Hybrid hard drives (like Samsung 160GB) useful?

T60/T61 series specific matters only
Post Reply
Message
Author
Steve06
Freshman Member
Posts: 69
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 12:51 pm
Location: Frankfurt/Germany

Hybrid hard drives (like Samsung 160GB) useful?

#1 Post by Steve06 » Sun Sep 16, 2007 3:14 pm

Hi,
I wonder if one of the new so-called hybrid hard drives, like the Samsung SpinPoint MH80 160GB/256MB Flash SATA (HM16HJI) would be of any use as a replacement of one of the standard hard drives the T61 ships with.
1. Do you think it speeds up the loading of applications?
2. Do you think the flash saves battery life?
3. Is the T61's Active Protection System part of the hard drive? So does the Samsung offer similar protection?

As a con I read that the hard drive's life could be limited due to flash memory, since flash memory chips only allow for a certain number of writes.

Thank you for any comments.

Steve

erik
moderator
moderator
Posts: 3596
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 12:52 pm
Location: United States

#2 Post by erik » Mon Sep 17, 2007 1:40 am

from my limited homework a 7200 rpm drive is still markedly faster than a hybrid.

active protection is compatible with any rotating hard drive.   the computer's gyroscope senses excess movement and sends a call to the HDD to unmount, regardless of brand/size drive installed (except SSDs).
ThinkStation P700 · C20 | ThinkPad P40 · 600

SHoTTa35
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1597
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 6:20 pm
Location: Wash, DC
Contact:

#3 Post by SHoTTa35 » Mon Sep 17, 2007 1:14 pm

well compared to the benchmarks it seems to load stuff faster. The flash RAM is good especially in Vista. Windows XP i don't think will take much advantage of it but with Vista and ReadyDrive you can shut down and boot up much faster and Vista (or the drive - not sure which) loads lots of data into the HD NAND Flash so that when the user requests it the data is loaded up without any delay :)

The other benefit is that they have the fast access time (loading like before) but they allow the mechanical portion of the drive to shut down therefore saving power. The laptop should run longer as the platters only spin up to get new data not already in the cache then shuts back down after a while. With Vista's learning habbits all your frequently used stuff will probably get loaded so it wont use the platters that much.
Current - Thinkpad T410si - Core i3 330m, 4GB, 250GB 5400RPM, WXGA+, FPR, BT, Camera, DVDRW, Gobi2000, Win7 Pro x32
Past - Thinkpad T410 - T400 - T61 - T60 - T43 - T42 - T41 - T40 - T23 - 600X

DAH
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 506
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 6:44 pm
Location: Ohio

#4 Post by DAH » Mon Sep 17, 2007 1:58 pm

Seems to me that people are forgetting, we are only talking about 256MB not even half a GB of flash. My T60p has two GB of memory that is going to be way faster than the 256 MB of flash. Vista, the OS would not even fit on the first hard drive that I own. That 256 MB of flash will need to be loaded and read 8 times to fill my memory. Seems to me that all that will happen for most users is a lot more power up and power down of the hard drive. And powering up the hard drive and bringing it to 7200 rpm will involve a lot more power consumption than maintain the drive at 7200 rpm.

Give it say 10 GB of flash ram and I would be interested, with only 256 MB, I'd want some one else to work the bugs out.
Image ThinkPad T60p T7600 4 GB RAM 320 GB 7200 RPM HD Vista Ultimate Service Pack 2 5.1 4.7 4.2 4.6 5.8

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “ThinkPad T6x Series”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ChrisJ9876 and 15 guests