Does my L7300@1.4Ghz CPU run at 1.6Ghz? (pics)

Message

TJMacGyver · #1 Post by **TJMacGyver** » Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:06 pm

I just downloaded the CPU-Z app to test whether or not my computer would be able to run OSX.
And when I started the program I noticed that it was, supposedly, running at 1.6Ghz
And the weird thing is that the power settings where at "Maximum Battery life"

And when I change to "Maximum perfomance" it goes down to 1.4Ghz

Is the CPU realy running at 1.6Ghz?

SHoTTa35 · #2 Post by **SHoTTa35** » Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:09 pm

your program is just not updated to match multipliers or something. Do you have the latest version?

TJMacGyver · #3 Post by **TJMacGyver** » Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:26 pm

yeah, just got it from the site: http://cpuid.com/cpuz.php

under "download the latest version"

aaa · #4 Post by **aaa** » Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:49 pm

It's still out of date. It's not recognizing the lower FSB, the speed is supposed to be 800 iirc, 8x100.

Interesting possibilities come to mind though. Looks like the multiplier's not locked as tightly as it once was, so it may be possible to actually get 8x200 (not the case here of course).

jketzetera · #5 Post by **jketzetera** » Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:53 pm

TJMacGyver wrote:yeah, just got it from the site: http://cpuid.com/cpuz.php

under "download the latest version"

The Intel Processor Frequency ID Utility is likely to be able to tell you what is happening with your CPU.

http://www.intel.com/support/processors ... equencyid/

TJMacGyver · #6 Post by **TJMacGyver** » Thu Apr 10, 2008 5:03 pm

Yeah it must be the FSB that it is not registering.

but the software is quite new, it's from 03/29/2008

The intel software however is quite old, from 2004

it's no use on vista.

awolfe63 · #7 Post by **awolfe63** » Thu Apr 10, 2008 5:14 pm

The only SW I can find that gets this right on Santa Rosa chips is the Intel Thermal Analysis Tool. MOBmeter also gets it right in certain modes.

XIII · #8 Post by **XIII** » Thu Apr 10, 2008 8:08 pm

It is just Dynamic Overclocking of one core when the other core is not used.
It is a new feature of Santa Rosa platform, nothing to worry about.

awolfe63 · #9 Post by **awolfe63** » Thu Apr 10, 2008 8:40 pm

XIII wrote:It is just Dynamic Overclocking of one core when the other core is not used.
It is a new feature of Santa Rosa platform, nothing to worry about.

No it's not. 1.8 and 2GHz CPUs also report 1.6GHz with CPUID in battery mode. It is an error. These chips drop down to 8x multiplier and 100MHz bus (quad pumped). Most frequency tools miss the bus speed drop.

blackomegax · #10 Post by **blackomegax** » Thu Apr 10, 2008 11:57 pm

the newest RMclock reports correctly on FSB changes.

XIII · #11 Post by **XIII** » Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:47 pm

awolfe63 wrote:
XIII wrote:It is just Dynamic Overclocking of one core when the other core is not used.
It is a new feature of Santa Rosa platform, nothing to worry about.
No it's not. 1.8 and 2GHz CPUs also report 1.6GHz with CPUID in battery mode. It is an error. These chips drop down to 8x multiplier and 100MHz bus (quad pumped). Most frequency tools miss the bus speed drop.

Actually, you are wrong. Santa Rosa platform only drops to 400MHz FSB in SuperLFM mode (aka C4 enhanced State). Normal Power Manager like Windows and Lenovo do support this state but they don't let this state last long when you starts using your machine. If you want to keep the CPU at this state, you need a real clock manager like RMClock.

Does my L7300@1.4Ghz CPU run at 1.6Ghz? (pics)

Does my L7300@1.4Ghz CPU run at 1.6Ghz? (pics)

Who is online