XGA on 12.1 versus SXGA+ on 12.1 screen?

X60/X61 series specific matters only.
Post Reply

IS 12.1 XGA pixelated?

Poll ended at Fri Aug 17, 2007 10:02 pm

YES
7
41%
NO
10
59%
 
Total votes: 17

Message
Author
mattbiernat
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1621
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 12:18 pm
Location: Brooklyn, NY

XGA on 12.1 versus SXGA+ on 12.1 screen?

#1 Post by mattbiernat » Wed Jul 18, 2007 8:06 pm

Is there really such a big difference between XGA and SXGA+ on such a small screen? I've read somewhere people complaining that XGA looks pixelated when compared to SXGA+ ... Does this also apply to the 12.1 inch screen?
Last edited by mattbiernat on Wed Jul 18, 2007 10:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

tomh009
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 3021
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 3:30 pm
Location: Kitchener, ON

#2 Post by tomh009 » Wed Jul 18, 2007 8:14 pm

I don't think XGA is pixelated on 12.1 -- but SXGA+ will provide you significantly greater sharpness and screen real estate. Whether that's critical is really a personal decision. (Pianowizard wouldn't live without it, but I just ordered an X61 with XGA.)
X220 (4287-2W5, Windows 8 Pro) / X31 (2672-CXU, XP Pro) / X61s (7668-CTO, Windows 8 Pro)

aphex
Sophomore Member
Posts: 180
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 2:11 pm
Location: Sarasota, FL

#3 Post by aphex » Wed Jul 18, 2007 8:39 pm

xga is just too low res for me... the SXGA+ on a 12.1 is the perfect res for me...

pianowizard
Senior ThinkPadder
Senior ThinkPadder
Posts: 8368
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:07 am
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Contact:

#4 Post by pianowizard » Wed Jul 18, 2007 8:49 pm

tomh009 wrote:(Pianowizard wouldn't live without it, but I just ordered an X61 with XGA.)
Actually, I don't mind spending ~$100US on an old X series to play with -- I briefly owned an X21 just last month. But I wouldn't want to pay any more than that for an XGA laptop.
Microsoft Surface 3 (Atom x7-Z8700 / 4GB / 128GB / LTE)
Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF (Core i3-3220 / 8GB / 8TB); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770 / 16GB / 9.25TB)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell 3008WFP, U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP

bhtooefr
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1370
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 1:02 pm
Location: Newark, Ohio
Contact:

#5 Post by bhtooefr » Wed Jul 18, 2007 9:47 pm

I can speak as the owner of an X21 (with the XGA screen - back then, that was the upgrade... :lol:) and a user of a demo model X61t with the SXGA+ screen (and the XGA screen is once again the upgrade! :lol:) that my company ordered in.

Myself, I find the SXGA+ screen to be quite excellent for my needs. The resolution is high enough to actually have some screen real estate, rather than being crammed into 1024x768 like I've been for the last few years. And, FOR ME, it's not too high. The one that my company is ordering for me will have this screen.

However, those with poor eyesight, or those that like to hook a wireless keyboard and mouse up, and kick back with the laptop on their coffee table will hate it. (Hey, I know people like this...)

For comparison purposes, I'll put dpi here.

15" QXGA: 170 dpi (highest end laptop LCD IBM has ever sold, R5x only)
12.1" SXGA+: 144 dpi
14.1" WSXGA+: 141 dpi
15" UXGA: 133 dpi
15" WSXGA+: 132 dpi
14.1" SXGA+: 124 dpi
15" SXGA+: 117 dpi
14.1" WXGA: 107 dpi
12.1" XGA: 106 dpi
15" WXGA: 101 dpi
14.1" XGA: 91 dpi
15" XGA: 85 dpi

I only covered ThinkPad screens. No Lenovo 3000 screens. I think I got everything in the 30's on up. Bolded are the screens that we're comparing.

Lower the DPI, easier to read. Compare against your current screen to see how much of an impact it is. Although, on a 12.1", I find that my face ends up close to the laptop anyway.
Current: 365XD (120 MHz, 72 MiB, 6.4 GB, 4x CD-ROM, 10.4" TFT)
Past: T61p 15.0" QXGA, T60p 15.0" QXGA, X61 Tablet SXGA+, R51e 14.1" XGA, X21

dr_st
Senior ThinkPadder
Senior ThinkPadder
Posts: 6656
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 6:20 am

#6 Post by dr_st » Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:44 am

12.1" XGA does not look pixelated - it looks smooth and quite sharp.

Lack of real estate can be a problem.

Personally, although my eyesight is fine (*knocks on wood*), I wouldn't want to stress my eyes by SXGA+ below 14".

bhtooefr
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1370
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 1:02 pm
Location: Newark, Ohio
Contact:

#7 Post by bhtooefr » Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:36 am

Agreed. I'd almost say my X21 was better looking WITHOUT ClearType than, say, my R51e with it. (Same resolution, 12.1 XGA on the X21, 14.1 XGA on the R51e.) It's all in the pixel density.

Note that the 12.1" XGA is right with the WXGA screens (which are fairly dense) and not too far off of even a 15" SXGA+ screen.
Current: 365XD (120 MHz, 72 MiB, 6.4 GB, 4x CD-ROM, 10.4" TFT)
Past: T61p 15.0" QXGA, T60p 15.0" QXGA, X61 Tablet SXGA+, R51e 14.1" XGA, X21

pianowizard
Senior ThinkPadder
Senior ThinkPadder
Posts: 8368
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:07 am
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Contact:

#8 Post by pianowizard » Thu Jul 19, 2007 7:34 am

mattbiernat wrote:Is there really such a big difference between XGA and SXGA+ on such a small screen? I've read somewhere people complaining that XGA looks pixelated when compared to SXGA+
I don't recall people complaining about pixelationg. It's the limited real estate of XGA that people don't like. SXGA+ gives 86.9% more working area than XGA.
bhtooefr wrote:For comparison purposes, I'll put dpi here.

15" QXGA: 170 dpi (highest end laptop LCD IBM has ever sold, R5x only)
12.1" SXGA+: 144 dpi...
Let me add one in between these two:

15.4" WUXGA (available for Z61p and T61p): 147.0 dpi

And BTW, the 15.0" QXGA has 170.7 dpi, so I guess one should round that up to 171.
Microsoft Surface 3 (Atom x7-Z8700 / 4GB / 128GB / LTE)
Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF (Core i3-3220 / 8GB / 8TB); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770 / 16GB / 9.25TB)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell 3008WFP, U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP

NaT
Sophomore Member
Posts: 137
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 6:13 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

#9 Post by NaT » Tue Jul 24, 2007 12:28 am

I went to research for my new laptop yesterday. While I couldn't find a Lenovo X61 Tablet in store, I found the fujitsu ones instead with same screen size and profile. (12.1" XGA)

I can say that XGA is about the comfortable size for reading most text and working on documents in "tablet" mode; reading documents, browsing web, using digitizing pen in the tablet mode.

But my own preference if I were to buy one, I'd prefer SXGA+ because my field of work. SXGA+ gives me much more working area and I am very comfortable with its dpi (144dpi). Actually I had worked with 1920x1200 15.4" (147dpi) before and really love it, BUT this is based solely on your preference. (I'm working with 1600x1200 15" T43p every day and I think the font can be smaller!! )

Oh, one Fujitsu has 8.9" with WXGA 1280x800 (170dpi), that one is too small to work with.
----
T43p P-M 2.13GHz, 2GB RAM, 15" UXGA

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Thinkpad X6x Series incl. X6x Tablet”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests