9 Watts of power, measured with Notebook Hardware Control when in battery mode.Nicola wrote:What is 9W?
Change your old memory, batterylife benefits! (56k warning)
Re: Change your old memory, batterylife benefits! (56k warni
Apparently my B1 revision Dothan wasn't as good undervolter as gunston's or aaa's. What revision do you have, you can use CPUz to check it. Here are my tests Banias vs. Dothan.
Banias 1.5GHz 1MB 130nm B1

Dothan 1.6GHz 2MB 90nm B1

1. In idle difference is about 0,25W for Banias.
2. Near idle, the difference gets smaller.
3. In stress it turns to favor Dothan.
- Because Banias is about 10% slower at same speeds, theoretically it consumes more power also near idle, if the task given is something like superpi which can be processed faster.
- Clearly my Banias was great undervolter sample and Dothan not so great sample, although it gets 0,7V in 6x.
Banias 1.5GHz 1MB 130nm B1

Dothan 1.6GHz 2MB 90nm B1

1. In idle difference is about 0,25W for Banias.
2. Near idle, the difference gets smaller.
3. In stress it turns to favor Dothan.
- Because Banias is about 10% slower at same speeds, theoretically it consumes more power also near idle, if the task given is something like superpi which can be processed faster.
- Clearly my Banias was great undervolter sample and Dothan not so great sample, although it gets 0,7V in 6x.
Last edited by jiopsi on Fri Nov 30, 2007 5:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I don't think it'll matter; the reason the C0 doesn't work is because it's not supported in BIOS, but it is as you can see still usable.jiopsi wrote:Ok, so no problems there. Maybe I will try change newer revision, if I can find it couple of dollars. Do you know if LV Dothans like 758 are supported in BIOS?
I also think it won't necessarily be "better", as only the soldered ULV models really push the limits. In fact, the 758 is probably soldered as well. If you can find one on the cheap, go ahead, but don't go out of your way for it.
Do you get somekind of error messages or how do you know it's not supported in BIOS? Just found un-soldered 758 C0 about 10€, so if I can win that on ebay I will be testing that.
All in all, I think normal, LV and ULV models are all the same, just cherrypicked and named in factory.
EDIT: found that 855PM chipset doesn't support LV or ULV according to Intel http://compare.intel.com/pcc/showchart. ... ture=en-US
All in all, I think normal, LV and ULV models are all the same, just cherrypicked and named in factory.
EDIT: found that 855PM chipset doesn't support LV or ULV according to Intel http://compare.intel.com/pcc/showchart. ... ture=en-US
It boots up stuck at 600mhz.jiopsi wrote:Do you get somekind of error messages or how do you know it's not supported in BIOS?
That sounds silly. LV was around before the 915.EDIT: found that 855PM chipset doesn't support LV or ULV according to Intel http://compare.intel.com/pcc/showchart. ... ture=en-US
Yeah, I though that also, so maybe I will give the 758 a try.aaa wrote:That sounds silly. LV was around before the 915.EDIT: found that 855PM chipset doesn't support LV or ULV according to Intel http://compare.intel.com/pcc/showchart. ... ture=en-US
Found some newer 256MB memory and tested it, memory usage was 209MB with both, and I don't know if it matters in how many % it is from whole capacity. I will be testing even newer memory which should consume about same with 512MB if the specs are comparable.

With 512MB Mosel -02

With 256MB Hynix -04

- 0.4W in idle is about right
- It grows to ~0.95W in SuperPI
- About same in Ram stress test
- So, specs are quite comparable, and seems that only IID0 and Standby matters
- Again, don't know if % of used memory matters, but I will be testing with even newer 512MB memory (with about same specs), so we will see if it matters.

With 512MB Mosel -02

With 256MB Hynix -04

- 0.4W in idle is about right
- It grows to ~0.95W in SuperPI
- About same in Ram stress test
- So, specs are quite comparable, and seems that only IID0 and Standby matters
- Again, don't know if % of used memory matters, but I will be testing with even newer 512MB memory (with about same specs), so we will see if it matters.
I ask excuse you. I do not speak English and I have read this fastly post; I have decided the same to write this, I hope is "useful".
Banias
normal 1,39 V
minimal frequency 0,96 V
Dothan
normal 1,340 V
minimal frequency 0,988 V
If the cpu always work to the minimal speed then Banias consumes little.
If they always work to the maximum speed then Dothan consumes little.
If it is set up normal, depends on the work load. Obviously if the higher voltage works much consumes little Dothan using. If it works little it consumes little Banias.
Banias
normal 1,39 V
minimal frequency 0,96 V
Dothan
normal 1,340 V
minimal frequency 0,988 V
If the cpu always work to the minimal speed then Banias consumes little.
If they always work to the maximum speed then Dothan consumes little.
If it is set up normal, depends on the work load. Obviously if the higher voltage works much consumes little Dothan using. If it works little it consumes little Banias.
Some ram tests. I'm not getting very good results
.
So apparently it isn't as simple as "old" vs "new". Perhaps the Mosel stuff was particularly awful? In any case I'll try to get that same Hynix 512 and see.
And it appears the amount of ram (sticks or MB) doesn't matter much for some reason. I presume it's because most of it on standby or something.
Code: Select all
8.9w "Old" Hynix 256MB (8 chip)
8.9w "Old" Elpida 512MB (16 chip)
9.0w "Old" Kingston/Promos 512MB (16 chip)
9.1w "Old" 2x512 (elpida + kingston)
9.0w "New" Crucial/Micron-335 512MB (8 chip)
9.1w "New" Crucial/Micron-335 2x512
9.1w "New" Crucial/Micron-335 1x1gb (16 chip)
9.1w "Old" Kingston/Promos 1x1gb (16 chip)And it appears the amount of ram (sticks or MB) doesn't matter much for some reason. I presume it's because most of it on standby or something.
Yeah, it definitely isn't easy as how old it is, because manufacturing process may have been same like years. Mosel was 140nm and never are definitely smaller, it would be nice if manufacturers would reveal this information. The specs seems quite combarable though, so it would be good to make decisions based from that.
Did you use NHC to check those wattages, if so remember to use about same battery % level in tests, as voltage drops when battery gets empty. Did you test in stress?
Did you use NHC to check those wattages, if so remember to use about same battery % level in tests, as voltage drops when battery gets empty. Did you test in stress?
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
Dire warning for FRUIT, to finally start making HMMs
by RealBlackStuff » Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:46 am » in Off-Topic Stuff - 11 Replies
- 1264 Views
-
Last post by Thinkpad4by3
Wed May 24, 2017 8:14 am
-
-
-
Leaked xx80 series Thinkpads????? (LARGE!! and many pictures warning!)
by Thinkpad4by3 » Wed Apr 05, 2017 7:49 pm » in Pictures of your ThinkPad & desk setup - 8 Replies
- 752 Views
-
Last post by exTPfan
Sat Apr 08, 2017 5:07 am
-
-
-
change cmos battery x41
by D L Davis » Sun Jan 15, 2017 12:23 am » in ThinkPad X2/X3/X4x Series incl. X41 Tablet - 1 Replies
- 364 Views
-
Last post by RealBlackStuff
Sun Jan 15, 2017 6:31 am
-
-
-
IBM ultranav usb keyboard with numpad SK-8835, change to ISO?
by Ole » Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:35 am » in GENERAL ThinkPad News/Comments & Questions - 5 Replies
- 763 Views
-
Last post by micrex22
Thu Apr 06, 2017 9:42 am
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests




