Solaris, RedHat, FreeBSD and the like
-
dodik
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 12:12 pm
#1
Post
by dodik » Sat Nov 06, 2004 11:48 am
Does anyone have ever configured wpa pre-shared key on his T42 with the intel pro wireless 2200 BG ?
I tried so, but I can authentificate my wlan on my router (a linksys wag54g). I use debian sid and wpa_supplicant. Here goes my config file :
Code: Select all
network={
ssid="myssid"
proto=WPA
key_mgmt=WPA-PSK
pairwise=CCMP TKIP
group=CCMP TKIP WEP104 WEP40 psk=b6499198511b57cc32ea0feede563d308a5b9661ffd67262b7f62655a1bfa8be
priority=2
}

ThinkPad T42 2373-CXG Pentium-m 1,8GHz, 512Mo DDR, ATI Radeon 9600 64Mo, Hitachi TravelStar 5K80, DVD/CD-RW, 802.11 b/g, Bluetooth, 15'' SXGA+
-
jdhurst
- Admin

- Posts: 5831
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 6:49 am
- Location: Toronto, Canada
#2
Post
by jdhurst » Sat Nov 06, 2004 5:02 pm
I set up a T42 with an Intel 2200BG card in it for a client. I had trouble with WPA PSK and had to "open" my router for it to work (that is, turn on SSID broadcasting). As soon as I turned off broadcasting, the connection would drop. Newest drivers and all. It works fine for the client using WEP. I continue to dislike Intel Wireless Cards. Centrino = Hype.
... JDHurst
-
dodik
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 12:12 pm
#3
Post
by dodik » Sun Nov 07, 2004 5:18 am
But, basically, I do Not want to broadcast my ssid !!!


ThinkPad T42 2373-CXG Pentium-m 1,8GHz, 512Mo DDR, ATI Radeon 9600 64Mo, Hitachi TravelStar 5K80, DVD/CD-RW, 802.11 b/g, Bluetooth, 15'' SXGA+
-
puco
- Freshman Member
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 12:28 am
- Location: Slovakia
#4
Post
by puco » Sun Nov 07, 2004 8:08 am
I read that WPA is not supported on ipw2200 (v 0.12) but it's planned. Why do you want to turn broadcast ssid off. When someone is passive scanning he finds your network anyway. Or not?
IBM ThinkPad T42 2378-FVU: Pentium M 735 (1.7GHz), 768MB RAM, Radeon 9600 64MB, 14.1" SXGA+, Intel PRO/Wireless 2200BG
-
jdhurst
- Admin

- Posts: 5831
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 6:49 am
- Location: Toronto, Canada
#5
Post
by jdhurst » Sun Nov 07, 2004 9:26 am
puco wrote:I read that WPA is not supported on ipw2200 (v 0.12) but it's planned. Why do you want to turn broadcast ssid off. When someone is passive scanning he finds your network anyway. Or not?
I keep my broadcast off. When someone is passive scanning, they can't see your network. I tried Netstumbler and a couple of other scanners and I could not see my network with my laptop with broadcasting turned off.
... JDHurst
-
level
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 7:01 pm
-
Contact:
#6
Post
by level » Sun Nov 07, 2004 11:16 am
Kismet will identity a network with SSID turned off as a "cloaked" network. As soon as you associate with your wireless router, if Kismet is still passively monitoring, it will display your SSID.
-
lfeagan
- Junior Member

- Posts: 445
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 11:04 pm
- Location: Leawood, KS
-
Contact:
#7
Post
by lfeagan » Mon Nov 08, 2004 1:06 pm
True, Kismet can find it. Turning off SSID isn't really any security anyways if someone really is targeting you. Security through obscurity is no security at all. If you run WPA and restrict access by MAC I would think your security level should be high enough for most uses both home user and corporate unless you deal with extremely sensitive information (eg. you work for the CIA and have the name and locations of covert operatives).

T61p (6459CTO)|T9500|15.4" WUXGA-4GB|200GB FDE|256MB nVidia FX570M|Atheros|Cingular WWAN|openSuSE 11.0
T42p (2373GVU)|PentiumM 1.8GHz|2GB|100GB|ATI FireGL T2|Atheros|openSuSE 10.3
WaterField Designs Cargo + Sleeve
-
Guest
#8
Post
by Guest » Tue Nov 09, 2004 7:25 am
But, I don't think this comes from the broadcast of the ssid, just have a look to the log as follow :
Code: Select all
--- START OF LOG -----
Configuration file '/etc/wpa_supplicant.conf' -> '/etc/wpa_supplicant.conf'
Reading configuration file '/etc/wpa_supplicant.conf'
ctrl_interface='/var/run/wpa_supplicant'
ctrl_interface_group=0
eapol_version=1
Line: 5 - start of a new network block
SSID - hexdump_ascii(len=9):
63 6c 61 72 61 2e 6c 61 6e clara.lan
proto: 0x1
key_mgmt: 0x2
pairwise: 0x18
group: 0x1c
PSK (ASCII passphrase) - hexdump_ascii(len=12):
74 68 69 73 69 73 74 68 65 6b 65 79 thisisthekey
PSK (from passphrase) - hexdump(len=32): b6 49 91 98 51 1b 57 cc 32 ea 0f ee
de 56 3d 30 8a 5b 96 61 ff d6 72 62 b7 f6 26 55 a1 bf a8 be
Priority group 0
id=0 ssid='clara.lan'
Setting scan request: 0 sec 100000 usec
Starting AP scan (broadcast SSID)
Scan timeout - try to get results
Received 609 bytes of scan results (2 BSSes)
Scan results: 2
Selecting BSS from priority group 0
0: 00:0f:66:58:ae:99 ssid='' wpa_ie_len=24 rsn_ie_len=0
skip - SSID mismatch
1: 00:0f:66:58:ae:99 ssid='clara.lan' wpa_ie_len=24 rsn_ie_len=0
selected
Trying to associate with 00:0f:66:58:ae:99 (SSID='clara.lan' freq=2462 MHz)
Cancelling scan request
WPA: using IEEE 802.11i/D3.0
WPA: Own WPA IE - hexdump(len=24): dd 16 00 50 f2 01 01 00 00 50 f2 02 01 00
00 50 f2 02 01 00 00 50 f2 02
Setting authentication timeout: 5 sec 0 usec
Authentication with 00:00:00:00:00:00 timed out.
---- END OF LOG ---
I can't managed to authentificate my wlan card on the router. I tried everything (changing psk value from ascci to hex and so so). Please help me.
-
avatar
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:14 am
#9
Post
by avatar » Fri Feb 18, 2005 8:42 pm
If I remembered correctly, wpa_supplicant wouldn't work if the AP doesn't broadcast the SSID. The same rule applys on Linux and FreeBSD.
IMHO, since you're going to use WPA, nobody would be able to connect to your WLAN unless he/she knew the key.
Why bother turning off the SSID broadcasting? That wouldn't help on security since one can still retrieve your SSID]
by monitoring your probe request or association related frames.
-
marclee
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:34 am
-
Contact:
#10
Post
by marclee » Sat Feb 19, 2005 1:15 pm
I didn't see this mentioned (apologies if it was and I just overlooked it), but how are you calling wpa_supplicant ? From a /etc/init.d script?
I was having trouble with getting it to associate (using TKIP PSK) with my wireless router until I realized that I should be calling wpa_supplicant with a "-Dipw" switch.
I'm using gentoo and there is an extra config file (in addition to /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf) you need to customize at the following path... /etc/conf.d/wpa_supplicant
Hope this helps.
marc
PS - I'm using a T42 23739VA
-
-
T42/3 compatibility and many more
Replies: 6
Hello (helpful) people!
I have an IBM Thinkpad T42 that I want to upgrade it to the absolute max (i know it's not worth it) but still. I read that...
- 6 Replies
- 1310 Views
-
Last post by kfzhu1229
Mon Mar 06, 2017 6:08 pm
-
-
- 0 Replies
- 963 Views
-
Last post by AVN6293
Wed Feb 22, 2017 5:31 pm
-
-
- 3 Replies
- 769 Views
-
Last post by shawross
Tue Apr 11, 2017 5:33 am
-
-
- 23 Replies
- 1302 Views
-
Last post by Thinkpad4by3
Tue May 02, 2017 8:18 am
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests