California drivers may not send, write or read messages

Talk about "WhatEVER !"..
Message
Author
mattbiernat
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1621
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 12:18 pm
Location: Brooklyn, NY

California drivers may not send, write or read messages

#1 Post by mattbiernat » Thu Sep 25, 2008 8:26 am

California drivers may not send, write or read messages on electronic devices.
http://www.latimes.com/technology/la-me ... 2911.story

my question is how are they going to enforce it? i see two possible answers.
1. not enforce it
2. give everyone a ticket who is holding a cell phone.
option two will be taken by abusive cops. for example i will be typing a number on my cell phone and i will get a ticket for texting by a cop who just wants to meet his ticket quota.

What else are they going to do? Ban using GPS/map quest directions while driving? Ban eating hamburger while driving? Ban scratching my head while driving?

jdhurst
Admin
Admin
Posts: 5831
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 6:49 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

#2 Post by jdhurst » Thu Sep 25, 2008 8:55 am

Whatever we may think, this issue *is* a problem. Cell phones, Blackberries, text messaging devices et al are on the way to being outlawed when driving in Ontario. It may have already happened - I don't precisely know.

I am reasonably in favour of this. I see people careening around 4 lanes of traffic at 120Km/hour gabbing on a phone and *not* watching what they are doing. Dangerous!

Then, there are other times (rush hour) when we are all stopped or going exceedingly slowly. Is it not reasonable then to use a phone?

Natty problem. ... JDH

GomJabbar
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 9765
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 6:57 am

#3 Post by GomJabbar » Thu Sep 25, 2008 8:59 am

I guess that soon there will be "Dragon Naturally Speaking" for cell phones :!:
DKB

Purcy
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 921
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: Pittsburgh PA, USA

#4 Post by Purcy » Thu Sep 25, 2008 10:27 am

jdhurst wrote:Whatever we may think, this issue *is* a problem. Cell phones, Blackberries, text messaging devices et al are on the way to being outlawed when driving in Ontario. It may have already happened - I don't precisely know.

I am reasonably in favour of this. I see people careening around 4 lanes of traffic at 120Km/hour gabbing on a phone and *not* watching what they are doing. Dangerous!

Then, there are other times (rush hour) when we are all stopped or going exceedingly slowly. Is it not reasonable then to use a phone?



I'm not in favor of people doing too much of anything while driving except looking forward with both hands on the wheel. I've seen over the years women putting on full makeup, people with an open newspaper across the steering wheel - looking down reading it, etc. But I agree that the cell phone usage while driving is the most pervasive, and it seems everybody has a cell phone. I personally will answer mine if it rings while driving but immediately put it on speakerphone.

It scares me that a lot of people don't realize the full danger of talking, texting, reading messages - while driving; they are like the drunk person, who feels he/she is still in total control.
IBM T23 (2648-4NU) 1.13Ghz Pentium III, 1GB, 60GB 5400rpm, CD/DVD-RW, Internal Wireless, Windows XP Pro SP2 [DONOR]

no_man
Sophomore Member
Posts: 128
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 11:41 am
Location: Cleveland, Ohio USA

Driving while shaving

#5 Post by no_man » Thu Sep 25, 2008 11:02 am

Whew! Still driving and shaving, each morning... this multi-task
saves me 21 hours per year.

I know, dangers exist, as I was recently rear-ended by a lady tending to her 3 children.

Purcy
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 921
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: Pittsburgh PA, USA

Re: Driving while shaving

#6 Post by Purcy » Thu Sep 25, 2008 12:06 pm

no_man wrote:Whew! Still driving and shaving, each morning... this multi-task
saves me 21 hours per year.

I know, dangers exist, as I was recently rear-ended by a lady tending to her 3 children.
I think shaving is pretty safe, as long as you don't need to look in the mirror to do it.
IBM T23 (2648-4NU) 1.13Ghz Pentium III, 1GB, 60GB 5400rpm, CD/DVD-RW, Internal Wireless, Windows XP Pro SP2 [DONOR]

qviri
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1275
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 5:45 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany

Re: California drivers may not send, write or read messages

#7 Post by qviri » Thu Sep 25, 2008 12:45 pm

mattbiernat wrote:1. not enforce it
2. give everyone a ticket who is holding a cell phone.
3. Ticket those who are driving dangerously while their phone is in their hands.
for example i will be typing a number on my cell phone and i will get a ticket for texting by a cop who just wants to meet his ticket quota.
Voice dial. If you're actually driving (as opposed to crawling during a rush hour), you shouldn't be typing anything on your phone. I came entirely too close to rear-ending people while not paying attention for a moment in the past, and that was without an electronic device to distract me.
X220/IPS, T60p/IPS
Nothing endures but change

Ralf Hutter
Posts: 49
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 3:34 pm
Location: East Arcadia California

Re: California drivers may not send, write or read messages

#8 Post by Ralf Hutter » Thu Sep 25, 2008 4:24 pm

mattbiernat wrote:California drivers may not.....



What else are they going to do? Ban using GPS/map quest directions while driving? Ban eating hamburger while driving? Ban scratching my head while driving?
Welcome to the Peoples Republik of Kalifornia, the most shining example of the "Nanny State". For the privilege of the great climate and scenery, this sort of "feel-good" PC BS is what we have to put up with.

bill bolton
Admin
Admin
Posts: 3848
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 10:09 am
Location: Sydney, Australia - Best Address on Earth!

Re: California drivers may not send, write or read messages

#9 Post by bill bolton » Thu Sep 25, 2008 6:36 pm

Ralf Hutter wrote:this sort of "feel-good" PC BS is what we have to put up with.
Basic public safety is "PC BS"? :shock:

A motor vehicle is a lethal weapon if not given the operators full attention. :banghead:

KristianJ
Moderator1
Moderator1
Posts: 1074
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 5:45 am
Location: Penrith, Australia

Re: California drivers may not send, write or read messages

#10 Post by KristianJ » Thu Sep 25, 2008 7:08 pm

bill bolton wrote: Basic public safety is "PC BS"? :shock:

A motor vehicle is a lethal weapon if not given the operators full attention. :banghead:
Exactly right - if one feels the urgency to respond to their text message tone or send one, pull over and do it. Simple, really...
X220 4291-46M
HP Pavilion dv7-2109tx


rkawakami
Admin
Admin
Posts: 10055
Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2006 1:26 am
Location: San Jose, CA 95120 USA
Contact:

#11 Post by rkawakami » Thu Sep 25, 2008 8:16 pm

Mr. Roadshow at the San Jose Mercury (aka, Murky) News deals with transportation issues, mostly around the South Bay. I'm an occasional contributor to the column but this one wasn't one of mine:

http://www.siliconvalley.com/ci_10530986

Read the fourth "Q" and "A"; it's pretty funny but it illustrates how some people think about cell phones and driving.
Ray Kawakami
X22 X24 X31 X41 X41T X60 X60s X61 X61s X200 X200s X300 X301 Z60m Z61t Z61p 560 560Z 600 600E 600X T21 T22 T23 T41 T60p T410 T420 T520 W500 W520 R50 A21p A22p A31 A31p
NOTE: All links to PC-Doctor software hosted by me are dead. Files removed 8/28/12 by manufacturer's demand.

jdhurst
Admin
Admin
Posts: 5831
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 6:49 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

Re: California drivers may not send, write or read messages

#12 Post by jdhurst » Thu Sep 25, 2008 8:19 pm

KristianJ wrote:<snip>
Exactly right - if one feels the urgency to respond to their text message tone or send one, pull over and do it. Simple, really...
I keep my Blackberry in its holster, so it has a really nifty feature: I cannot hear it at any speed faster than about 20Km per hour. If I am crawling or stopped, I may (or may not) answer. I am drifting toward never answering while driving. Nothing is that important.
... JDH

beGi
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 518
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 8:41 am
Location: Pag; Croatia

Re: California drivers may not send, write or read messages

#13 Post by beGi » Fri Sep 26, 2008 7:55 am

mattbiernat wrote:California drivers may not send, write or read messages on electronic devices
This is old news for most countries in Europe. I'm surprised that he didn't ban it sooner....

I wouldn't be surprised that in near future ALL comm devices in any form would be banned. Why? Lack of attention. I've read one research that concluded that it is not the problem when one-hand-on-the-wheel-is-missing, but the process of talking itself (via phone) is more than enough to cause accident. They concluded that there is no diference (in terms of attention and consequences) between talking&texting on cellphone (when one hand is on wheel) or when you talk via BT or speaker....

t20user
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 260
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 10:14 pm
Location: Chicago

#14 Post by t20user » Fri Sep 26, 2008 9:02 am

I was driving next to a guy yesterday who had his palms on the top of the steering wheel and his thumbs on the Blackberry. I guess its better than looking down, but he still looked like a mope seconds away from a wreck.

no_man
Sophomore Member
Posts: 128
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 11:41 am
Location: Cleveland, Ohio USA

UConnect coming soon

#15 Post by no_man » Fri Sep 26, 2008 11:35 am

yep, thats right, WIFI built into your vehicle: "Mopar's uconnect web is changing the way American families stay connected while on the road," said Sunil Lahoti, senior manager, Mopar marketing and brand strategy Chrysler, LLC.
laws to contain us? try again.

Toine
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 539
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 9:37 am
Location: Netherlands

#16 Post by Toine » Fri Sep 26, 2008 11:41 am

Here in The Netherlands every use of the mobile phone while driving is prohibited. For a couple of years actually
:shock:

ajkula66
SuperUserGeorge
SuperUserGeorge
Posts: 15740
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:28 am
Location: Brodheadsville, Pennsylvania

#17 Post by ajkula66 » Fri Sep 26, 2008 3:06 pm

Toine wrote:
Here in The Netherlands every use of the mobile phone while driving is prohibited. For a couple of years actually
As it should be everywhere in my opinion...people drive carelessly and are stressed out and dangerous enough behind the wheel without additional distractions...
...Knowledge is a deadly friend when no one sets the rules...(King Crimson)

Cheers,

George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)

AARP club members:A31p, T43pSF

Abused daily: T61p

PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.

Purcy
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 921
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: Pittsburgh PA, USA

#18 Post by Purcy » Fri Sep 26, 2008 3:09 pm

This thread has really brought me to vow never to answer my phone in the car. My DH actually pulls over or into a parking lot if one is near, to answer or make a call.
IBM T23 (2648-4NU) 1.13Ghz Pentium III, 1GB, 60GB 5400rpm, CD/DVD-RW, Internal Wireless, Windows XP Pro SP2 [DONOR]

Toine
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 539
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 9:37 am
Location: Netherlands

#19 Post by Toine » Fri Sep 26, 2008 5:32 pm

Since the law changed over here i have an Becker navigation systemen with handsfree builed into it in my car. Works really nice.
(talking to yourself in the car does look weird though),

mattbiernat
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1621
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 12:18 pm
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Re: California drivers may not send, write or read messages

#20 Post by mattbiernat » Fri Sep 26, 2008 8:45 pm

qviri wrote:
Voice dial.
can't voice dial all phone numbers. in some circumstances you need to use touchphone. my cell phone might be so cheap that it does not support voice dialing.

mattbiernat
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1621
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 12:18 pm
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Re: California drivers may not send, write or read messages

#21 Post by mattbiernat » Fri Sep 26, 2008 8:47 pm

KristianJ wrote:en the operators full attention. :banghead:
Exactly right - if one feels the urgency to respond to their text message tone or send one, pull over and do it. Simple, really...[/quote]
not that easy in california where you have a zillion of cars parked on the road or driving. pulling over can me extra 20 minutes.

ajkula66
SuperUserGeorge
SuperUserGeorge
Posts: 15740
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:28 am
Location: Brodheadsville, Pennsylvania

#22 Post by ajkula66 » Fri Sep 26, 2008 9:19 pm

mattbiernat wrote:
not that easy in california where you have a zillion of cars parked on the road or driving. pulling over can me extra 20 minutes.
If the person calling/texting you has an issue that can't wait for 20 minutes, they shouldn't be calling you, but 911. Seriously.
...Knowledge is a deadly friend when no one sets the rules...(King Crimson)

Cheers,

George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)

AARP club members:A31p, T43pSF

Abused daily: T61p

PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.

mattbiernat
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1621
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 12:18 pm
Location: Brooklyn, NY

#23 Post by mattbiernat » Fri Sep 26, 2008 9:41 pm

ajkula66 wrote: If the person calling/texting you has an issue that can't wait for 20 minutes, they shouldn't be calling you, but 911. Seriously.
its more like 90 minutes in L.A. traffic, and I love to use those minutes talking on the phone - now i have no choice but to text. last time i checked i was safer driver while talking on the phone and looking ahead of me. now i am not only distracted but also ain't looking at the street. i see now everybody in L.A. is texting. streets are not safer but more dangerous. oh and I got rear ended last month by a person who was texting. i wonder if she was actually talking on the phone and looking at my brake lights whether she would stop or not.

BeeJayEmm
Sophomore Member
Posts: 231
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 11:30 pm
Location: Detroit, Michigan

#24 Post by BeeJayEmm » Mon Sep 29, 2008 3:01 pm

mattbiernat wrote: its more like 90 minutes in L.A. traffic...
Better 90 minutes on the side of the road than all eternity in a pine box. Not to mention the other poor slob whose only mistake was to drive next to someone who thought that their time was more important than anyone else's life.
R52s 1849-ADU, -8DU and -4WU
R60 9456-01U

leoblob
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 762
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 2:47 pm
Location: Chicago IL USA

#25 Post by leoblob » Mon Sep 29, 2008 11:39 pm

Not sure I see the controversy here. It's dangerous to be on a cell phone when you're driving. I feel it's common sense, but I do believe there's been studies on driver concentration while on a cell phone, and it's not good.

In Chicago it's illegal. If the police see you with a cell phone to your ear you will get a ticket.

I say "good."

I can't tell you how many times I've had another driver blow thru a stop sign or make a turn right in front of me - narrowly missing me - and they're talking on their %&*^$# cell phone. Most of the time, they don't even realize they almost just hit someone.

Your call is not as important as my life.

If your time is so incredibly valuable that you truly really need to talk with someone RIGHT NOW, then pull over, stop your car, and make the call. How did the super-important people of the world possibly survive before the cell phone was invented?

EDIT: And if you're in heavy traffic and can't pull over... tough luck! Your call will have to wait until you can.
TP360 • TP365x • i1452 • TP T42 • Intellistation Z Pro

mattbiernat
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1621
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 12:18 pm
Location: Brooklyn, NY

#26 Post by mattbiernat » Tue Sep 30, 2008 12:22 am

BeeJayEmm wrote: Better 90 minutes on the side of the road than all eternity in a pine box.
and
leoblob wrote: Your call is not as important as my life.
i understand where you guys are coming from... i've seen really ugly and nasty driving from people who talked on their phone (didn't we all?). however i cannot understand how does driving 5 mph on a freeway/street is going to endanger anybody's life?

ajkula66
SuperUserGeorge
SuperUserGeorge
Posts: 15740
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:28 am
Location: Brodheadsville, Pennsylvania

#27 Post by ajkula66 » Tue Sep 30, 2008 9:08 am

mattbiernat wrote:
however i cannot understand how does driving 5 mph on a freeway/street is going to endanger anybody's life?
I assume that you've never been hit at that speed as a cyclist, biker or pedestrian. Under bad set of circumstances someone can get hurt/killed. And many people unfortunately share your misconception that nothing serious can happen at these speeds.
...Knowledge is a deadly friend when no one sets the rules...(King Crimson)

Cheers,

George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)

AARP club members:A31p, T43pSF

Abused daily: T61p

PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.

beGi
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 518
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 8:41 am
Location: Pag; Croatia

#28 Post by beGi » Tue Sep 30, 2008 9:25 am

ajkula66 wrote:mattbiernat wrote:
however i cannot understand how does driving 5 mph on a freeway/street is going to endanger anybody's life?
I assume that you've never been hit at that speed as a cyclist, biker or pedestrian. Under bad set of circumstances someone can get hurt/killed. And many people unfortunately share your misconception that nothing serious can happen at these speeds.
This is, unfortunately, true...

leoblob
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 762
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 2:47 pm
Location: Chicago IL USA

#29 Post by leoblob » Tue Sep 30, 2008 4:02 pm

I see the points above regarding the dangers of 5 MPH accidents. Never thought about that...

But even in a car-to-car crash at 5 MPH where there's no injuries of any kind, you can still end up with thousands of dollars of damage to your car.

bonestonne
Freshman Member
Posts: 103
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 2:07 pm
Location: Morristown, New Jersey
Contact:

#30 Post by bonestonne » Tue Sep 30, 2008 8:28 pm

using a phone while driving is like being 80+ years old or having 4 beers in you.

i dunno about all of you, but people at my house drive manual trans, i wouldn't even dream of having my phone on while the car is running.
Thinkpad T-22: 14.1" LCD, 900Mhz 20GB HDD, Linksys wifi adapter, Ubuntu 7.04, 512MB RAM
Apple Powerbook G4 Aluminum 15": 1.67GHz, 100GB HDD, Airport Extreme, Tiger 10.4.11, 2GB (bad RAM issue), Bluetooth, FW800, DVI

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Off-Topic Stuff”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests