member
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 10:47 am
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
I don't think its specific to Thinkpads at all.
I had this problem on an older Dell desktop (the one I'm typing on now, actually, since I'm "working"). It seems to come and go with the Windows installation. You may want to have a look at the ZoneAlarm forums here for further information on the topic.
I had this problem on an older Dell desktop (the one I'm typing on now, actually, since I'm "working"). It seems to come and go with the Windows installation. You may want to have a look at the ZoneAlarm forums here for further information on the topic.
Real Name: Andrew
Junior CS major, Polytechnic University
T61 - Core Duo 2.2ghz, 2GB, 100GB 7200RPM, nVidia 140M
Asus Z70Va: P-M 2.0, 2GB, 100GB 5400RPM, ATI MRX700
Junior CS major, Polytechnic University
T61 - Core Duo 2.2ghz, 2GB, 100GB 7200RPM, nVidia 140M
Asus Z70Va: P-M 2.0, 2GB, 100GB 5400RPM, ATI MRX700
I have had problems with ZoneAlarm in the past as well. I abandoned ZoneAlarm about 2 years ago and went with Kerio. The main conflict was when I was using my cellular connection.
http://forum.thinkpads.com/viewtopic.php?t=14229
http://forum.thinkpads.com/viewtopic.php?t=14229
DKB
Sunbelt Software bought Kerio Personal Firewall from Kerio a couple of years back. You can get it here:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/Home-Ho ... -Firewall/
Caveat: while I like Kerio Personal Firewall 4, AFAIK it has not had any updates in the last couple of years.
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/Home-Ho ... -Firewall/
Caveat: while I like Kerio Personal Firewall 4, AFAIK it has not had any updates in the last couple of years.
DKB
I've had Zone Alarm Pro running on my T42p successfully for years. Whenever ZoneAlarm starts acting up, it is usually a problem caused by the faulty installation of some other program. Most recently, I experienced this with a recent version of Skype.
The program I can imagine would need to be removed from a stock TP for ZoneAlarm to work properly would be all the Symantec Norton stuff. There actually is a removal tool available from Symantec to help rid your machine of their atrocious and pernicious product.
The program I can imagine would need to be removed from a stock TP for ZoneAlarm to work properly would be all the Symantec Norton stuff. There actually is a removal tool available from Symantec to help rid your machine of their atrocious and pernicious product.
HP DV8t | Intel i7-Q 720 | 6GB (DDR3 1333) RAM | 1 TB (500GB Seagate 7200 rpm x2)| GeForce GT 230M (1GB) | 18.4" FHD | SuperMulti 8X w Lightscribe | FP Reader | Bluetooth | HDTV Tuner | Win 7 Ultimate x64. Backup: T61p (8891-CTO)
Why is some other program at fault? Perhaps ZoneAlarm is at fault, if it has compatibility problems with so many other programs?pae77 wrote:Whenever ZoneAlarm starts acting up, it is usually a problem caused by the faulty installation of some other program.
Well, I removed the Norton stuff as in the IBM preload, but I now have my company's corporate version of Norton anti-virus installed.pae77 wrote: The program I can imagine would need to be removed from a stock TP for ZoneAlarm to work properly would be all the Symantec Norton stuff.
Please explain why it is atrocious and pernicious. On a couple of occasions it has caught a pernicious virus!pae77 wrote:...Symantec Norton stuff...atrocious and pernicious product.
Current: T60p (2007-93G). Previous: T23 (2647-9LG).
Well, in my case ZoneAlarm hasn't had a compatibility problem with any applications (except with other Firewalls which is quite proper as only one software firewall application should be running on one's system at a time). The problem I mentioned with Skype was not caused by any incompatibility with ZoneAlarm. It was that something with the Skype installer messed up a lot of things with my installation of XP, and the problems I subsequently experienced with ZoneAlarm were just a symptom of that much larger problem. It was not a problem with ZoneAlarm per se and it was fixed once I recovered from the problems caused by the Skype installer.Anthony S wrote:Why is some other program at fault? Perhaps ZoneAlarm is at fault, if it has compatibility problems with so many other programs?
* * *
Please explain why [Norton] is atrocious and pernicious. On a couple of occasions it has caught a pernicious virus!
Norton is atrocious and pernicious (IMO only of course), because: 1) It is an unnecessarily heavy user of system resources which often results in slower overall system performance, especially on slower machines like my ancient T42p. 2) It is extremely difficult to completely uninstall it and remove all traces from one's system once it has been installed, hence the manufacturer has found it necessary to provide a "removal tool." 3) It is not most effective antivirus solution available. (See for example recent test results by AV Comparatives.) There are several more effective solutions available that consume less system resources.
HP DV8t | Intel i7-Q 720 | 6GB (DDR3 1333) RAM | 1 TB (500GB Seagate 7200 rpm x2)| GeForce GT 230M (1GB) | 18.4" FHD | SuperMulti 8X w Lightscribe | FP Reader | Bluetooth | HDTV Tuner | Win 7 Ultimate x64. Backup: T61p (8891-CTO)
That may well be so, but nothing you have said warrants judging the product as "atrocious and pernicious".pae77 wrote:There are several more effective solutions available that consume less system resources.
In any case, I am more concerned with whether there is an incompatibility issue between Symantec anti-virus and ZoneAlarm firewall. I don't see why there should be, but you never know
Current: T60p (2007-93G). Previous: T23 (2647-9LG).
Perhaps my sentiment is a little overstated but I have seen good results come from purging that program from several systems and replacing it with other alternatives.
Getting back to ZA: It might be worthwhile trying uninstalling ZA, rebooting and reinstalling ZA, if you haven't done that already. Also, in ZoneAlarm iteslf, make sure you are running the latest version and make sure that your AV program has full permissions. Also, make sure the Symantec program doesn't already have a firewall component running and if it does, either turn it off or use it instead of ZA. Only one firewall should be running at a time.
Getting back to ZA: It might be worthwhile trying uninstalling ZA, rebooting and reinstalling ZA, if you haven't done that already. Also, in ZoneAlarm iteslf, make sure you are running the latest version and make sure that your AV program has full permissions. Also, make sure the Symantec program doesn't already have a firewall component running and if it does, either turn it off or use it instead of ZA. Only one firewall should be running at a time.
HP DV8t | Intel i7-Q 720 | 6GB (DDR3 1333) RAM | 1 TB (500GB Seagate 7200 rpm x2)| GeForce GT 230M (1GB) | 18.4" FHD | SuperMulti 8X w Lightscribe | FP Reader | Bluetooth | HDTV Tuner | Win 7 Ultimate x64. Backup: T61p (8891-CTO)
Yes, I've done that.pae77 wrote:It might be worthwhile trying uninstalling ZA, rebooting and reinstalling ZA, if you haven't done that already.
Yes, I downloaded the latest version.Also, in ZoneAlarm iteslf, make sure you are running the latest version...
...and make sure that your AV program has full permissions.
It does.
Symantec is only AV, no firewall.Also, make sure the Symantec program doesn't already have a firewall component running...
I know, the only firewall I have is Windows Firewall and I turned it off - I'm looking for a replacement for it!Only one firewall should be running at a time.
Current: T60p (2007-93G). Previous: T23 (2647-9LG).
You might be interested in this firewall analysis I ran across earlier today.
http://www.matousec.com/projects/window ... esults.php
http://www.matousec.com/projects/window ... esults.php
DKB
Yes, that is what he removed before installing Zone Alarm.pae77 wrote: The program I can imagine would need to be removed from a stock TP for ZoneAlarm to work properly would be all the Symantec Norton stuff. There actually is a removal tool available from Symantec to help rid your machine of their atrocious and pernicious product.
You can read about it here:
http://forums.zonealarm.com/zonelabs/bo ... e.id=69106
That link in the previous post goes into great detail on how to get ZA working properly if one is experiencing the kind of problems described in this thread. I highly recommend reviewing the steps listed there.
HP DV8t | Intel i7-Q 720 | 6GB (DDR3 1333) RAM | 1 TB (500GB Seagate 7200 rpm x2)| GeForce GT 230M (1GB) | 18.4" FHD | SuperMulti 8X w Lightscribe | FP Reader | Bluetooth | HDTV Tuner | Win 7 Ultimate x64. Backup: T61p (8891-CTO)
By the way, if anyone is interested in checking out how well their current firewall is working, the site linked below provides some pretty cool free online tests.
http://www.grc.com
At that link, check out the links to "Shields Up!" which provides several tests and also the link to the "Leak Test." There is a very interesting discussion there concerning the Leak Test and which firewalls are deficient. The author of that site is critical of most firewalls but particularly critical of the Symantec solution. "LeakTest easily demonstrates that the various Symantec/Norton firewalls are among the least secure of all firewalls in the industry." http://www.grc.com/lt/howtouse.htm
According to the author of that site, ZA (and one other firewall, if set correctly) were the only firewalls tested to date which pass the leak test. "ZoneAlarm (and optionally the Tiny Personal Firewall) goes the extra mile of generating a "Cryptographic Signature" for every permitted program. This signature is then regenerated and compared before any program of that name is again allowed access. This completely prevents this simple form of trusted program impersonation, but NO OTHER FIREWALLS OFFER THIS CAPABILITY." (Capitals in original.) http://www.grc.com/lt/howtouse.htm
I think it is worthwhile to review the material presented at the above referenced site for those not already familiar with it. After reviewing that material I came to the conclusion that it is worth the extra hassle that may be involved in getting ZA functioning properly on one's system. If ZA doesn't work properly, imo, it frequently is indicative that there may be some other problem with the host system.
http://www.grc.com
At that link, check out the links to "Shields Up!" which provides several tests and also the link to the "Leak Test." There is a very interesting discussion there concerning the Leak Test and which firewalls are deficient. The author of that site is critical of most firewalls but particularly critical of the Symantec solution. "LeakTest easily demonstrates that the various Symantec/Norton firewalls are among the least secure of all firewalls in the industry." http://www.grc.com/lt/howtouse.htm
According to the author of that site, ZA (and one other firewall, if set correctly) were the only firewalls tested to date which pass the leak test. "ZoneAlarm (and optionally the Tiny Personal Firewall) goes the extra mile of generating a "Cryptographic Signature" for every permitted program. This signature is then regenerated and compared before any program of that name is again allowed access. This completely prevents this simple form of trusted program impersonation, but NO OTHER FIREWALLS OFFER THIS CAPABILITY." (Capitals in original.) http://www.grc.com/lt/howtouse.htm
I think it is worthwhile to review the material presented at the above referenced site for those not already familiar with it. After reviewing that material I came to the conclusion that it is worth the extra hassle that may be involved in getting ZA functioning properly on one's system. If ZA doesn't work properly, imo, it frequently is indicative that there may be some other problem with the host system.
HP DV8t | Intel i7-Q 720 | 6GB (DDR3 1333) RAM | 1 TB (500GB Seagate 7200 rpm x2)| GeForce GT 230M (1GB) | 18.4" FHD | SuperMulti 8X w Lightscribe | FP Reader | Bluetooth | HDTV Tuner | Win 7 Ultimate x64. Backup: T61p (8891-CTO)
I second the opinion about Kerio, specially if you have access to the full-license version (it's usually corporate). It gives you great control over most everything, and it's pretty effective - it's just not compatible with Vista yet.
X201 Pentium, 4 GB RAM, 320GB 7200RPM
T410 Core i5, 4 GB RAM, 500GB 7200RPM
X230 Core i5, 4 GB RAM, 500GB 7200RPM
T410 Core i5, 4 GB RAM, 500GB 7200RPM
X230 Core i5, 4 GB RAM, 500GB 7200RPM
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
Buying a T520 but... 4243-5GG crashes when install OS
by MTyn » Mon Mar 27, 2017 11:04 am » in ThinkPad T400/410/420 and T500/510/520 Series - 7 Replies
- 1060 Views
-
Last post by MTyn
Thu Mar 30, 2017 1:48 pm
-
-
- 42 Replies
- 2753 Views
-
Last post by taichi
Thu Jan 12, 2017 11:44 am
-
-
What LCD options do I have for a 15" T60p these days?
by jcitme » Tue Jan 17, 2017 3:50 am » in ThinkPad T6x Series - 15 Replies
- 2020 Views
-
Last post by Troels
Fri Feb 10, 2017 4:56 pm
-
-
- 7 Replies
- 1024 Views
-
Last post by thinkpadcollection
Mon Feb 06, 2017 7:48 pm
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: BigT0ny and 22 guests






