POP3 vs IMAP - which is better for me?
-
jamess
- Junior Member

- Posts: 377
- Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 3:45 pm
- Location: Ljubljana, Slovenia, European Union
POP3 vs IMAP - which is better for me?
In a few days I'll be setting up a new ThinkPad. Amongst many, I have a question regarding my email.
I will be using Office 2007 and therefore Outlook as my mail program.
I've been using POP3 for years now, but I've realised that IMAP might be a good choice given that I use my thinkpad laptop, desktop, my cell phone and various other locations to access my email.
However, my (server) mailbox is only 200 MB in size. Since i handle a lot of email and it takes about 3 GB/year, I can't have ALL my mail residing in server mailbox.
Since I haven't really used IMAP and don't know how it handles big emails with attachements etc., I'd be happy if you can share a thought.
Also - if I use IMAP, can I simply have say about 14 days of recent emails stored in my mailbox on the server and "transfer" the rest to local repository for archive in outlook 2007 or not?
Help appreciated.
I will be using Office 2007 and therefore Outlook as my mail program.
I've been using POP3 for years now, but I've realised that IMAP might be a good choice given that I use my thinkpad laptop, desktop, my cell phone and various other locations to access my email.
However, my (server) mailbox is only 200 MB in size. Since i handle a lot of email and it takes about 3 GB/year, I can't have ALL my mail residing in server mailbox.
Since I haven't really used IMAP and don't know how it handles big emails with attachements etc., I'd be happy if you can share a thought.
Also - if I use IMAP, can I simply have say about 14 days of recent emails stored in my mailbox on the server and "transfer" the rest to local repository for archive in outlook 2007 or not?
Help appreciated.
IMAP stores your email on someone else's server and not on your PC. So you need to be really certain of the integrity and longevity of the supplier. Also you need to be connected to get your email.
Oddly enough, I had it suggested to me by people I still know and use (although now a different company and server). I thought about it and felt then and continue to feel now that POP is a better approach for an individual.
I have mail in my current Outlook file going back to 1996. I started internet email in late 1994 so I have most of it. I have not had the same supplier all that time, so IMAP just would not have worked for me. ... JDH
Oddly enough, I had it suggested to me by people I still know and use (although now a different company and server). I thought about it and felt then and continue to feel now that POP is a better approach for an individual.
I have mail in my current Outlook file going back to 1996. I started internet email in late 1994 so I have most of it. I have not had the same supplier all that time, so IMAP just would not have worked for me. ... JDH
-
jamess
- Junior Member

- Posts: 377
- Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 3:45 pm
- Location: Ljubljana, Slovenia, European Union
I was actually thinking of having only the very recent emails on my provider's server and moving all the rest into my local inbox folder. However I don't know if that "goes" ok and also if that's not just more steps to be taken. I usually only delete emails with huge attachements and save them where they belong but I keep the rest.
As for the outlook and your email dating so far back... Based on your experience, outlook should handle big inbox pst file fine? I've had a crash a couple of years ago supposedly because of the outlook 2003 inbox file growing too big. I've used ThunderBird after that which was supposed to handle big inbox folder better... but have recently decided to go back to outlook once again... and now the question is IMAP or POP3...
As for the outlook and your email dating so far back... Based on your experience, outlook should handle big inbox pst file fine? I've had a crash a couple of years ago supposedly because of the outlook 2003 inbox file growing too big. I've used ThunderBird after that which was supposed to handle big inbox folder better... but have recently decided to go back to outlook once again... and now the question is IMAP or POP3...
Outlook 2003 handles PST files up to 20 GB, assuming it's the new Unicode format (the default in Outlook 2003). I have some 15 GB of archived email (in multiple PST files) myself ...jdhurst wrote:Outlook 2003 should be able to handle a 2Gb .PST file. Mine is about 800 Mb. Sometime I should archive some of the stuff.
X220 (4287-2W5, Windows 8 Pro) / X31 (2672-CXU, XP Pro) / X61s (7668-CTO, Windows 8 Pro)
What I do (to answer your last point) is use Pop Tray. This is a little daemon that runs in the system tray and collects email. You can delete from Pop Tray if you don't need the email anywhere.
I then set Outlook on both computers to "Leave the mail on the server". At the end of the day, when I can see I have downloaded email to both computers, I use Pop Tray to delete the whole lot.
This is also convenient because I use a BlackBerry in addition to two computers.
... JDH
I then set Outlook on both computers to "Leave the mail on the server". At the end of the day, when I can see I have downloaded email to both computers, I use Pop Tray to delete the whole lot.
This is also convenient because I use a BlackBerry in addition to two computers.
... JDH
Another tip for Outlook users (POP, Exchange, or IMAP): You can open an email that contains an attachement, save the attachment, and then remove it from the email without deleting the email. You can even add a comment in the email to say where you saved the attachment.
Why? Attachments account for the vast bulk of space in email files. Text emails are very small. ... JDH
Why? Attachments account for the vast bulk of space in email files. Text emails are very small. ... JDH
-
rkawakami
- Admin

- Posts: 10055
- Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2006 1:26 am
- Location: San Jose, CA 95120 USA
- Contact:
Uhh.... what has this to do with Vista? 
P.S. You can delete this post when you figure out which conference is best. I think Off Topic is right but I'll leave that up to you guys.
P.S. You can delete this post when you figure out which conference is best. I think Off Topic is right but I'll leave that up to you guys.
Ray Kawakami
X22 X24 X31 X41 X41T X60 X60s X61 X61s X200 X200s X300 X301 Z60m Z61t Z61p 560 560Z 600 600E 600X T21 T22 T23 T41 T60p T410 T420 T520 W500 W520 R50 A21p A22p A31 A31p
NOTE: All links to PC-Doctor software hosted by me are dead. Files removed 8/28/12 by manufacturer's demand.
X22 X24 X31 X41 X41T X60 X60s X61 X61s X200 X200s X300 X301 Z60m Z61t Z61p 560 560Z 600 600E 600X T21 T22 T23 T41 T60p T410 T420 T520 W500 W520 R50 A21p A22p A31 A31p
NOTE: All links to PC-Doctor software hosted by me are dead. Files removed 8/28/12 by manufacturer's demand.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
Which Ultrabay Slim batteries fit which ThinkPads?
by bakery2k » Fri Apr 14, 2017 8:45 am » in Thinkpad - General HARDWARE/SOFTWARE questions - 3 Replies
- 747 Views
-
Last post by dr_st
Fri Apr 14, 2017 9:38 pm
-
-
- 28 Replies
- 4747 Views
-
Last post by nforce4max
Sat Jun 10, 2017 10:52 pm
-
-
Which fan for 41V9748?
by Andrew479 » Tue Jan 17, 2017 7:44 am » in Thinkpad X6x Series incl. X6x Tablet - 4 Replies
- 1932 Views
-
Last post by jaspen-meyer
Thu Jan 26, 2017 3:01 pm
-
-
-
Which Thinkpads are the durable ones?
by marlinspike » Sat Feb 18, 2017 8:32 pm » in Thinkpad - General HARDWARE/SOFTWARE questions - 18 Replies
- 2080 Views
-
Last post by Nodrogchavez
Mon Mar 06, 2017 11:05 pm
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests





