*P9500
*2GB ram
*160GB 7200rpm HD
*Windows XP
*Discreet graphics
*Wifi 5300
I just don't know if I have the confidence and the patience to order another T400.


Well, it's probably only a matter of time before Lenovo's Department of Customer Service recommends a clean install to resolve everything, including excess flex in the keyboard.dr_st wrote:It seems like a simple issue of bloatware. Clean installation of the operating system usually solves such problems...
Now that's a funny joke.stephens241 wrote:Lenovo's Department of Customer Service

Well, it's probably only a matter of time before Lenovo's Department of Customer Service recommends a clean install to resolve everything, including excess flex in the keyboard.
You should have seen the crazy things they made my tech-slow sister do when her T43 wouldn't connect to an wireless b network. Clean install, new HDD, rename drives (she had an H drive instead of C for some time), another clean install -- this went on for two months.stephens241 wrote:Lenovo's Department of Customer Service
Now that's a funny joke.![]()

You told us not so long ago that...CrazyJeeper wrote:This may be a rant...
Hope you didn't take my most recent "rant" personallybill bolton wrote: You told us not so long ago that...

If that's the worst customer service known to man, you really got to get out more.CrazyJeeper wrote:This may be a rant as I have probably experienced the worst customer service known to man.
In all fairness, what else could it be?FragrantHead wrote:Must be a software or hardware problem with the machine.
If there is SSD, then there shouldn't be a problem.jdhurst wrote:That the number of processes affects performance is a very popular myth. The number of processes affects memory, but has litttle impact on performance. I have 120 processes loaded and running in my Vista machine and it is as fast as greased lightning. One only has to understand what is being loaded at startup and then tuning those things. If something is never used, then by all means remove it.
... JDH

t140568 wrote:In all fairness, what else could it be?

Apple made significant screen changes in the last of the non-firewire MacBooks and the new MacBook Pro. My daughter has one of the very last non-Pro MacBooks and the screen is a night-and-day improvement over the washed-out panels that that model was initially shipped with. Her MacBook Screen isn't quite as nice as the MacBook Air's, but its very close.FragrantHead wrote:I have a Macbook 13", unibody, not the latest, but the last generation without the Firewire. If you're planning to use the built-in keyboard and screen, I do not recommend it. Screen has poor contrast and viewing angles; also only glossy / reflective was available. Bright and colorful, but the negatives outweigh the positives for me. The keyboard is just plain horrible, shallow, slippery with a crap feel to it and the lack of Home / End / Page Up / Page Down, but most importantly the Delete key (you have to use Fn-Backspace) will have you re-learning your habits. Only the trackpad is good, as trackpads go it's very good, but for me the pointing stick is still better, particularly for dragging where you don't run out of space and don't trigger an accidental drag-lock, which happens quite frequently with the trackpad.
If you do get the Mac, any of boot-camp or virtualisation solutions (Parallels, VMware) are relatively painless for new installs. On the other hand, should you wish, like me, to Ghost your old Thinkpad image onto it, that's very cumbersome. I had multiple partitions and getting them into boot-camp seemed next to impossible. I haven't managed it. As for the virtualisation solutions, there are migration solutions, which I haven't tried. I probably should have. I went the Ghost route instead and found, once I got my Ghost image into a disk image that Parallels / VMWare would recognize (an excercise in itself) that only VMware runs DOS programs at an acceptable speed. Ghosting 60GB in Parallels would have taken about 3 1/2 days, while VMWare took about 2 hours or so.
@ artic_squirrel , we don't refer to others here as 'moronic'. If I see you do this again it will be my personal pleasure to see to it that you are banned. - harryc.You can't blame a laptop for being slow on a fresh-manufactured software installation, especially if it is vista. Every decent man do a proper install of his beloved OS and choose his own softwares to install. I don't say that being slow for a brand new computer is not a shortcoming, I say it is moronic to say so when it is the first time you boot it up.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests