Switch from onboard graphics to plug-in graphics adapter?

R, A, G and Z series specific matters only
Post Reply
Message
Author
andregb1
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 12:21 pm
Location: Ellicott City, MD

Switch from onboard graphics to plug-in graphics adapter?

#1 Post by andregb1 » Tue Aug 04, 2009 11:42 am

Hello,

I have had an R61 for the last two years. It has served my well. When I ordered the laptop I got the model that used the onboard graphics chip (GM965). Lately I have been wishing I could upgrade the graphics capability by plugging in a high performance graphics card. Are the models that use the onboard graphics upgradable by plugging in a video adapter and then disabling the onboard graphics in the bios, or am I stuck with the graphics capability I have?

Thank you,
Bruce

Harryc
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 13228
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 8:23 am
Location: Upstate New York

Re: Switch from onboard graphics to plug-in graphics adapter?

#2 Post by Harryc » Tue Aug 04, 2009 11:55 am

You are stuck with what you have because the GPU (graphics chip) on most Thinkpads is soldered to the planar board (motherboard). If you want to replace the planar, then it is doable, but expensive.

yak
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1256
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 3:17 pm
Location: NRW, Germany

Re: Switch from onboard graphics to plug-in graphics adapter?

#3 Post by yak » Tue Aug 04, 2009 12:44 pm

As Harry said, you are stuck.

Just to clear out the terms a bit. Computers (desktop and notebooks) generally use two graphics options. Integrated into the chipset (less powerful) and a dedicated graphics chip (more powerful). The term "on-board graphics" is a bit confusing when used referring to a notebook because it comes from the desktop world where it describes the integrated option. It makes sense there because dedicated chips are found on add-on cards, as opposed to the motherboard itself.

In notebooks, both options are found on the motherboard and there is no add-on cards architecture. The term "on-board graphics" makes no sense here. Instead, we use "integrated graphics" and "dedicated graphics" terms.
:)
ThinkPad™ X201 / AFFS-120
i5-560M 2.67Ghz, 8GB RAM, Samsung 840 Pro 256GB SSD, Win 8 Pro 64-bit, UltraBase X200, ThinkPad Compact USB Keyboard,
Dell U2713HM (2560x1440, IPS), ExpressCard USB 3.0 (2 ports, flush), Nexus 7+10

andregb1
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 12:21 pm
Location: Ellicott City, MD

Re: Switch from onboard graphics to plug-in graphics adapter?

#4 Post by andregb1 » Tue Aug 04, 2009 2:46 pm

Thank you for the answer to my question as well as the clarification on laptop terminology

Regards,
Bruce

j00j4nt200
Posts: 24
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 7:36 am
Location: Novi Sad, Serbia

Re: Switch from onboard graphics to plug-in graphics adapter?

#5 Post by j00j4nt200 » Thu Aug 06, 2009 3:22 pm

yak wrote:As Harry said, you are stuck.

Just to clear out the terms a bit. Computers (desktop and notebooks) generally use two graphics options. Integrated into the chipset (less powerful) and a dedicated graphics chip (more powerful). The term "on-board graphics" is a bit confusing when used referring to a notebook because it comes from the desktop world where it describes the integrated option. It makes sense there because dedicated chips are found on add-on cards, as opposed to the motherboard itself.

In notebooks, both options are found on the motherboard and there is no add-on cards architecture. The term "on-board graphics" makes no sense here. Instead, we use "integrated graphics" and "dedicated graphics" terms.
:)
There is also third option: external graphics,
like Asus XG station, http://www.asus.com/product.aspx?P_ID=cjytZpI6lGKd6XX8
But since it uses Express card slot you are stuck.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “ThinkPad R, A, G and Z Series”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests