ATI Mobility FireGL V5250 256M VS nVIDIA Quadro FX 570M 256M

[mr_haze123]

Hi,

I'm trying to find a comparison benchmark between these 2 cards but I've been unsuccessful so far...I wanna play game like Far Cry and stuff like this.

Anyone can help?


Thanks a lot!


Mat Del

[sktn77a]

Well, neither are gaming GPUs but, having said that, I got some pretty good performance with the Radeon 9600 in my T42.

[Pascal_TTH]

Both are powerfull enough to run FarCry.

[mr_haze123]

still...which one is better?

[Pascal_TTH]

Witch Quadro do you speak about ? NVS 140m is a bit less powerfull then FireGL V5200. Quadro FX 570m is about two time more powerfull then the Quadro NVS 140m.

[mr_haze123]

nVIDIA Quadro FX 570M 256 Mb

[Pascal_TTH]

nVIDIA Quadro FX 570M 256 Mb

So, what I tell before is right.

[mr_haze123]

alright, thanks a lot guys; I appreciate!

[Pascal_TTH]

Here is a link to my 3D Mark 2005 laptops database :

http://forum.tt-hardware.com/topic-8173 ... t-2005.htm

3D Mark 2005 is a graphic benchmark witch show a GPU performs in common games. The chart is : laptop, processor, graphic, 3D Mark 2005 score. Higher is better and better ones are at the top.

[Esben]

I believe 3DMark measures performance by testing the shader units in the 3d-card, where the Quadro has much faster shader units.
Far Cry on the other hand is an older game, which means it's more fill-rate dependant. Both cards should run the game well.
If I had the choice between the two, the V5250 would have to be greatly discounted for me in order choose that one.
The Quadro 570M (8600M GT) is more future proof, and has higher performance overall.

[Kamika007z]

What stinks is that you can only get a 128MB version of the nVidia Quadro FX 570M when configuring the T61p 14.1" variant.

While my T60p 14.1" has a ATi FireGL V5200 256MB flavor.

Does anyone know if the 128MB nVidia card still beats the 256MB ATi card?

Thanks in advance.

[Pascal_TTH]

I know : yes ! There is other files about this. Some one post some benchmarks.

[Kamika007z]

Any benchmarks for the 256MB version and the 128MB version for comparison would be great!

Thanks!

[Pascal_TTH]

Any benchmarks for the 256MB version and the 128MB version for comparison would be great!

Thanks!

About 3300 at 3D Mark 2006 for 256 MB and 2300 for the 128 MB.

This file : http://forum.thinkpads.com/viewtopic.php?t=48346

[codek]

Here is a link to my 3D Mark 2005 laptops database :

http://forum.tt-hardware.com/topic-8173 ... t-2005.htm

3D Mark 2005 is a graphic benchmark witch show a GPU performs in common games. The chart is : laptop, processor, graphic, 3D Mark 2005 score. Higher is better and better ones are at the top.

the quadro 570m (256) really got a 7500 on 3dmark05?

[Pascal_TTH]

Here is a link to my 3D Mark 2005 laptops database :

http://forum.tt-hardware.com/topic-8173 ... t-2005.htm

3D Mark 2005 is a graphic benchmark witch show a GPU performs in common games. The chart is : laptop, processor, graphic, 3D Mark 2005 score. Higher is better and better ones are at the top.

the quadro 570m (256) really got a 7500 on 3dmark05?

Yes, someone post it in this forum. Also see same kind of result in other forums.