Processor speed
Processor speed
Hi there,
I'm planning to buy either a X61 (2.2 GHz) or X61s (1.8), however I'm still hesitating which one is right for me.
The reason: I currently have a 4 year old FSC Amilo A (1.6GHz, 266MHz fsb, 256KB level2 cache). I have problems with it when running software like Corel Draw or drunning multiple tasks. Even after upgrading from 256 to 768 mb RAM, it sometimes 'stalls', becomes very work-intensive, and needs a few minutes untill being usable again, so I think it's the cpu causing it...
I don't know whether the X61s (1.8) will be much better since the cpu speed only increases by about 0.2 GHz - or are other factors like fsb & cache also important in this regard? The fact that it's a dual core won't help as hardly any software supports dual core technology, or will it?
I would like to go for the 61s (1.8) for battery life reasons, but need a computer that is capable of performing tasks like photo-editing, etc without giving me a hard time.
Thanks for any help!
Chris
I'm planning to buy either a X61 (2.2 GHz) or X61s (1.8), however I'm still hesitating which one is right for me.
The reason: I currently have a 4 year old FSC Amilo A (1.6GHz, 266MHz fsb, 256KB level2 cache). I have problems with it when running software like Corel Draw or drunning multiple tasks. Even after upgrading from 256 to 768 mb RAM, it sometimes 'stalls', becomes very work-intensive, and needs a few minutes untill being usable again, so I think it's the cpu causing it...
I don't know whether the X61s (1.8) will be much better since the cpu speed only increases by about 0.2 GHz - or are other factors like fsb & cache also important in this regard? The fact that it's a dual core won't help as hardly any software supports dual core technology, or will it?
I would like to go for the 61s (1.8) for battery life reasons, but need a computer that is capable of performing tasks like photo-editing, etc without giving me a hard time.
Thanks for any help!
Chris
Last edited by GeoChris on Sat Nov 17, 2007 2:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
ryengineer
- Moderator Emeritus

- Posts: 4393
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 9:29 pm
- Location: L.A. (home town) CA, Toronto ON.
Thinkpad X61s uses LV (Low Voltage) processor as opposed to the traditional mobile chipset used in X61 counterpart, handling CAD tools can be too much for the former.
"I've come a long, long way," she said, "and I will go as far,
With the man who takes me from my horse, and leads me to a bar."
The man who took her off her steed, and stood her to a beer,
Were a bleary-eyed Surveyor and a DRUNKEN ENGINEER.
With the man who takes me from my horse, and leads me to a bar."
The man who took her off her steed, and stood her to a beer,
Were a bleary-eyed Surveyor and a DRUNKEN ENGINEER.
-
watchtower7
- Freshman Member
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 2:41 pm
- Location: el cajon, ca
I don't think its your processor, more likely you puny ram (768 please).
I have the x61s and photoshop, avid, adobe master collection and it runs no problem.
Make sure you have 2gb ram for xp or 4gb for vista.
My processor benchmarked 50-100% faster than my old Pentium M which also ran everything with no problems.
I have the x61s and photoshop, avid, adobe master collection and it runs no problem.
Make sure you have 2gb ram for xp or 4gb for vista.
My processor benchmarked 50-100% faster than my old Pentium M which also ran everything with no problems.
Agree with the previous comment that the limited amount of RAM may be one culprit here.
Also, processor speed can be somewhat of a misleading index. Your 4-year old 1.6 Ghz CPU (Pentium 4?) compares in no way to any recent, even slower-clocked CPU.
My X60 with 1.83 Ghz Core duo is just way faster at number-crunching tasks than say, my Pentium 4 desktop (3 Ghz) was. This because of huge architecture improvements, faster FSB, newer instructions sets, and a bunch of other things I have no idea about.
Even between Core Duo and Core 2 Duo, improvements seem to be in the ~10% for similarly clocked machines.
So you really can't be wrong going with the 1.8 Ghz X61s. It will for sure be MUCH faster than your current machine, especially coupled with a decent hard drive and enough RAM as previously pointed out.
Also, processor speed can be somewhat of a misleading index. Your 4-year old 1.6 Ghz CPU (Pentium 4?) compares in no way to any recent, even slower-clocked CPU.
My X60 with 1.83 Ghz Core duo is just way faster at number-crunching tasks than say, my Pentium 4 desktop (3 Ghz) was. This because of huge architecture improvements, faster FSB, newer instructions sets, and a bunch of other things I have no idea about.
Even between Core Duo and Core 2 Duo, improvements seem to be in the ~10% for similarly clocked machines.
So you really can't be wrong going with the 1.8 Ghz X61s. It will for sure be MUCH faster than your current machine, especially coupled with a decent hard drive and enough RAM as previously pointed out.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
WTB: Thinkpad with good processor , ssd and 32+GB RAM
by Farro » Thu Jan 19, 2017 9:11 am » in Marketplace - Forum Members only - 4 Replies
- 440 Views
-
Last post by Farro
Mon Jan 23, 2017 11:55 am
-
-
-
Processor Upgrade
by MikalE » Fri Feb 10, 2017 9:07 am » in ThinkPad T400/410/420 and T500/510/520 Series - 7 Replies
- 1105 Views
-
Last post by Tasurinchi
Sat Feb 11, 2017 7:47 am
-
-
-
Modded Bios and Processor Fast Strings.
by Digitalhorizons » Tue Feb 28, 2017 8:46 am » in ThinkPad X200/201/220 and X300/301 Series - 7 Replies
- 1174 Views
-
Last post by Digitalhorizons
Fri Mar 03, 2017 6:36 pm
-
-
-
ThinkCentre M82 Processor upgrade to 7th Gen
by ThinkPad560X » Sun Mar 19, 2017 7:25 pm » in IBM or Lenovo Desktops/Workstations/ThinkStations only - 2 Replies
- 310 Views
-
Last post by axur-delmeria
Mon Mar 20, 2017 2:31 am
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests



