Sorry to be a newb...
Sorry to be a newb...
I was just wanting to upgrade my wi-fi in my T60 DAU 1953. Will this chip work? Is it really going to be worth it? Main reason I want to upgrade is because I want a broader range for picking up signals. Thanks guys,
Link
Danyael
MOD EDIT: Link shortened for better scrolling.
Link
Danyael
MOD EDIT: Link shortened for better scrolling.
Lenovo T60 1953 DAU
WinXP Pro / Server 2003
SATA 60GB
2GB DDRII 667MHz Kingston (UPGRD)
2.0GHz Yonah Core Duo 2MB L2 (UPGRD)
WinXP Pro / Server 2003
SATA 60GB
2GB DDRII 667MHz Kingston (UPGRD)
2.0GHz Yonah Core Duo 2MB L2 (UPGRD)
-
Estrogen Kid
- Freshman Member
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 2:26 am
- Location: Irvine, CA
- Contact:
you won't get any speed increase because the T60 doesn't have a third wifi antenna for wireless N. it also depends on what wifi card you currently have, Atheros wifi tends to drain more power but provide better range whereas Intel wifi saves more power.
T61P 6459CTO - WSXGA+, Core 2 Duo T7500, 2 GB DDR2-667 RAM, 200 GB 7200RPM 7K200 HDD, NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M 256MB, Arctic Silver 5, NMB keyboard
Retired: A31, T22
Retired: A31, T22
Well, Im not really looking for speed though. Im more looking for range. I don't know a whole lot about the internals of the wi-fi chipset for my particular model, but I did swap processors and I still am going to swap lcd panels so I can go higher than 1024 x 768.
But currently, I'm looking for better range with my wireless. Thanks!!
Danyael
But currently, I'm looking for better range with my wireless. Thanks!!
Danyael
Lenovo T60 1953 DAU
WinXP Pro / Server 2003
SATA 60GB
2GB DDRII 667MHz Kingston (UPGRD)
2.0GHz Yonah Core Duo 2MB L2 (UPGRD)
WinXP Pro / Server 2003
SATA 60GB
2GB DDRII 667MHz Kingston (UPGRD)
2.0GHz Yonah Core Duo 2MB L2 (UPGRD)
That I don't know.
Guess its a good thing there are forums like this on. 
Danyael
ps- I have tried external PCiII (or whatever they're called) cards in my expansion slot, didn't work. I didn't get any better range than my built in wi-fi. Now, the weird thing is, I used that same laptop card (with the help of an adapter) in one of my desktop PC's and I was able to see networks with that that I couldn't see with that same card in my laptop. I'm scratching my head on that one.
Danyael
Danyael
ps- I have tried external PCiII (or whatever they're called) cards in my expansion slot, didn't work. I didn't get any better range than my built in wi-fi. Now, the weird thing is, I used that same laptop card (with the help of an adapter) in one of my desktop PC's and I was able to see networks with that that I couldn't see with that same card in my laptop. I'm scratching my head on that one.
Danyael
Lenovo T60 1953 DAU
WinXP Pro / Server 2003
SATA 60GB
2GB DDRII 667MHz Kingston (UPGRD)
2.0GHz Yonah Core Duo 2MB L2 (UPGRD)
WinXP Pro / Server 2003
SATA 60GB
2GB DDRII 667MHz Kingston (UPGRD)
2.0GHz Yonah Core Duo 2MB L2 (UPGRD)
Re: Sorry to be a newb...
This card won't work with your T60, because it is non-lenovo product. T60 will give an 1802 error and ask your to remove the uncertified hardware during boot. Although someone is working on hacking the restriction, but so far there is no satisfying solution.Danyael wrote:I was just wanting to upgrade my wi-fi in my T60 DAU 1953. Will this chip work?
Link
Core 2 Duo T7600, 3GB DDR2-667 RAM, Main 7K320 320GB 7200RPM + Ultrabay 320GB 5400RPM, ATI FireGL V5250, 15" IPS UXGA, DVDRW, Bluetooth, Atheros ABGN, NMB Keyboard, Fingerprint, Win7 Pro X86 + Vista 64-bit SP2, Advanced Dock.
Some T60 latops do have a third wifi antenna for wireless N. For example, my T60 in signature.Estrogen Kid wrote:you won't get any speed increase because the T60 doesn't have a third wifi antenna for wireless N.
Core 2 Duo T7600, 3GB DDR2-667 RAM, Main 7K320 320GB 7200RPM + Ultrabay 320GB 5400RPM, ATI FireGL V5250, 15" IPS UXGA, DVDRW, Bluetooth, Atheros ABGN, NMB Keyboard, Fingerprint, Win7 Pro X86 + Vista 64-bit SP2, Advanced Dock.
-
AvalonXIII
- Senior Member

- Posts: 542
- Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 8:20 pm
- Location: San Jose, CA
What you need is Zender's hack:
http://forum.thinkpads.com/viewtopic.ph ... ck&start=0
Read that thread carefully before proceeding. Although if you're new at this, I wouldn't recommend doing the hack at all, since the BIOS is not to be messed around with.
http://forum.thinkpads.com/viewtopic.ph ... ck&start=0
Read that thread carefully before proceeding. Although if you're new at this, I wouldn't recommend doing the hack at all, since the BIOS is not to be messed around with.
-
hellosailor
- Senior Member

- Posts: 647
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 1:52 pm
- Location: NY, NY
Danyael, the Intel a/b/g/n Wifi is among the least powerful on the market, 25mW or 50mW in power depending on who you get the data from. (Intel gave me data as 25mW.)
By comparison there are USB WiFi adapters and PCMCIA WiFi cards with 600mW of power, more than 4x as much power which of course means 4x more power drain on your battery.
But every WiFi control applet I've ever seen gives the user the choice of setting performance versus battery life. Having a weak WiFi radio simply means you CAN'T get performance from it, even when you can afford to use the power.
The other advantage to an external approach is that many of them will let you use an omnidirectional gian antenna. I don't know th egain of the internal antennas but suspect it isn't great, using an external antenna could again easily double your effective range.
Bottom line? Go external.
By comparison there are USB WiFi adapters and PCMCIA WiFi cards with 600mW of power, more than 4x as much power which of course means 4x more power drain on your battery.
But every WiFi control applet I've ever seen gives the user the choice of setting performance versus battery life. Having a weak WiFi radio simply means you CAN'T get performance from it, even when you can afford to use the power.
The other advantage to an external approach is that many of them will let you use an omnidirectional gian antenna. I don't know th egain of the internal antennas but suspect it isn't great, using an external antenna could again easily double your effective range.
Bottom line? Go external.
Thank you "hellosailor". That was pretty much what I was looking for. I rarely have my laptop on when it cannot be plugged into the wall, so I'm now too concerned about battery drain. I guess now I'll start looking at external wi-fi adapters.
Does anyone have a good external wi-fi adapter that they swear by? Last one I picked out didn't work that great.
Again, I'm more concerned with RANGE vs: speed... although both would be nice, but RANGE is definitely what Im looking for.
Thanks!!!
Danyael
Does anyone have a good external wi-fi adapter that they swear by? Last one I picked out didn't work that great.
Again, I'm more concerned with RANGE vs: speed... although both would be nice, but RANGE is definitely what Im looking for.
Thanks!!!
Danyael
Lenovo T60 1953 DAU
WinXP Pro / Server 2003
SATA 60GB
2GB DDRII 667MHz Kingston (UPGRD)
2.0GHz Yonah Core Duo 2MB L2 (UPGRD)
WinXP Pro / Server 2003
SATA 60GB
2GB DDRII 667MHz Kingston (UPGRD)
2.0GHz Yonah Core Duo 2MB L2 (UPGRD)
-
hellosailor
- Senior Member

- Posts: 647
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 1:52 pm
- Location: NY, NY
Directional antennas always allow for higher gain compared to an omni, but there are high gain omnis as well. The problem with a directional antenna is that you have to start hunting the direction of the source, and then if you move a bit...it's gone. With an omni, you can always velcro it to the laptop cover, and then more or less ignore it. But set up a directional (like a yagi) in the airport...and you may get more attention than you want, in these paranoid times.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests





