Lenovo no longer offering 4:3 size LCD?
Are the laptops Lenovo selling 16:10 or 16:9? They were 16:10 a while ago, but here is what their website says when you click on "help me decide"
"Widescreen refers to a computer screen that has a 16:9 aspect ratio as opposed to 4:3 aspect ratio. The wider aspect ratio allows for more content to be displayed on the screen at one time, ideal for watching DVD movies or working on large spreadsheets. "
16:10 may just be useable for serious work, but 16:9 isn't. Incidentally, most of what Lenovo say is a lie, for example, that "the wider aspect ratio allows for more content to be displayed on the screen at one time" A 14.1 diagonal screen has an area of 95.4 (4:3), 89.4 (16:10), or 84.9 (16:9).
Fortunately, I have one 14.1in SXGA+ that I'm using plus three that I've mothballed (two T42s and a T61).
"Widescreen refers to a computer screen that has a 16:9 aspect ratio as opposed to 4:3 aspect ratio. The wider aspect ratio allows for more content to be displayed on the screen at one time, ideal for watching DVD movies or working on large spreadsheets. "
16:10 may just be useable for serious work, but 16:9 isn't. Incidentally, most of what Lenovo say is a lie, for example, that "the wider aspect ratio allows for more content to be displayed on the screen at one time" A 14.1 diagonal screen has an area of 95.4 (4:3), 89.4 (16:10), or 84.9 (16:9).
Fortunately, I have one 14.1in SXGA+ that I'm using plus three that I've mothballed (two T42s and a T61).
-
pianowizard
- Senior ThinkPadder

- Posts: 8368
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:07 am
- Location: Ann Arbor, MI
- Contact:
No, they are comparing XGA with WXGA, SXGA+ with WSXGA+, UXGA with WUXGA, etc. In other words, in terms of the number of pixels, not surface area.exTPfan wrote:most of what Lenovo say is a lie, for example, that "the wider aspect ratio allows for more content to be displayed on the screen at one time" A 14.1 diagonal screen has an area of 95.4 (4:3), 89.4 (16:10), or 84.9 (16:9).
Microsoft Surface 3 (Atom x7-Z8700 / 4GB / 128GB / LTE)
Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF (Core i3-3220 / 8GB / 8TB); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770 / 16GB / 9.25TB)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell 3008WFP, U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP
Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF (Core i3-3220 / 8GB / 8TB); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770 / 16GB / 9.25TB)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell 3008WFP, U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP
Wrong! This is the "help me decide" for TPs with a 14.1 inch screen.pianowizard wrote:No, they are comparing XGA with WXGA, SXGA+ with WSXGA+, UXGA with WUXGA, etc. In other words, in terms of the number of pixels, not surface area.exTPfan wrote:most of what Lenovo say is a lie, for example, that "the wider aspect ratio allows for more content to be displayed on the screen at one time" A 14.1 diagonal screen has an area of 95.4 (4:3), 89.4 (16:10), or 84.9 (16:9).
-
pianowizard
- Senior ThinkPadder

- Posts: 8368
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:07 am
- Location: Ann Arbor, MI
- Contact:
A 14.1" WXGA screen gives more real estate than a 14.1" XGA screen, even though the former has a smaller surface area.exTPfan wrote:Wrong! This is the "help me decide" for TPs with a 14.1 inch screen.
Microsoft Surface 3 (Atom x7-Z8700 / 4GB / 128GB / LTE)
Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF (Core i3-3220 / 8GB / 8TB); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770 / 16GB / 9.25TB)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell 3008WFP, U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP
Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF (Core i3-3220 / 8GB / 8TB); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770 / 16GB / 9.25TB)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell 3008WFP, U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP
Read the full quote:
"Widescreen refers to a computer screen that has a 16:9 aspect ratio as opposed to 4:3 aspect ratio. The wider aspect ratio allows for more content to be displayed on the screen at one time, ... "
It's clear what it's saying, and it's clear that it's wrong. Hard to believe they can't count at Lenovo, so it must be intentional, i.e., a lie.
"Widescreen refers to a computer screen that has a 16:9 aspect ratio as opposed to 4:3 aspect ratio. The wider aspect ratio allows for more content to be displayed on the screen at one time, ... "
It's clear what it's saying, and it's clear that it's wrong. Hard to believe they can't count at Lenovo, so it must be intentional, i.e., a lie.
The confusion is the pixel density. While a 14.1" XGA will have more surface area than a 14.1" WXGA display, the number of pixels will be greater in the WXGA display.
For instance, a 14.1" XGA display shows the same amount of information as a 15" XGA display, although the 15" display has more surface area than the 14.1" display. The number of pixels is the same in the 14.1" and 15" XGA displays.
An XGA display of any size has 790,000 pixels. A WXGA display of any size has 1,040,000 pixels.
While you will be able to see more information on a 14.1 " WXGA display as opposed to a 14.1" XGA display, the fonts and images will be smaller on the 14.1" WXGA display.
For instance, a 14.1" XGA display shows the same amount of information as a 15" XGA display, although the 15" display has more surface area than the 14.1" display. The number of pixels is the same in the 14.1" and 15" XGA displays.
An XGA display of any size has 790,000 pixels. A WXGA display of any size has 1,040,000 pixels.
While you will be able to see more information on a 14.1 " WXGA display as opposed to a 14.1" XGA display, the fonts and images will be smaller on the 14.1" WXGA display.
DKB
There's no confusion: what Lenovo says is perfectly clear, and perfectly false.
However, if you want to argue that Lenovo meant to say "The wider aspect ratio allows for more pixels to be displayed..." (but didn't), it's still false.
The highest resolution I can find on the current 14.1in wide screens is WXGA+=1440x900=1296000.
On the 4:3 14.1 screens, they used to offer SXGA+=1400x1050=1470000.
I can understand that Lenovo would want to fudge this.
However, if you want to argue that Lenovo meant to say "The wider aspect ratio allows for more pixels to be displayed..." (but didn't), it's still false.
The highest resolution I can find on the current 14.1in wide screens is WXGA+=1440x900=1296000.
On the 4:3 14.1 screens, they used to offer SXGA+=1400x1050=1470000.
I can understand that Lenovo would want to fudge this.
Considering that they used to offer 14.1" SXGA+ displays (this is what I have on my T42), and now the best they offer is 14.1" WXGA+, I can see where you are coming from.
In this light you are correct. Lenovo's current 14.1", WXGA+, 16:9 aspect ratio (1440x900) Widescreen, T-series Thinkpads are not allowing for 'more content to be displayed on the screen' than what could be displayed on the previous 14.1", SXGA+, 4:3 aspect ratio (1400x1050), T-series ThinkPads.
Hey, I don't like the Widescreens either.
In this light you are correct. Lenovo's current 14.1", WXGA+, 16:9 aspect ratio (1440x900) Widescreen, T-series Thinkpads are not allowing for 'more content to be displayed on the screen' than what could be displayed on the previous 14.1", SXGA+, 4:3 aspect ratio (1400x1050), T-series ThinkPads.
Hey, I don't like the Widescreens either.
DKB
-
bobdsmith
- Freshman Member
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 5:04 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Contact:
X series here:
Why does a subnotebook need to be extended a few pointless inches for a widescreen. I see no reason why there cant be a widescreen model (read: X300) but 1024x768 is god on the sub notebook. WHY?!?! (Crys while hugging X61s's display)
I think the only ting we can do is go on lenovo blogs and spam that we want 4:3s and try not to buy widescreen TPs unless we can't help it (IE: need one for work, current toy dies)
EBay and outlet ftw.
Why does a subnotebook need to be extended a few pointless inches for a widescreen. I see no reason why there cant be a widescreen model (read: X300) but 1024x768 is god on the sub notebook. WHY?!?! (Crys while hugging X61s's display)
I think the only ting we can do is go on lenovo blogs and spam that we want 4:3s and try not to buy widescreen TPs unless we can't help it (IE: need one for work, current toy dies)
EBay and outlet ftw.
Anyone working with text is going to miss the 4:3 display. You can see more of a "printed" normal-looking page than with a widescreen. I'm glad I got one last year, on my T60.
But try and find a desktop LCD in that ratio. I wanted a 20" 1400x1050 desktop monitor to match my T60's highest resolution, and there were three models available, then two, and now none.
But try and find a desktop LCD in that ratio. I wanted a 20" 1400x1050 desktop monitor to match my T60's highest resolution, and there were three models available, then two, and now none.
This is true.JML wrote:Anyone working with text is going to miss the 4:3 display. You can see more of a "printed" normal-looking page than with a widescreen. I'm glad I got one last year, on my T60.
Here, I can happily say that I bought one of the last 20 inch 4:3 monitors. It is wide enough.JML wrote:But try and find a desktop LCD in that ratio. I wanted a 20" 1400x1050 desktop monitor to match my T60's highest resolution, and there were three models available, then two, and now none.
T41 and T410
"Come on in and buy the new squat screen. Squatter is better !"
"Come on in and buy the new squat screen. Squatter is better !"
-
bill bolton
- Admin

- Posts: 3848
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 10:09 am
- Location: Sydney, Australia - Best Address on Earth!
-
pianowizard
- Senior ThinkPadder

- Posts: 8368
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:07 am
- Location: Ann Arbor, MI
- Contact:
It's true that people who maximize the text document on the screen tend to prefer 4:3. But I like to either view two pages at once, or a text document and another window/document side by side, and both arrangements are usually more easily achieved on widescreens.JML wrote:Anyone working with text is going to miss the 4:3 display.
EDIT: I think this pictorial explanation is easier to understand.
Last edited by pianowizard on Tue Jul 29, 2008 9:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
Microsoft Surface 3 (Atom x7-Z8700 / 4GB / 128GB / LTE)
Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF (Core i3-3220 / 8GB / 8TB); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770 / 16GB / 9.25TB)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell 3008WFP, U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP
Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF (Core i3-3220 / 8GB / 8TB); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770 / 16GB / 9.25TB)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell 3008WFP, U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
SL400 Battery No Longer Charges
by Imperatrix » Tue Mar 07, 2017 4:06 pm » in ThinkPad SL and L Series - 3 Replies
- 1888 Views
-
Last post by Imperatrix
Sun Mar 12, 2017 5:10 pm
-
-
-
[Solved] Yoga 2 Pro Model 20266 with Windows 10. Botched SSD upgrade (screen no longer works)
by prophetic » Wed Mar 29, 2017 12:39 am » in IdeaPad Series Laptops - 2 Replies
- 1276 Views
-
Last post by prophetic
Wed Mar 29, 2017 9:26 am
-
-
- 0 Replies
- 1709 Views
-
Last post by NeoSoul
Mon Mar 06, 2017 2:41 pm
-
-
damaged LCD connector cable, need also new IPS panel
by PRAGUEGUY » Fri Dec 30, 2016 3:36 pm » in ThinkPad X230 and later Series - 7 Replies
- 850 Views
-
Last post by PRAGUEGUY
Thu Jan 12, 2017 10:15 am
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests




