Unbalanced RAM sticks in T60/61

T60/T61 series specific matters only
Post Reply
Message
Author
SkiBunny
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 520
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 6:51 pm
Location: Canada

Unbalanced RAM sticks in T60/61

#1 Post by SkiBunny » Sun Jul 22, 2007 12:14 pm

Is there anything wasteful or bad about having two different-sized RAM sticks in a T60 or T61 (eg. one 2G and one 1G or 0.5G) ? Assuming both sticks are the same speed. I thought someone once wrote that both sticks should be the same size.
W530 2447HU5 | W520 428424U | T520 4243WD1 | T520 4243B37 | T420 4180AC7 | W500 4063GW2 | W500 406333U | X60 170997U | T60 1951A31 | T43 266889U

tomh009
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 3021
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 3:30 pm
Location: Kitchener, ON

#2 Post by tomh009 » Sun Jul 22, 2007 12:19 pm

Two identical modules will enable the system to use the memory in dual-channel mode, theoretically doubling the memory bandwidth. A pure memory bandwidth benchmark will show a big difference, but in practical terms most CPU-intensive benchmarks will show a gain of maybe 2-5% in a dual-channel configuration.
X220 (4287-2W5, Windows 8 Pro) / X31 (2672-CXU, XP Pro) / X61s (7668-CTO, Windows 8 Pro)

SkiBunny
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 520
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 6:51 pm
Location: Canada

#3 Post by SkiBunny » Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:16 pm

Thanks, i thought it was something like that. But I dont understand the practical implications of having two different-sized DDR2 PC5300 sticks.

Most apps ppl use would tend to be I/O-bound or swapping memory, rather than CPU-bound (i think)

So what would be better?...
a) 2x512MB (identical size)
b) 1x1GB + 1x512MB (different sizes but more RAM)

tomh009
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 3021
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 3:30 pm
Location: Kitchener, ON

#4 Post by tomh009 » Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:20 pm

As you said, memory (availability) and I/O are the bottlenecks: more memory trumps any other improvement (with disk performance probably second). So I would suggest going for the 1.5 GB configuration, and I will be doing the same on my X61, using 1+2 GB modules for 3 GB total.
X220 (4287-2W5, Windows 8 Pro) / X31 (2672-CXU, XP Pro) / X61s (7668-CTO, Windows 8 Pro)

SkiBunny
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 520
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 6:51 pm
Location: Canada

#5 Post by SkiBunny » Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:37 pm

Thanks! So I will just add someone's dirt-cheap throw-away 0.5gb to the 1gb on my t60 running XP
Whereas I guess adding 2GB to 1GB is the price you pay for vista, lol

Thanks!

Harryc
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 13228
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 8:23 am
Location: Upstate New York

#6 Post by Harryc » Sun Jul 22, 2007 4:02 pm

Just wanted to add using that (2) 'identical' modules to produce dual channel does not necessarily mean the manufacturers need to be the same. I have 1GB Elpida and 1GB Crucial in my T60 and it is definitely running dual channel.

laowai
Sophomore Member
Posts: 126
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 1:37 pm
Location: Beijing China

#7 Post by laowai » Sun Jul 22, 2007 4:10 pm

I have a 1 and a 2g stick in mine. Unless they come up with a way to actually enable the full 4g, swapping the 1 for another 2 is too much of a waste. It works fine though

jgrobertson
Sophomore Member
Posts: 230
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 2:13 pm
Location: Rockville, MD

#8 Post by jgrobertson » Sun Jul 22, 2007 5:14 pm

Two identical modules will enable the system to use the memory in dual-channel mode, theoretically doubling the memory bandwidth. A pure memory bandwidth benchmark will show a big difference, but in practical terms most CPU-intensive benchmarks will show a gain of maybe 2-5% in a dual-channel configuration.
With a T60 which has the 3 GByte ram limit, would putting two 2 GByte sticks in give it dual channel? Right now I have a 1 and 2 for 3 total. I still have another 1 and could go back to 2 GByte total. Would that be better or is it better to have 3 GByte with unbalanced sizes.
jgrobertson

tomh009
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 3021
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 3:30 pm
Location: Kitchener, ON

#9 Post by tomh009 » Sun Jul 22, 2007 6:04 pm

For most applications, 1+2 GB will likely provide better performance than 1+1 GB.
X220 (4287-2W5, Windows 8 Pro) / X31 (2672-CXU, XP Pro) / X61s (7668-CTO, Windows 8 Pro)

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “ThinkPad T6x Series”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests