Any Word on Nehalem-based ThinkPads?
-
wswartzendruber
- Junior Member

- Posts: 377
- Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2005 10:33 am
- Location: Idaho, USA
Any Word on Nehalem-based ThinkPads?
Granted that the x00 series just came out not too long ago, but I'm wondering if anyone's heard anything.
Hopefully this next generation will be built like a tank.
* Fondly remembers the T60. *
The T400's light, and with a T61 keyboard it's actually pretty good, but the whole thing feels like a piece of paper, not to mention there's a little more flex.
Hopefully this next generation will be built like a tank.
* Fondly remembers the T60. *
The T400's light, and with a T61 keyboard it's actually pretty good, but the whole thing feels like a piece of paper, not to mention there's a little more flex.
Model: Lenovo ThinkPad T400
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 (2.26 GHz, 1067 MHz FSB, 3 MB L2 Cache)
RAM: 4 GB PC-8500 (1067 MHz, Dual-channel)
HDD: 500 GB, 54000 RPM
Audio: Conexant CX20561 (192 kHz, 24-bit)
Video: Intel GMA 4500MHD
Wireless: Intel 5300
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 (2.26 GHz, 1067 MHz FSB, 3 MB L2 Cache)
RAM: 4 GB PC-8500 (1067 MHz, Dual-channel)
HDD: 500 GB, 54000 RPM
Audio: Conexant CX20561 (192 kHz, 24-bit)
Video: Intel GMA 4500MHD
Wireless: Intel 5300
-
mattbiernat
- ThinkPadder

- Posts: 1621
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 12:18 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
Re: Any Word on Nehalem-based ThinkPads?
that's why i skipped the T series and got myself an X300. built like a rock.
-
wswartzendruber
- Junior Member

- Posts: 377
- Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2005 10:33 am
- Location: Idaho, USA
Re: Any Word on Nehalem-based ThinkPads?
While a slightly modified T400 is still awesome, I am a little disappointed in where it's gone. Still the best thing out there (once it's been refitted), but not quite the machine the T60 was. Don't even get me started on how much of a true ThinkPad the T60 was.mattbiernat wrote:that's why i skipped the T series and got myself an X300. built like a rock.
Model: Lenovo ThinkPad T400
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 (2.26 GHz, 1067 MHz FSB, 3 MB L2 Cache)
RAM: 4 GB PC-8500 (1067 MHz, Dual-channel)
HDD: 500 GB, 54000 RPM
Audio: Conexant CX20561 (192 kHz, 24-bit)
Video: Intel GMA 4500MHD
Wireless: Intel 5300
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 (2.26 GHz, 1067 MHz FSB, 3 MB L2 Cache)
RAM: 4 GB PC-8500 (1067 MHz, Dual-channel)
HDD: 500 GB, 54000 RPM
Audio: Conexant CX20561 (192 kHz, 24-bit)
Video: Intel GMA 4500MHD
Wireless: Intel 5300
-
mattbiernat
- ThinkPadder

- Posts: 1621
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 12:18 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
Re: Any Word on Nehalem-based ThinkPads?
- except for clicky, ugly silver buttonswswartzendruber wrote: Don't even get me started on how much of a true ThinkPad the T60 was.
- cheap and clicky touchpad buttons
- battery not sitting properly
- screen rattling
yes the T60 is extremly well build machine but not well polished out. the X300 has not only the original thinkpad appeariance (buttons, stripes, etc) but it is also well finished with all of its parts fitting each other and with little or not rattling. the T60 felt like it was a bunch of plastic put together with sticking out parts here and there. don't get me wrong the T60 is very reboust and strong machine but the X300 feels more like a well polished out thinkpad. it's like the T60 is a truck and X300 is a mercedes.
-
ajkula66
- SuperUserGeorge

- Posts: 15739
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:28 am
- Location: Brodheadsville, Pennsylvania
Re: Any Word on Nehalem-based ThinkPads?
Hmmmmmm...........
X300 is very pretty where T60 was an ugly duckling, especially coming after the drop-dead-gorgeous T4x series...
Having said that, I'd take a T60/p with an IPS LCD over X300 any day of the week...in that respect that was the last full-sized ThinkPad, and all the LCDs that we got over the last couple of years (including ones on widescreen T60/p) are downright garbage...
Although I see X300 as being one of the Lenovo's best moments (along with unappreciated Z series), it does have two major issues in my book:
a) The fact that it was never offered with a conventional HDD, thus being overpriced for what it really is
b) That the weak CPU is way beyond the rest of the machine, and probably remains its only real bottleneck
Lenovo has gotten several things right, judging by the newest generation of ThinkPads, but seems to be moving farther and farther away from the ThinkPad concepts of yesteryear...the new machines lack the prestige and identity of the old ones, and don't feel sturdy enough, regardless of how well they might be designed on the inside...
If T400 felt as "tight" as T40 when these were new, there wouldn't be much to complain about.
If W700 were offered with an IPS/AFFS LCD, be it a widescreen if must, I'd be typing on one right now...
If Lenovo manages to focus on aspects of ThinkPad range that could use improvement instead of fixing what was never broken in the first place (keyboards, LCDs, black being the only colour or close to it, depot service quality etc.) they still may drive the competition out of business, because the engineering excellence is still on their side...
My $0.02 only...
X300 is very pretty where T60 was an ugly duckling, especially coming after the drop-dead-gorgeous T4x series...
Having said that, I'd take a T60/p with an IPS LCD over X300 any day of the week...in that respect that was the last full-sized ThinkPad, and all the LCDs that we got over the last couple of years (including ones on widescreen T60/p) are downright garbage...
Although I see X300 as being one of the Lenovo's best moments (along with unappreciated Z series), it does have two major issues in my book:
a) The fact that it was never offered with a conventional HDD, thus being overpriced for what it really is
b) That the weak CPU is way beyond the rest of the machine, and probably remains its only real bottleneck
Lenovo has gotten several things right, judging by the newest generation of ThinkPads, but seems to be moving farther and farther away from the ThinkPad concepts of yesteryear...the new machines lack the prestige and identity of the old ones, and don't feel sturdy enough, regardless of how well they might be designed on the inside...
If T400 felt as "tight" as T40 when these were new, there wouldn't be much to complain about.
If W700 were offered with an IPS/AFFS LCD, be it a widescreen if must, I'd be typing on one right now...
If Lenovo manages to focus on aspects of ThinkPad range that could use improvement instead of fixing what was never broken in the first place (keyboards, LCDs, black being the only colour or close to it, depot service quality etc.) they still may drive the competition out of business, because the engineering excellence is still on their side...
My $0.02 only...
...Knowledge is a deadly friend when no one sets the rules...(King Crimson)
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
AARP club members:A31p, T43pSF
Abused daily: T61p
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
AARP club members:A31p, T43pSF
Abused daily: T61p
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
-
mattbiernat
- ThinkPadder

- Posts: 1621
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 12:18 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
Re: Any Word on Nehalem-based ThinkPads?
ajkula66 wrote: a) The fact that it was never offered with a conventional HDD, thus being overpriced for what it really is
b) That the weak CPU is way beyond the rest of the machine, and probably remains its only real bottleneck
i completely agree with you on point b. however i got my X300 for $1150 which was just about the same price that i got my T60 2.5 years before. and getting an SSD for such price was a deal that i could not say no to. of course the initial pricing was ridiculus and that's when they should have give an option for HDD. the x300 does feel a little bit fragile but not anywhere close to the T23. the T60 is of couse is a tank, and there is no comparison to it. you can't flex T60 unless you step on it (and you gotta be pretty heavy too!).
after watching this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8sOO-8LP4Eajkula66 wrote: If T400 felt as "tight" as T40 when these were new, there wouldn't be much to complain about.
and reading several other reviews i have decided that the T series became just another consumer laptop.
hopefully the next generation of Nehalem-based T series will see an improvement on the build quality.
Re: Any Word on Nehalem-based ThinkPads?
Nicemattbiernat wrote:it's like the T60 is a truck and X300 is a mercedes.
Nice link, but, wow, this T400 flexes even more than I thought my Z61p does... T400 is a nice combination of specs and form factor (even for me who doesn´t really like widescreens much anyway), I hope this flex is not a common issue with these machines.mattbiernat wrote: after watching this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8sOO-8LP4E
and reading several other reviews i have decided that the T series became just another consumer laptop.
IBM Lenovo Z61p | 15.4'' WUXGA | Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 2x 2.16GHz | 4 GB Kingston HyperX | Hitachi 7K500 500 GB + WD 1TB (USB) | ATI Mobility FireGL V5200 | ThinkPad Atheros a/b/g | Analog Devices AD1981HD | Win 7 x86 + ArchLinux 2009.08 x64 (number crunching)
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
32bit OS, and directx. Based on premise of old gaming.
by thinkpadcollection » Wed May 10, 2017 6:21 pm » in Off-Topic Stuff - 3 Replies
- 219 Views
-
Last post by theterminator93
Thu May 11, 2017 6:39 am
-
-
-
What operatings systems are y'all using on your vintage ThinkPads?
by goldeneagle » Thu Jan 05, 2017 4:00 pm » in ThinkPad Legacy Hardware - 15 Replies
- 2411 Views
-
Last post by w0qj
Sat Mar 11, 2017 9:12 am
-
-
-
What is a good Linux OS for legacy thinkpads?
by Blender » Sat Jan 07, 2017 1:47 am » in ThinkPad Legacy Hardware - 26 Replies
- 2629 Views
-
Last post by Farro
Thu Jan 19, 2017 11:55 am
-
-
-
Lenovo has trouble with English (ThinkPads Cheating Death)
by micrex22 » Sun Jan 08, 2017 12:14 am » in Off-Topic Stuff - 3 Replies
- 589 Views
-
Last post by MikalE
Sun Jan 08, 2017 9:20 am
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests





