x301 disappointing

X200, X201, X220 (including equivalent tablet models) and X300, X301 series specific matters only.
Message
Author
nxman
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 301
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 6:01 pm
Location: Kuwait City, Kuwait

#31 Post by nxman » Thu Dec 25, 2008 1:11 pm

No unfortunately mostly T & R latest is T61 however I'm shifting to the T500 soon hopefully it has a better screen :)

halrhp
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:55 pm
Location: Santa Cruz, CA

Re: x301 disappointing

#32 Post by halrhp » Sat Jan 17, 2009 11:21 am

Does anybody know anything about a X301 with an SL7200 processor?

Rich.Carpenter
Posts: 27
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: Fishers, IN

Re: x301 disappointing

#33 Post by Rich.Carpenter » Sun Feb 08, 2009 7:10 pm

The only reason I'm considering the X301 over the X200s is the 13.3" WXGA+ display option. I wish Lenovo and other manufacturers would provide more options with 13.3" displays.
Current notebook: T500....ThinkPads owned in the past: A20m | 570E | 600E

ThinkP
Posts: 31
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 7:21 pm
Location: Miami, Florida

Re: x301 disappointing

#34 Post by ThinkP » Fri Feb 13, 2009 2:58 pm

I hope they go with a faster processor from the SL series instead of the SU for the next revision of the x301/302

I noticed that the next iteration of the SU series is coming out slowly and Sony has adopted it already for the TT Vaio. You can pre-order the laptop on some sites already, hinting to an update anytime now.

look here

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B001O0DQ6K/ref ... nkCode=asn
current thinkpad model: T61p
previous thinkpads: 770, 365, 600, previous workstations: netvista 6792, currently still in use many IBM xSeries/eSeries servers 8500,6500,4500,205.

halrhp
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:55 pm
Location: Santa Cruz, CA

Re: x301 disappointing

#35 Post by halrhp » Fri Feb 13, 2009 3:25 pm

I don't know if it is possible to withdraw a question or post, but the query I posted about a SL 7200 processor was based on an incorrect identification of the processor in an X301 for sale on eBay. Sorry for the distraction or confusion I may have caused.

ThinkP
Posts: 31
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 7:21 pm
Location: Miami, Florida

Re: x301 disappointing

#36 Post by ThinkP » Fri Feb 13, 2009 3:39 pm

SL9600 = 2.13ghz, 6mb L2 cache, FSB 1066 mhz, 17w power draw.

SU9600 = 1.6ghz, 3mb L2 cache, FSB 800 mhz, 10w power draw.
(some say there's a 2.0ghz)

a 2.0 ghz SU9600 would be nice with faster cache and FSB without sacrificing battery time.
current thinkpad model: T61p
previous thinkpads: 770, 365, 600, previous workstations: netvista 6792, currently still in use many IBM xSeries/eSeries servers 8500,6500,4500,205.

Greg Gebhardt
thinkpads.com customer
thinkpads.com customer
Posts: 832
Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 6:29 pm
Location: Jacksonville, Florida

Re: x301 disappointing

#37 Post by Greg Gebhardt » Sat Feb 14, 2009 8:58 am

I am on my 2nd X301, my first had a little hesitation problem but my new X301 does not. I could not be more impressed with my latest as it has the best screen I have had in a while and has more than enough power to do CS4 and Office 2007 with ease.

I had gone back to another W500 but when the screen went bad, I sold it and went straight back to the X301. For it's size and weight, I have found no better. The biggest surprise is the screen, I find it sharp, bright and with enough resolution I do not need to do any scrolling under normal use. :lol:

I also found the Diskeeper Pro software with HyperFast DID indeed make my laptop more "responsive". After a week of use, I have no doubt it helped, though I do not know why. :banana:

I will be sticking with it till something better comes along.
Greg Gebhardt
Jacksonville, Florida

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “ThinkPad X200/201/220 and X300/301 Series”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests