nVidia Quadro NV 140M 128 MB vs ATI X1400 128 MB

Message

madcow · #1 Post by **madcow** » Thu Nov 29, 2007 12:02 pm

Which one performs better on games?

http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVidia-Qua ... 216.0.html

madcow · #2 Post by **madcow** » Fri Nov 30, 2007 9:58 pm

Looks like X1400 performs a little better than the Quadro NVS 140M

#3 Post by **ryengineer** » Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:01 pm

If Windows Vista scores matter to you then ATI X1400 gets more than Quadro NVS 140M (128MB).

madcow · #4 Post by **madcow** » Fri Dec 07, 2007 10:52 am

I finally got my hands on both cards.

The x1400 plays Crysis very well at 800x600 with everything set to low. The quadro 14m is painfully slow at the same setting. For those, who wants to play game, maybe the x1400 is a better choice.

madcow · #5 Post by **madcow** » Sun Dec 09, 2007 6:24 pm

I tested the Quadro 140m on Quake 4 and it seems to play quake 4 better than the X1400. I also tried it on call of duty, and it seems to play a little better than X1400. I guess it 140m just doesn't do well with Crysis.

eghck · #6 Post by **eghck** » Mon Dec 10, 2007 12:25 am

the NV140 is more powerful, but it wasn't made for games. There are 3rd party drivers which help it run games, and when they work its better than the x1400.

madcow · #7 Post by **madcow** » Tue Dec 11, 2007 12:30 am

You are right. I used a tweaked driver and it performs way better than the X1400 on Quake, FEAR, TimeShift, Halo 2, except it doesn't perform on Crysis as well as the X1400.

nVidia Quadro NV 140M 128 MB vs ATI X1400 128 MB

nVidia Quadro NV 140M 128 MB vs ATI X1400 128 MB

Who is online