Take a look at our
ThinkPads.com HOME PAGE
For those who might want to contribute to the blog, start here: Editors Alley Topic
Then contact Bill with a Private Message

How "future proof" is the W500?

W500/W510/W520 and W700/W701 Series
Post Reply
Message
Author
Lenovoate
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 5:51 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

How "future proof" is the W500?

#1 Post by Lenovoate » Mon Nov 10, 2008 3:44 am

Hi, I am looking to replace my t42 I've had for four great years with a w500.

I probably don't need all the power this machine provides, as I primarily use my laptop for basic functions like internet, Bittorrent, videos and gaming. But because I buy laptops so infrequently, I prefer to buy top performing machines that will last a long while. (thus I only consider Thinkpads. I also can't stand for touchpads, so I have little choice.)

I prefer the w500 to the t-series because it can display 1080p content, which I expect to be more available in the years ahead.

I don't care about the lack of blue-ray because I'm a streaming/BitTorrent guy anyway.

Not worried about storage because there's always external solutions.

I wonder if the (irreplaceable) graphics card will be able to play most games in say 3-4 years time.

I also wonder if I should add the Intel Turbo Boost now, or can I wait to get that later....(is it even worth it?)

Will wifi be obsolete in four years? WiMax?

Are there any other limitations I should be aware of that may arise in the next four-five years?

Thanks for your input!

comptiger5000
Sophomore Member
Posts: 184
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Stamford, CT

#2 Post by comptiger5000 » Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:15 am

Turbo memory is a waste, especially if you go for 4gb of RAM.
Thinkpad W500 4058-CTO
T9600 (2.8ghz), 4gb, 320gb 5400rpm, WUXGA, 9 Cell, Server 2008 x64

QFoam
Sophomore Member
Posts: 144
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 3:09 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Re: How "future proof" is the W500?

#3 Post by QFoam » Mon Nov 10, 2008 1:56 pm

Lenovoate wrote:Hi, I am looking to replace my ... with a w500... I primarily use my laptop for basic functions like internet, Bittorrent, videos and gaming... I prefer to buy top performing machines that will last a long while. (thus I only consider Thinkpads... I prefer the w500 to the t-series because it can display 1080p content... I wonder if the (irreplaceable) graphics card will be able to play most games in say 3-4 years time... Intel Turbo Boost... is it even worth it?)... Will wifi be obsolete in four years? WiMax? Are there any other limitations I should be aware of that may arise in the next four-five years?
Regarding futureproofing:


DISPLAY - You may find that 1920x1200 resolution is not that usable at 15.4". So try before you buy. Also, the 1920x1200 display on the W500 is not very bright:

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Review-Len ... 683.0.html

And CCFL-backlit displays become dimmer as they age. And the dimmer the display, the harder it will be for your eyes to distinguish those higher-resolution pixels. So it may not be the greatest solution from a futureproofing standpoint.


GRAPHICS PROCESSOR - The GPU in the W500 is a mid-range solution, having a 3DMark06 score of 4,693 when accompanied by a T9400 processor, as shown in the following translated review:

"Lenovo ThinkPad W500 - 2 full Centrino" - from xntb extra notebook

That's about the same as the new MacBook Pros, about the same as the mid-range NVidia Quadro FX 2700M option of the W700, and about half the score of the Quadro FX 3700M option of the W700. Given Moore's law, reasonably-priced processing power doubles every two years.

Also, the GPU drivers for the W500 are not optimized for games. They're optimized for workstation apps like AutoCAD, Photoshop, etc. Although you may be able to run hacked gaming-optimized drivers.


WIFI VS. WIMAX - WiMAX is not designed to replace WiFi. WiFi is short-range, WiMAX is city-wide. Current WiMAX business models (i.e., for the current Baltimore WiMAX network) charge for each device you connect to the network. So you may want to keep your home WiFi network. WiMAX is like cable in that nearby users share bandwidth, so expect the same trend of bandwidth-capping that you're currently seeing for cable internet. I have a section on my web page on adding your own internal WiMAX card, so that it uses the high-performing antennas that are already in your ThinkPad's display housing (at least for the W700, see below).


TURBO MEMORY - The above translated article says Turbo Memory provides a significant performance boost. Lenovo says it's incompatible with their current RAID drivers, and that it slows down solid-state drives (SSDs). You should be able to disable it if you add an SSD to your computer. I have Turbo Memory, and plan to provide some performance test results on my web page (see below).



AN ALTERNATE CHOICE - If you want a ThinkPad having a 1920x1200 display, then you may want to consider the following W700 sold via retail outlets. I've seen it sold for only about $400 more than what Lenovo's site charges for a similarly-configured W500.

It has a 17" 1920x1200 display having a brightness rating of 400 nits, which is twice as bright as the W500's display, and 1/3 brighter than what you need to view the display in direct sunlight. Because it's larger and brighter, the resolution is much more usable.

It has dual 160GB 7200 RPM drives configured as a RAID-0. So you get a 320GB drive with sustained transfer rates of approx. 100MB/sec. That's significantly faster than what comes with the W500, so that's futureproofing.

Its NVidia Quadro FX 2700M/512MB graphics processor is on a card, so as prices later drop, you may be able to replace it with the W700's twice-as-fast Quadro FX 3700M/1GB option, although I have not researched that possibility.

Its CPU is socketed, and the W700's cooling system is designed to handle Intel's new quad-core mobile processor. That processor has roughly twice the computing power of the T9400. Note that you get the same cooling system & power supply with the W700 no matter what CPU/GPU you order. So that's futureproofing.

Here it is (if you do a search on Google's froogle.com, for instance, you'll find these at various prices):

ThinkPad W700 (Mfg Part No. 27584SU)
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 2.8GHz 6MBL2
Windows Vista Business x64
17" WUXGA 1920x1200 400NIT display
Graphics Processor: nVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 512MB
4GB DDR3 RAM
1.3 Megapixel Integrated Camera
2 x 160GB 7200 RPM configured as RAID-0
DVD-Writer
Smart Card reader + Express Card (34mm)
Intel WiFi Link 5300 AGN
9-cell battery
One-year depot warranty (you can call Lenovo to purchase an extension)

NOTE: The above configuration does NOT include the built-in color calibrator or graphics tablet.


But then again, you're not looking for the color calibrator or graphics tablet. You're looking for a futureproof ThinkPad with a usable 1920x1200 display, so maybe it's worth the extra $400 or so over a W500.


Anyway, if you want more info on W700s in general, see my ThinkPad W700 Resources page. It also contains a lot of information relevant to the W500:

http://www.buy-a-thon.com/reviews/W700-resources.htm

It lists/describes 12 reviews of the W700 (I'm about to add the 13th), compares it with competing laptops, has links to performance comparisions of the available Centrino 2 processors, has links to performance comparisons of virtually every current mobile GPU on the market, talks about adding the Intel WiMAX card yourself to the W700, along with the pros and cons of that, plus lots of other things. It's basically 160 pages of notes I took while researching my W700 purchase, condensed down to one page of links. I plan to add some tests of Turbo Memory to the page soon, so subscribe to the page's RSS feed to be notified when I add that or anything else!

Good luck!
W700 T9600 @2.8GHz Vista64
8GBram 2GBTurbo 160GB+320GB @7.2k
17" 1920x1200 QuadroFX 3700M/1GB
Blu-ray Ultrabay
ThinkPad W700 Resources Page

bmn
BANNED
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 7:11 am
Location: New York City, New York

Re: How "future proof" is the W500?

#4 Post by bmn » Sat Nov 15, 2008 4:22 am

content deleted..
cheating is not tolerated..

Zender
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 315
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 8:34 pm
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Contact:

#5 Post by Zender » Sat Nov 15, 2008 4:48 am

Personally I doubt you can see a lot of difference between 1080p and 720p on a 15,4" display. The main reason of full HD resolution are large(r) display units, so I'd rather think whether and how to connect it to one. DisplayLink->DVI->HDMI perhaps or something.
T60 14" SXGA+ 9c T5600 3GB X1400 4965AGN MC8780 IR BT FPR DVDRW Alps XPP

comptiger5000
Sophomore Member
Posts: 184
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Stamford, CT

#6 Post by comptiger5000 » Sat Nov 15, 2008 8:35 am

BMN - the calibrator and tablet are OPTIONAL. They go into the palmrest if you spec them, but you can buy the machine without.
Thinkpad W500 4058-CTO
T9600 (2.8ghz), 4gb, 320gb 5400rpm, WUXGA, 9 Cell, Server 2008 x64

QFoam
Sophomore Member
Posts: 144
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 3:09 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Re: How "future proof" is the W500?

#7 Post by QFoam » Sat Nov 15, 2008 4:12 pm

bmn wrote:I had a question about one thing, however... I thought the calibrator and tablet was built into the palmrest, how is it not included here?
Like comptiger5000 said, it's an option. In fact, I just double-checked to make sure, and the tabook says that type-model 2758-4SU has no Wacom tablet.

In general, if you find a pre-configured ThinkPad offered by a store, and want to see exactly what features it has, just check its entry in Lenovo's tabook (a.k.a. "Personal Systems Reference: Lenovo ThinkPad Notebooks"):

ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/pc/pcinstitu ... tabook.pdf
W700 T9600 @2.8GHz Vista64
8GBram 2GBTurbo 160GB+320GB @7.2k
17" 1920x1200 QuadroFX 3700M/1GB
Blu-ray Ultrabay
ThinkPad W700 Resources Page

basketb
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1085
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 1:10 am
Location: California, USA

#8 Post by basketb » Sat Nov 15, 2008 5:33 pm

Zender wrote:Personally I doubt you can see a lot of difference between 1080p and 720p on a 15,4" display. The main reason of full HD resolution are large(r) display units, so I'd rather think whether and how to connect it to one. DisplayLink->DVI->HDMI perhaps or something.
It's all a matter of how far (or near) you are from your screen. If you are ten feet away, of course, you won't see a difference between 1080 and 720 on a 15" screen. But if you are fairly close (like one feet), the difference is obvious.

nykobing06
Freshman Member
Posts: 73
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 4:44 pm
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA

#9 Post by nykobing06 » Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:54 pm

The above long post says that the W500 isn't optimized for games....

I'm considering a T400, T500 or W500. The T-series are great but after a review of the T400's discrete graphics, I'm considering a better GPU model. This is with the intent of gaming in the future. If the above comment i true then the W-series is no longer an option.

I ask b/c in the thread discussing the T400's poor performance, there were multiple suggestions to go for a W-series for gaming-capable thinkpads.

The two reasons the T400/T500 is a toss up is LED backlighting and the T400's slightly inferior discrete GPU...im wondering how much better the T500's is.

Any and all help is appreciated. Thanks!

comptiger5000
Sophomore Member
Posts: 184
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Stamford, CT

#10 Post by comptiger5000 » Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:57 pm

Honestly, I game on my W500. Performance isn't bad at all, and probably similar to the T500. I went for the W500 for the WUXGA screen.
Thinkpad W500 4058-CTO
T9600 (2.8ghz), 4gb, 320gb 5400rpm, WUXGA, 9 Cell, Server 2008 x64

Pocket Aces
Sophomore Member
Posts: 245
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 5:37 am
Location: Glen Rock, NJ

#11 Post by Pocket Aces » Sun Nov 23, 2008 2:39 pm

Moore's Law states that the number of transistors doubles every eighteen months.
T42p - Pentium M 1.8Ghz, 1 GB RAM, 60 GB 7200 RPM, ATI Mobility FireGL T2 128MB
T61p - Core 2 Duo 7300, 3 GB RAM, 320 GB 7200 RPM, nVidia Quadro FX 570M 256MB

kev009
Sophomore Member
Posts: 145
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 10:12 pm
Location: Tempe, AZ
Contact:

#12 Post by kev009 » Sun Nov 30, 2008 4:27 am

Graphics are too weak on current T500/W500. I'm waiting for quadcore and more impressive graphics.
http://www.kev009.com/ - Blog
http://ps-2.kev009.com:8081/ - IBM Retro Archive

IBM ThinkPad T42, vintage 730TE, RS/6000 7006-42T, 7011-250, 7012-397, 7012-G40 (upgraded to 4x 200MHz PPC), xSeries rack servers, NetVista 2800
Sun Oracle Ultra 27 Xeon (i7) Quad Core 3.20GHz
SGI Fuel

Lenovoate
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 5:51 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

#13 Post by Lenovoate » Sat Dec 06, 2008 3:51 pm

nykobing06 wrote:The above long post says that the W500 isn't optimized for games....

I'm considering a T400, T500 or W500. The T-series are great but after a review of the T400's discrete graphics, I'm considering a better GPU model. This is with the intent of gaming in the future. If the above comment i true then the W-series is no longer an option.

I ask b/c in the thread discussing the T400's poor performance, there were multiple suggestions to go for a W-series for gaming-capable thinkpads.

The two reasons the T400/T500 is a toss up is LED backlighting and the T400's slightly inferior discrete GPU...im wondering how much better the T500's is.

Any and all help is appreciated. Thanks!
I've recently been doing research into the difference between t400' graphics and the t500.

The t500's card is WAY better. I can't remember where, but I found a chart comparing the performance of mobile graphics cards.

Sure enough the FireGl on the W-500 was about the same as the one on the T-500. But the T-400's performance was much worse.

It took me awhile to figure this out because I thought they had the same card until I looked real closely at Lenovo's website and saw that the t400 has an ATI 3470 and the t500 a 3650.

When I first read it I thought the difference between a 50 and a 70 wasn't much. Then I noticed the 3470 on the ATI was actually much worse because it was an earlier series.

Lenovoate
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 5:51 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

#14 Post by Lenovoate » Sat Dec 06, 2008 3:52 pm

comptiger5000 wrote:Honestly, I game on my W500. Performance isn't bad at all, and probably similar to the T500. I went for the W500 for the WUXGA screen.
How is the screen brightness. I've heard bad things, but I can't bear the thought of not viewing 1080p content in its native resolution.

Is it really dim?

comptiger5000
Sophomore Member
Posts: 184
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 5:00 pm
Location: Stamford, CT

#15 Post by comptiger5000 » Sat Dec 06, 2008 11:16 pm

The screen is plenty bright. I've yet to wish for brighter. Then again, I've yet to use it outdoors. In a well-lit room, it's just fine.
Thinkpad W500 4058-CTO
T9600 (2.8ghz), 4gb, 320gb 5400rpm, WUXGA, 9 Cell, Server 2008 x64

Proteus
Freshman Member
Posts: 89
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 3:18 pm

#16 Post by Proteus » Fri Dec 19, 2008 11:46 am

It will be completely obsolete within a year, when the new Nehalem core laptops ship....Unless my laptop was more than a year old, no way would I buy anything today. Nehalem is not an incremental upgrade..we're talking 40%-100% better performance, and lower power (32nm).

freakwave
Freshman Member
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 1:00 pm

#17 Post by freakwave » Fri Dec 19, 2008 12:15 pm

40-100% faster, you must be joking. Have you read the latest benchmarks of Nehalem processors? In some areas they are a bit faster (max 10%) and in some areas they are slower. Specifically in the multithreading area they are faster.

So if you are getting 20% with the next upgrade, that would be pretty good. Also many of these benchmarks already have been run with triple channel memory. It has to be be seen if we get3 sodimm slots in a notebook.

I think the biggest performance increase will come with the SSD drives. So if you want to your actual W500 to be fast, get a SSD. As soon as it is available I will test the solidata X1. I think this could be the next performance boost.
W520, 2820QM, Full HD, 16GB RAM, Intel S320 300GBytes, Windows 7 64 Enterprise

kev009
Sophomore Member
Posts: 145
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 10:12 pm
Location: Tempe, AZ
Contact:

#18 Post by kev009 » Fri Dec 26, 2008 8:10 pm

100% ack about SSDs for notebooks, but notebooks have traditionally had pitifully slow FSB and memory performance. Nehalem should give us a good boost in mobiles, probably a lot better than desktops saw.
http://www.kev009.com/ - Blog
http://ps-2.kev009.com:8081/ - IBM Retro Archive

IBM ThinkPad T42, vintage 730TE, RS/6000 7006-42T, 7011-250, 7012-397, 7012-G40 (upgraded to 4x 200MHz PPC), xSeries rack servers, NetVista 2800
Sun Oracle Ultra 27 Xeon (i7) Quad Core 3.20GHz
SGI Fuel

eecon
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 710
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 6:58 pm
Location: West Coast, USA

Re: How "future proof" is the W500?

#19 Post by eecon » Wed Jan 07, 2009 1:05 am

Lenovoate wrote:Hi, I am looking to replace my t42 I've had for four great years with a w500.
Wait about year if you can .... you'll be glad you did :thumbs-UP:
Two - T61p 15.4" WS T9300 2.5Ghz units, August 2008 08/08 Builds + Nvidia FX570M GPUs, One - T42 15" Flexview 1.8GHz + ATI GPU for travel, Two - T500 15.4" T9600 & T9400 CPUs with ATI HD3650 GPUs, One - Stupidly Fast W520 15.6" i7-2860QM + Nvidia 2000M GPU + Series 3 Dock w/USB 3.0

Schwaby
Posts: 27
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 7:56 am

Re: How "future proof" is the W500?

#20 Post by Schwaby » Fri Jan 30, 2009 10:24 pm

eecon wrote:Wait about year if you can .... you'll be glad you did :thumbs-UP:
Can you elaborate on this? I'm sort of in the same boat, looking to move up from my 4-year-old t42p sometime in the near future. I've ruled out the T400 due to the inferior graphics card and am looking at either the t500 or the w500. Will there be better revisions of the T/W series in the next year?

Thanks

eecon
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 710
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 6:58 pm
Location: West Coast, USA

Re: How "future proof" is the W500?

#21 Post by eecon » Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:37 pm

Schwaby wrote:Can you elaborate on this? I'm sort of in the same boat, looking to move up from my 4-year-old t42p sometime in the near future. I've ruled out the T400 due to the inferior graphics card and am looking at either the t500 or the w500. Will there be better revisions of the T/W series in the next year?
If the rumor that better gaming graphics does not pan-out in August for the T500/W500 series, at least prices will be down another 20% by then (just like all falling commodities prices).

If money is like no object and you do not care about gaming performance (i.e. no better than my T61p which scores 4400 on 3DMark06), then feel free to buy whenever you wish :thumbs-UP:
Two - T61p 15.4" WS T9300 2.5Ghz units, August 2008 08/08 Builds + Nvidia FX570M GPUs, One - T42 15" Flexview 1.8GHz + ATI GPU for travel, Two - T500 15.4" T9600 & T9400 CPUs with ATI HD3650 GPUs, One - Stupidly Fast W520 15.6" i7-2860QM + Nvidia 2000M GPU + Series 3 Dock w/USB 3.0

Schwaby
Posts: 27
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 7:56 am

Re: How "future proof" is the W500?

#22 Post by Schwaby » Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:54 pm

eecon wrote:]If the rumor that better gaming graphics does not pan-out in August for the T500/W500 series, at least prices will be down another 20% by then (just like all falling commodities prices).

If money is like no object and you do not care about gaming performance (i.e. no better than my T61p which scores 4400 on 3DMark06), then feel free to buy whenever you wish :thumbs-UP:
Okay thanks, I hadn't heard the rumor about those better graphics. I can afford to wait until later in the year if that's the case. This t42p I'm on is a champ

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “ThinkPad W500/W510/W520 and W700/W701 Series”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests