Anyone expect one to pop up soon?
Maybe I ought to take the innards of a modern netbook and stuff it in a 240 shell... >_O XD



Have you looked at the new Sony netbook. It has a trackpoint (and it's red of all colors). Saw a pic of it on Engadget. Not quite sure when that netbook will make it to the US.rek wrote:
* why is nobody using a Trackpoint style pointer - even from manufacturers with this tech like Lenovo, Dell and Toshiba? Pointing sticks are the perfect solution for severly restricted form factors such as these..
(

The Wind 120 has 3G built in (using an Ericsson mini PCI-E card), and you can bet the other vendors will have 3G capable models in the works.rek wrote:* for supposed go-anywhere "net" books, the lack of integrated HSDPA modem options are a mystery.
http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/06/sony ... -revealed/Stargate199 wrote:
Have you looked at the new Sony netbook. It has a trackpoint (and it's red of all colors). Saw a pic of it on Engadget. Not quite sure when that netbook will make it to the US.
edit: Here is the post from engadget for that sony vaio netbook http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/28/is-this-the-vaio-p/




and a larger battery? (I think the only one available at present is 3cell)mattbiernat wrote:how about just add trackpoint to the S10 line....

oh wow. they improved it. Oh well, I think I'll be quite contented once I get my x31. I thought that the bevel thing was really cool and artistic. better than those screen bevels that are like one inch all around the screen or whatnot, but I can understand that not everybody would care for that look.OldManClayton wrote:You can get 6 cells. I wasn't so fond of the weird bezel on the s30, but I'd gladly take it.

Its not going to be a netbook then!felixgogo wrote:I meant to say to use the x60/x60s keyboard too, this item defining the minimum size of the netbook...


The problem is that there is lost of "stuff" hiding under the wrist area so they can't simply chop it off. In any case, the X61 is quite small as it is. I don't see the point of chopping an inch or two off the front. Besides I'd like to see the screen as large as possible and with as high a resolution as possible. The 1024x768 on the X61 is a large step, er, stumble, backwards compared to the 1600x1200 on the T6x series. (Not saying to put 1600x1200 on a netbook but maybe 1280x1024 or 1400x1050.)felixgogo wrote:Use the outgoing x60s motherboard... cast a new case, and you could end up with a netbook the same width as the old x60/X60s, but do away with the wristrest area...
As I understand it the TrackPoint is what distinguishes a genuine Thinkpad from other Lenovo products so they can't add it to an Ideapad. They would have to introduce something smaller than an X200/X300 price it competitively with other netbooks. One concern is doing so would cannibalize sales from X200/X300 which I imagine are far more profitable.mattbiernat wrote:how about just add trackpoint to the S10 line....

That's just playing semantics. A quite clear common enough consensus about the sort of things that make up a netbook has already emerged (and that includes price points), and what you have described doesn't fit the common usage.felixgogo wrote:The term 'Netbook' is not defined at all!
The X60 is a dead product, there are no longer "existing" production facilities of any sort for it.felixgogo wrote:Using existing X60 parts that can be built in existing factories on existing production lines would speed up construction

Personally, what I'd love to see is a 240Z with newer innards...1024x768 on a 10.4" is good enough for me...Regardless, another small thinkpad would be the greatest.

OldManClayton wrote:It's semantics on both sides.I wouldn't say that there's a common consensus with definite (or even close to definite) boundaries yet, at least not among people who are really computer knowledgeable.


Like beauty, that's in the eyes of the beholderOldManClayton wrote:the definite limits of a netbook's specs.


That's just the excutive summary of the report. The report does cover the topic of defining netbooks.OldManClayton wrote:Ok, but that doesn't say anything about the definite limits of a netbook's specs

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests