dyne wrote:timendres wrote:
You state that this is not a serious functionality issue, and it is only cosmetic. I beg to differ. Since the first week of owning my "tablet" computer, I have refused to put it into tablet mode because of this issue. I repeat: I am afraid the plastic bezel is going to CRACK. Not to mention the accumulation of "crap in the gap" that this design flaw has created. Ergo, no tablet mode. Ergo MAJOR FUNCTIONALITY ISSUE.
You know how flexible plastic is, right? The only real source of stress on the plastic (as far as I can tell) is from the screws and clips holding the entire assembly together. I doubt keeping it in laptop mode offers much, if any, more stress relief than if it were in tablet mode.
Not to mention both issues you mentioned were still cosmetic. The major functionality 'issue' you have is that you don't want to 'risk' it getting any worse.
Apparently I am confused. I was under the impression that the bezel was what held the LCD in place. I was also under the impression that the bezel was designed to keep dust and other small objects away from the LCD's vulnerable areas. In other words, it was designed to be "snug" with the display front. Thus, I assumed that as the bezel disintegrated the LCD display would not be properly supported and more vulnerable to dust and small object invasion. So, yes, I did not want to risk it getting worse.
I do realize that plastic is flexible, which would seem to be an argument for why this design is
flawed. The problem appears to be unexpected and unacceptable flexing of the bezel. That seems to be a flaw. Yes, it could be that the bezels were not manufactured to specification, but otherwise it is a
design flaw, which should have never been shipped.
And you are correct. More and more the bezel is separating from the LCD in laptop mode also! The problem gets worse with every opening of the display! It used to be that the bezel would return to a snug fit against the LCD once it was in laptop mode, but now it never does. It continues to get worse.
dyne wrote:timendres wrote:
People continue to insist that Lenovo is not silent on this issue. Are we using different dictionaries? Please show me where Lenovo has made ANY official comment on this problem. Please. Otherwise, I continue to insist on the word SILENT.
They haven't made an official statement, as far as I can tell. I don't see how that automatically makes them silent on the issue, as they're currently working with people on the issue
I keep hearing this "they're currently working with people on the issue". WHAT PEOPLE? Can anyone in this forum reply to this thread and state that they have been contacted directly by Lenovo to assist in solving this problem? I don't mean you have called support and gotten some promise, or that you have made a warranty claim. I want to hear from someone who has been contacted directly by Lenovo
engineers regarding this problem. I realize you may not be able to say anything about the conversation, since that may be confidential. But I have yet to see anyone post here that they have been directly contacted regarding this problem. Just people repeating what seems to me to be a rumor.
In my opinion, Lenovo should have already contacted
every owner of this machine to let them know that Lenovo is aware of this serious problem and that they will make it right.
dyne wrote:timendres wrote:
When Lenovo acquired the ThinkPad line, friends told me to move on. But I insisted that Lenovo be given a chance to prove that they could carry on the tradition. So far, they are falling down, and I see no reason to think it will improve.
I don't think they're quite as good as they used to be, but I highly doubt they're any worse than all the other laptop manufacturers
If Lenovo is now aiming for "not any worse than all the other laptop manufacturers", then they should adjust their prices to reflect this new "standard".