Batteries: X60s vs X61s

X60/X61 series specific matters only.
Post Reply
Message
Author
Jackboot
Sophomore Member
Posts: 168
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 4:38 am
Location: Calgary, Canada
Contact:

Batteries: X60s vs X61s

#1 Post by Jackboot » Thu Jul 19, 2007 11:23 am

Why are the batteries for the X60s and X61s different?

In the power manager under "battery information" my X60s says the FRU part number is 42T5249 while the X61s says the FRU part number is 93P5030.

Why would the FRU part numbers be different? Shouldn't they take the same replacement battery?

Additionally, My X60s battery (Sanyo) holds a full capacity charge of 80.34 Wh despite the design capacity being only 74.88 Wh. That is a significant difference! My X61s battery (Sony) holds a full capacity charge of exactly 74.88 Wh (same as design capacity).

tomh009
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 3021
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 3:30 pm
Location: Kitchener, ON

#2 Post by tomh009 » Thu Jul 19, 2007 11:56 am

There are frequently multiple battery FRUs that are interchangeable. The HMM lists the following 8-cell batteries:

Sanyo 92P1171
Sony 92P1173

and

Sanyo 93P5029
Sanyo 42T4506
Sanyo 40Y7904
Sony 93P5030

I didn't find a 42T5249 listed, though.
X220 (4287-2W5, Windows 8 Pro) / X31 (2672-CXU, XP Pro) / X61s (7668-CTO, Windows 8 Pro)

gunston
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1306
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 8:00 am
Location: Brisbane, QLD AUST
Contact:

#3 Post by gunston » Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:58 pm

how long can the battery life last for these 2 different models?
1. T43 2668-B97 14" SXGA+ 1.5G RAM 9cells
2. X60s 1703-CA3 powerful

tomh009
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 3021
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 3:30 pm
Location: Kitchener, ON

#4 Post by tomh009 » Thu Jul 19, 2007 7:40 pm

Apart from potential battery explosions :) the Li-ion batteries really have very similar characteristics and their life is primarily determined by your usage patterns.

So what does that mean? Well, my trusty X31 has 29.37 Wh of remaining capacity out of the original 47.52 Wh. Not stellar, but at 62% of original, it's by no means dead yet. And that's after two and a half years 825 charge cycles, so you can indeed get a lot out of a Li-ion battery!
X220 (4287-2W5, Windows 8 Pro) / X31 (2672-CXU, XP Pro) / X61s (7668-CTO, Windows 8 Pro)

Comage
Sophomore Member
Posts: 125
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 6:55 pm
Location: The City/State of Singapore

#5 Post by Comage » Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:44 pm

You should try performing a battery reset in your power manager, the readings are definitely off.

tomh009
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 3021
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 3:30 pm
Location: Kitchener, ON

#6 Post by tomh009 » Fri Jul 20, 2007 4:54 am

Why do you think the readings are off? And in what way?
X220 (4287-2W5, Windows 8 Pro) / X31 (2672-CXU, XP Pro) / X61s (7668-CTO, Windows 8 Pro)

Comage
Sophomore Member
Posts: 125
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 6:55 pm
Location: The City/State of Singapore

#7 Post by Comage » Fri Jul 20, 2007 6:53 am

I meant that it being "off" in a sense that the current listed full capacity charge being higher than the design capacity.

I encountered that problem initially too. It had gone from a value same as the design capacity, to a value higher (which I then performed a reset).

The battery had actually lost capacity at that point of time, but something was wrong with the estimation of power manager, so the values went off, higher than the designed value.

Nothing much to worry about that though.

tomh009
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 3021
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 3:30 pm
Location: Kitchener, ON

#8 Post by tomh009 » Fri Jul 20, 2007 7:14 am

Yes, the "full charge capacity" is an estimate and can drift ... though in my case it's well down by now.
X220 (4287-2W5, Windows 8 Pro) / X31 (2672-CXU, XP Pro) / X61s (7668-CTO, Windows 8 Pro)

Jackboot
Sophomore Member
Posts: 168
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 4:38 am
Location: Calgary, Canada
Contact:

#9 Post by Jackboot » Fri Jul 20, 2007 12:09 pm

Comage wrote:I meant that it being "off" in a sense that the current listed full capacity charge being higher than the design capacity.

I encountered that problem initially too. It had gone from a value same as the design capacity, to a value higher (which I then performed a reset).

The battery had actually lost capacity at that point of time, but something was wrong with the estimation of power manager, so the values went off, higher than the designed value.

Nothing much to worry about that though.
The battery I have for my X60s with the full capacity higher than the design capacity is brand new - only 6 charge cycles - and it has been like this from new.

Do you really think it needs a reset? Isn't it possible for a battery to have a higher full capacity than its design capacity?

Comage
Sophomore Member
Posts: 125
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 6:55 pm
Location: The City/State of Singapore

#10 Post by Comage » Fri Jul 20, 2007 10:11 pm

Well it won't result in any performance issues, so you can leave it there if you wish too.

Sometimes batteries stay in warehouses for quite some time before they are shipped out to customers, so that might account for the difference.

However, I would check to make sure that the battery drains "linearly" (i.e. there is no jump from like 70% to 60% under a constant power load). If there is, it means the li-ion crystals have crystalised (memory effect).

I had one Sanyo exchanged within the first year because it exhibited this problem.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Thinkpad X6x Series incl. X6x Tablet”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests