CCFL vs LED

T400/410/420 and T500/510/520 series specific matters only
Post Reply
Message
Author
Shahafg
Posts: 21
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:23 pm
Location: USA

CCFL vs LED

#1 Post by Shahafg » Thu Dec 24, 2009 10:46 am

just got a new t400 with sharp ccfl and i am not terribly impressed,

are the led any better, what are the positive/negative if any to ccfl

thanks
Q6600 2G Crucial Ballistix Tracer 1066
Desktop: P4 3.4Mhz; 2G Crucial Ballistix 667Mhz 3-3-3-8; 2x Raptor Raid 0;
Factory Overclocked XFX 7800 GTX 490/1300;2x Dell 24" 2405FPW;

IBM Z60M 2529GBU; Pentium M 2Mhz; 100GB HD; 1G Ram;
AtI x600 1680x1050

Puppy
Senior ThinkPadder
Senior ThinkPadder
Posts: 2264
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 4:52 am
Location: Prague, Czech Republic

Re: CCFL vs LED

#2 Post by Puppy » Fri Dec 25, 2009 8:25 am

It doesn't matter. You get horrible display notebook quality with both options these days. It is similar to lets say: would a display mounted with 12 screws have better display quality than a display mounted with 10 screws ? Probably not. The backlight technology (CCFL versus LED) is almost unimportant. The important is the technology which is in front of the backlight where you don't have any choices right now and you are forced to stick with completely outdated technology (TN) there. The "LED" word is just typical buzzword.
ThinkPad (1992 - 2012): R51, X31, X220, Tablet 8

Shahafg
Posts: 21
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:23 pm
Location: USA

Re: CCFL vs LED

#3 Post by Shahafg » Fri Dec 25, 2009 8:34 am

this how it seems man, been reading and there is nothing conclusive as far as energy/brightness/lifespan

i was wpndring if any of the service guys or someone like bill who saw the same configuration (apart from the diffrent screen) can make comments to which is better
Q6600 2G Crucial Ballistix Tracer 1066
Desktop: P4 3.4Mhz; 2G Crucial Ballistix 667Mhz 3-3-3-8; 2x Raptor Raid 0;
Factory Overclocked XFX 7800 GTX 490/1300;2x Dell 24" 2405FPW;

IBM Z60M 2529GBU; Pentium M 2Mhz; 100GB HD; 1G Ram;
AtI x600 1680x1050

Puppy
Senior ThinkPadder
Senior ThinkPadder
Posts: 2264
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 4:52 am
Location: Prague, Czech Republic

Re: CCFL vs LED

#4 Post by Puppy » Fri Dec 25, 2009 8:43 am

Depends on what parameter you consinder better. I'd guess that the CCFL one might be better because it is not that overbrighted so there might be some signs of contrast.
ThinkPad (1992 - 2012): R51, X31, X220, Tablet 8

Shahafg
Posts: 21
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:23 pm
Location: USA

Re: CCFL vs LED

#5 Post by Shahafg » Fri Dec 25, 2009 8:52 am

easy metrics will be battery life and brightness.

i am with you on the define better issue however we all have prefrences and things we like or not. one thing is for sure my ccfl is not impressive for color, contrast is optimal 4 bars away from full on room lighting, vertical veiwing angles are really bad, there is noticeable change in color and brightness with every 10 degrees. horizontal is not as bad but over 40 degrees its getting bad.

compared to my z60m this one is not too impressive to say the least.
Q6600 2G Crucial Ballistix Tracer 1066
Desktop: P4 3.4Mhz; 2G Crucial Ballistix 667Mhz 3-3-3-8; 2x Raptor Raid 0;
Factory Overclocked XFX 7800 GTX 490/1300;2x Dell 24" 2405FPW;

IBM Z60M 2529GBU; Pentium M 2Mhz; 100GB HD; 1G Ram;
AtI x600 1680x1050

Eudoxus
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 254
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 4:07 pm
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: CCFL vs LED

#6 Post by Eudoxus » Fri Dec 25, 2009 9:46 am

The only decent LCD panel (besides FlexView which I had not opporunity to try anyway) on ThinkPads I have seen was WSXGA+ 15." display on R61 I bought a couple of years ago. In fact I realized it after I bought a T61 with SXGA+ 14.1". In terms of LCD panels this was downgrade and not an upgrade as I thought. The contrast is poor and the picture is grainy; the viewing angles horrible to say the least. In comparison to that the screen on may R61 (which I sold to buy a T61) was really beautiful.
This is why I bought a T500 recently which (as I think) uses the same panel.

ThinkPad T500 (2242-CTO) P8600 / RAM 4GB / WSXGA+ / HDD Hitachi 7K320 320GB / 6 Cell Sony / Windows 8.1 Pro 64-bit
ThinkPad X61s (7669-3KG) / RAM 3GB/ HDD Fujitsu 7200rpm 160GB/ Windows 7 Home Premium 32-bit


ThinkPad Tablet 2 (3679-25G) / Windows 8.1 Pro

Past: T61 / R61 / R52 / 760E

Puppy
Senior ThinkPadder
Senior ThinkPadder
Posts: 2264
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 4:52 am
Location: Prague, Czech Republic

Re: CCFL vs LED

#7 Post by Puppy » Fri Dec 25, 2009 10:34 am

Eudoxus wrote:The only decent LCD panel (besides FlexView which I had not opporunity to try anyway) on ThinkPads I have seen was WSXGA+ 15." display on R61
Yep, the 15" WSXGA+ panel I've seen in T500 is probably (and sadly) the best option you can get now. The worst ever is the X301 one followed by T400s one.

As for the topic of this thread, the quality depends on the panel vendor. If there are lets say two vendors of TN + CCLF panel (call them A and B) and two of TN + LED panel (call them C and D), you can not make the desicion which is better just by inspecting the backlight type. The A could be better than C but D could be better than B.
ThinkPad (1992 - 2012): R51, X31, X220, Tablet 8

Shahafg
Posts: 21
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:23 pm
Location: USA

Re: CCFL vs LED

#8 Post by Shahafg » Fri Jan 08, 2010 11:02 pm

thank you for all the information, much appriciated
Q6600 2G Crucial Ballistix Tracer 1066
Desktop: P4 3.4Mhz; 2G Crucial Ballistix 667Mhz 3-3-3-8; 2x Raptor Raid 0;
Factory Overclocked XFX 7800 GTX 490/1300;2x Dell 24" 2405FPW;

IBM Z60M 2529GBU; Pentium M 2Mhz; 100GB HD; 1G Ram;
AtI x600 1680x1050

emeraldgirl08
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1759
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 6:59 pm
Location: Window Rock, Arizona

Re: CCFL vs LED

#9 Post by emeraldgirl08 » Fri Jan 08, 2010 11:58 pm

Puppy wrote:As for the topic of this thread, the quality depends on the panel vendor. If there are lets say two vendors of TN + CCLF panel (call them A and B) and two of TN + LED panel (call them C and D), you can not make the desicion which is better just by inspecting the backlight type. The A could be better than C but D could be better than B.
So true and definitely something that everyone should consider when buying a Thinkpad!
Thinkpad X230 | Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 | mATX Haswell Desktop

Weogo
Sophomore Member
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 11:27 pm
Location: Riceville, NC

Re: CCFL vs LED

#10 Post by Weogo » Sat Jan 09, 2010 5:34 pm

Hi Y'all,

CCFLs have Mercury in them.
What nasty materials are part of LED manufacturer I don't know.

CCLFs go dimmer much more quickly than LEDs.

I have been reading that LEDs change color value over time, and that a batch may not do so consistently, so color-balancing a screen lit by several LEDs may be iffy over time.
My guess is that as LEDs become more common, they will get higher production consistency.

LEDs can produce more light with less energy than CCFLs.
For high-quality light with a fairly balanced spectrum, the energy savings don't appear to be as big as some of the early LED claims said they would be.
Again, over time this will likely improve.

Long-term, I see LEDs as a better choice.

Good health, Weogo

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “ThinkPad T400/410/420 and T500/510/520 Series”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests