Difference between X60 and X60s

X60/X61 series specific matters only.
Post Reply
Message
Author
rscosworth
Sophomore Member
Posts: 141
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 12:35 pm
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Difference between X60 and X60s

#1 Post by rscosworth » Mon Feb 11, 2008 5:13 pm

Guys,

Ive just purchased an x60s and while looking around ive realised i have no idea what the difference between the x60 and x60s.

Can someone enlighten me?
-------------------------
7665-B68, T7100 1.8Ghz, 2GB 5300, 100GB 7200rpm, 1440x990, Nvidia 140, Ultimate x32 (x64 dont like my network printer!!)

EOMtp
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1583
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 12:51 pm

#2 Post by EOMtp » Mon Feb 11, 2008 5:48 pm

1. Low voltage processor, i.e., cooler-running and longer battery life.
2. Takes slim battery as well as the other two: 4-cell and 8-cell cylindrical.
3. Has a smaller and extremely quiet fan, which runs only 10% of the time, if that.
You have the "right" machine. Enjoy!

gunston
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1306
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 8:00 am
Location: Brisbane, QLD AUST
Contact:

#3 Post by gunston » Mon Feb 11, 2008 6:10 pm

X60s, not ready for Vista compare to X61s.
1. T43 2668-B97 14" SXGA+ 1.5G RAM 9cells
2. X60s 1703-CA3 powerful

novasource
Posts: 47
Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2007 8:29 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

#4 Post by novasource » Mon Feb 11, 2008 6:22 pm

gunston wrote:X60s, not ready for Vista compare to X61s.
That's funny, I run Vista just fine on my X60 (not s).

gunston
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1306
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 8:00 am
Location: Brisbane, QLD AUST
Contact:

#5 Post by gunston » Mon Feb 11, 2008 6:37 pm

novasource,

X60 is more than enough to run,
X60s would get little sluggish to run Vista, best performance with XP
1. T43 2668-B97 14" SXGA+ 1.5G RAM 9cells
2. X60s 1703-CA3 powerful

ThinkPad
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1085
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 7:33 pm
Location: Windy City

#6 Post by ThinkPad » Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:26 pm

I feel the 's' model is rather slow at 1.8ghz, even compared to my X41. But battery life is definitely adequate.
Thinkpad X-41 Tablet 1869 CSU- 1.6GHz
Thinkpad T-42P 2373 GUU-2.1 GHz; 2 GB RAM; Mini-dock
::Sierra AirCard WWAN 875::NMB Thai::
RIP-Thinkpad T41 2379 DJU

gunston
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1306
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 8:00 am
Location: Brisbane, QLD AUST
Contact:

#7 Post by gunston » Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:29 pm

ThinkPad wrote:I feel the 's' model is rather slow at 1.8ghz, even compared to my X41. But battery life is definitely adequate.
's' model would absolutely surpass X41.
1. T43 2668-B97 14" SXGA+ 1.5G RAM 9cells
2. X60s 1703-CA3 powerful

ThinkPad
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1085
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 7:33 pm
Location: Windy City

#8 Post by ThinkPad » Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:31 pm

gunston wrote:
ThinkPad wrote:I feel the 's' model is rather slow at 1.8ghz, even compared to my X41. But battery life is definitely adequate.
's' model would absolutely surpass X41.
I feel its vista thats slowing down the x61s I have used or could be the 1 gig ram...
Thinkpad X-41 Tablet 1869 CSU- 1.6GHz
Thinkpad T-42P 2373 GUU-2.1 GHz; 2 GB RAM; Mini-dock
::Sierra AirCard WWAN 875::NMB Thai::
RIP-Thinkpad T41 2379 DJU

efrant
Sophomore Member
Posts: 198
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 1:06 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada

#9 Post by efrant » Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:58 pm

gunston wrote:X60s, not ready for Vista compare to X61s.
Vista works just fine on my x60s...
T60p: T7400, 4GB, 15" UXGA Flexview, V5200, Seagate XT 500GB 7200rpm hybrid, DVD-RW, Atheros AGN, BT, Win7 Ultimate x64
X200s: SL9400, 4GB, WXGA+ LED, 160GB Intel X25-M G2, WiMax/WiFi Link 5350, MC8781 WWAN, BT, Win7 Ultimate x64

gunston
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1306
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 8:00 am
Location: Brisbane, QLD AUST
Contact:

#10 Post by gunston » Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:54 pm

Thinkpad,
It could be the insufficient ram to support Vista, min requirement stated that it needs 2Gb ram to run smoothly.

efrant,
Well, X60s is running fine with Vista to certain extend. It still slower than the X61s which equipped with Santa Rosa platform (20% more heat generated).
1. T43 2668-B97 14" SXGA+ 1.5G RAM 9cells
2. X60s 1703-CA3 powerful

ThinkPad
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1085
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 7:33 pm
Location: Windy City

#11 Post by ThinkPad » Tue Feb 12, 2008 6:21 am

gunston wrote:Thinkpad,
It could be the insufficient ram to support Vista, min requirement stated that it needs 2Gb ram to run smoothly.

.
That makes sense. My sister uses an X61s with vista, and I think it should be a requirement to have 2 gigs from the factory when ordering vista.
Thinkpad X-41 Tablet 1869 CSU- 1.6GHz
Thinkpad T-42P 2373 GUU-2.1 GHz; 2 GB RAM; Mini-dock
::Sierra AirCard WWAN 875::NMB Thai::
RIP-Thinkpad T41 2379 DJU

gunston
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1306
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 8:00 am
Location: Brisbane, QLD AUST
Contact:

#12 Post by gunston » Tue Feb 12, 2008 7:21 am

Thinkpad,

Add in another slot of 2Gb RAM, would be a "plus" :)
1. T43 2668-B97 14" SXGA+ 1.5G RAM 9cells
2. X60s 1703-CA3 powerful

pianowizard
Senior ThinkPadder
Senior ThinkPadder
Posts: 8368
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:07 am
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Contact:

#13 Post by pianowizard » Tue Feb 12, 2008 8:00 am

The X61 tablet I had until last month had only 1GB of RAM and it ran Vista very slowly. It felt as slow as running XP on an X20 with 128MB RAM.
Microsoft Surface 3 (Atom x7-Z8700 / 4GB / 128GB / LTE)
Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF (Core i3-3220 / 8GB / 8TB); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770 / 16GB / 9.25TB)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell 3008WFP, U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP

andreas74
Posts: 27
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:59 am
Location: Switzerland

#14 Post by andreas74 » Tue Feb 12, 2008 9:07 am

to have your x60s really work at max speed , at all times, make sure you deactivate the cpu- power-saving thing. ('global power options' or similar in power manager).
If its set to on (which it is by default), also the 'full speed' setting slows down at times, also under very high cpu load.
X60s / T40p / A20m (retired)

SHoTTa35
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1597
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 6:20 pm
Location: Wash, DC
Contact:

#15 Post by SHoTTa35 » Tue Feb 12, 2008 11:12 am

high performance is what you mean in the Vista power options menu but that does suck the battery life down more. If you want a a powerful system then they probably wouldn't get the S version or a lower speed CPU. The low voltage CPUs are designed to save power over speed.

Speed isn't much of a factor when you are typing word docs or browsing emails (opening the applications tho would be faster with more speed). You get the idea ... I have a Core Duo 2Ghz and sometimes i wonder if the 1.6 would save me more heat and then battery life :) Even tho i got 3hrs 43mins on this system before with a 6 Cell. :D
Current - Thinkpad T410si - Core i3 330m, 4GB, 250GB 5400RPM, WXGA+, FPR, BT, Camera, DVDRW, Gobi2000, Win7 Pro x32
Past - Thinkpad T410 - T400 - T61 - T60 - T43 - T42 - T41 - T40 - T23 - 600X

rscosworth
Sophomore Member
Posts: 141
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 12:35 pm
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

#16 Post by rscosworth » Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:28 pm

whats your opinions on a 1702-D8G?
-------------------------
7665-B68, T7100 1.8Ghz, 2GB 5300, 100GB 7200rpm, 1440x990, Nvidia 140, Ultimate x32 (x64 dont like my network printer!!)

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Thinkpad X6x Series incl. X6x Tablet”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests