Why is my Exp. Rating lower than a lower end competition?

General Questions, Rumors, Real news & More
Message
Author
hyde
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 341
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 8:12 pm
Location: New York, NY

Re: Why is my Exp. Rating lower than a lower end competition?

#31 Post by hyde » Fri Aug 19, 2011 12:35 am

Thanks for the suggestion, it was always in Maximum Turbo.
At home, I tried Maximum Performance on Battery, and so far I did not have this problem.
Image
Google Maps scrolling constantly + youtube 1080p streaming buffering + WMP alx streaming, not a hiccup.

I will use the system in Maximum Performance in the office for a few days, plugged in, to see how well it does.
I can hear the fan spin much more in this power plan, though.
8/18/2011 - X220, Intel i5-2540M, 12.5" IPS, FingerPrint, Cam, BT, Intel 6205 Wifi, 8GB, U2312HM Mini Dock Plus 3
1/15/2012 - S405 (Wife's), AMD A6-4455M, 14", 4GB RAM, Windows 8
7/02/2015 - T450s Intel i5-5300U, 14" FHD IPS, FingerPrint, Cam, BT, SSD + M.2, Intel 7265, 12GB

hyde
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 341
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 8:12 pm
Location: New York, NY

Re: Why is my Exp. Rating lower than a lower end competition?

#32 Post by hyde » Fri Aug 19, 2011 7:03 pm

penartur wrote: Integrated GPU performance also depends on the RAM installed (since integrated GPU uses the system RAM).
For example, this is WEI index i got with a stock single 4GB stick:
http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/5013/239 ... b1eb3_orig
and this is what i'm getting now with 2*4GB
http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/5409/239 ... fd00a_orig
We have a winner, not that this was a competition or anything, but you were right on. :thumbs-UP:
Toshiba does in deed have a pair of 2GB modules.

Image

I read somewhere that 2x4GB Ram promotes throttling, is that really the case?
8/18/2011 - X220, Intel i5-2540M, 12.5" IPS, FingerPrint, Cam, BT, Intel 6205 Wifi, 8GB, U2312HM Mini Dock Plus 3
1/15/2012 - S405 (Wife's), AMD A6-4455M, 14", 4GB RAM, Windows 8
7/02/2015 - T450s Intel i5-5300U, 14" FHD IPS, FingerPrint, Cam, BT, SSD + M.2, Intel 7265, 12GB

penartur
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 442
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:05 am
Location: Russia, Moscow

Re: Why is my Exp. Rating lower than a lower end competition?

#33 Post by penartur » Sat Aug 20, 2011 5:04 am

hyde wrote:I read somewhere that 2x4GB Ram promotes throttling, is that really the case?
Yes, i heard of that; however, i never experienced any "throttling" myself. That said, i don't push the laptop too hard for too long.
Lifebook P1032 (1024*600 8.9") => Averatec AV1000 (WXGA 10.6") => Kohjinsha SH6 (1024*600 7.2") => Sharp M4000 (WXGA 13.3") => X200-AFFS, dead => X200s-AFFS, later -PVA => X220 4290RV5 + Intel 310 80GB, T420s 4173KSU + FHD IPS + Sandisk Z400s 128GB

hyde
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 341
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 8:12 pm
Location: New York, NY

Re: Why is my Exp. Rating lower than a lower end competition?

#34 Post by hyde » Sat Aug 20, 2011 11:07 pm

penartur wrote: Yes, i heard of that; however, i never experienced any "throttling" myself. That said, i don't push the laptop too hard for too long.
The problem with throttling is it happens regardless of user interaction. It just drops and gets stuck at lowest clock speed.
8/18/2011 - X220, Intel i5-2540M, 12.5" IPS, FingerPrint, Cam, BT, Intel 6205 Wifi, 8GB, U2312HM Mini Dock Plus 3
1/15/2012 - S405 (Wife's), AMD A6-4455M, 14", 4GB RAM, Windows 8
7/02/2015 - T450s Intel i5-5300U, 14" FHD IPS, FingerPrint, Cam, BT, SSD + M.2, Intel 7265, 12GB

bill bolton
Admin
Admin
Posts: 3848
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 10:09 am
Location: Sydney, Australia - Best Address on Earth!

Re: Why is my Exp. Rating lower than a lower end competition?

#35 Post by bill bolton » Sun Aug 21, 2011 9:26 pm

hyde wrote:It just drops and gets stuck at lowest clock speed.
Perma-throttling was addresed in the X220 v1.18 BIOS upgrade. There have been no further reports of Perma-throttling since that BIOS version was issued.

Cheers,

Bill B.

penartur
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 442
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:05 am
Location: Russia, Moscow

Re: Why is my Exp. Rating lower than a lower end competition?

#36 Post by penartur » Sun Aug 21, 2011 9:54 pm

hyde wrote:The problem with throttling is it happens regardless of user interaction. It just drops and gets stuck at lowest clock speed.
I heard that "it just drops" only after e.g. running stress-tests for an hour.
Lifebook P1032 (1024*600 8.9") => Averatec AV1000 (WXGA 10.6") => Kohjinsha SH6 (1024*600 7.2") => Sharp M4000 (WXGA 13.3") => X200-AFFS, dead => X200s-AFFS, later -PVA => X220 4290RV5 + Intel 310 80GB, T420s 4173KSU + FHD IPS + Sandisk Z400s 128GB

hyde
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 341
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 8:12 pm
Location: New York, NY

Re: Why is my Exp. Rating lower than a lower end competition?

#37 Post by hyde » Sun Aug 21, 2011 10:24 pm

Thanks. Knock on wood, it has been running great today. I really have no idea what was causing the slowdown to overall performance.
There is still scrolling problem with the animation & graphic-intense web pages but I tested in few other systems, it is the same case.

I think running on maximum performance surely helps.
However, I was not able to run PCmark benchmark on my laptop, and I started a thread about it under the category, but so far no response. Has anyone ever been able to run PC Mark on it?
I just wanted to compare the score to the scores posted in reviews.
8/18/2011 - X220, Intel i5-2540M, 12.5" IPS, FingerPrint, Cam, BT, Intel 6205 Wifi, 8GB, U2312HM Mini Dock Plus 3
1/15/2012 - S405 (Wife's), AMD A6-4455M, 14", 4GB RAM, Windows 8
7/02/2015 - T450s Intel i5-5300U, 14" FHD IPS, FingerPrint, Cam, BT, SSD + M.2, Intel 7265, 12GB

jdrou
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 583
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 6:15 pm
Location: Madison Heights, MI

Re: Why is my Exp. Rating lower than a lower end competition?

#38 Post by jdrou » Mon Aug 22, 2011 3:26 pm

hyde wrote:Updated to .2342 and it is still reading 4.7, but now Gaming Graphics score went down to 6.1
I noticed this on my X201 as well; build 2342 (and 2361 from Intel) lower the gaming score from 5.2 to 3.9. I don't see any drop in 3DMark scores though.
Current Thinkpads:
X31, X40, X61T, X61, X201, X220 (i7 IPS), W520 (2720QM/2000M/FHD), T440p (i7-4800MQ/GF730GT/FHD)
Dells: Latitude C840, Precision M70, Precision M4400, M6400 (WUXGA), M6600, M6700
Daily driver: Dell XPS 13 w/Kaby Lake+Iris Pro+TB3

hyde
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 341
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 8:12 pm
Location: New York, NY

Re: Why is my Exp. Rating lower than a lower end competition?

#39 Post by hyde » Mon Aug 22, 2011 3:30 pm

Thanks for the input,
jdrou, did you try to get PC Mark to run on your Thinkpad? I tried every other way, result is "cannot gather system information".. and I got no score.
8/18/2011 - X220, Intel i5-2540M, 12.5" IPS, FingerPrint, Cam, BT, Intel 6205 Wifi, 8GB, U2312HM Mini Dock Plus 3
1/15/2012 - S405 (Wife's), AMD A6-4455M, 14", 4GB RAM, Windows 8
7/02/2015 - T450s Intel i5-5300U, 14" FHD IPS, FingerPrint, Cam, BT, SSD + M.2, Intel 7265, 12GB

jdrou
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 583
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 6:15 pm
Location: Madison Heights, MI

Re: Why is my Exp. Rating lower than a lower end competition?

#40 Post by jdrou » Mon Aug 22, 2011 5:07 pm

hyde wrote:Thanks for the input,
jdrou, did you try to get PC Mark to run on your Thinkpad? I tried every other way, result is "cannot gather system information".. and I got no score.
Haven't tried PCMark but 3DMark Vantage ran OK (with external monitor). Make sure you've got the latest version.
Current Thinkpads:
X31, X40, X61T, X61, X201, X220 (i7 IPS), W520 (2720QM/2000M/FHD), T440p (i7-4800MQ/GF730GT/FHD)
Dells: Latitude C840, Precision M70, Precision M4400, M6400 (WUXGA), M6600, M6700
Daily driver: Dell XPS 13 w/Kaby Lake+Iris Pro+TB3

hyde
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 341
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 8:12 pm
Location: New York, NY

Re: Why is my Exp. Rating lower than a lower end competition?

#41 Post by hyde » Wed Dec 07, 2011 1:53 am

hyde wrote:
<quote from penartur's post>
Integrated GPU performance also depends on the RAM installed (since integrated GPU uses the system RAM).
For example, this is WEI index i got with a stock single 4GB stick:

http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/5013/239 ... b1eb3_orig
and this is what i'm getting now with 2*4GB
http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/5409/239 ... fd00a_orig
<end quote>

We have a winner, not that this was a competition or anything, but you were right on. :thumbs-UP:
Toshiba does in deed have a pair of 2GB modules.

Image

OK, fast forward a few months, I upgraded from 1x4GB to 2x4GB sticks, yet, there is no difference in Graphics rating, in fact it shows lower:
3D is set to Quality and Graphics Power Plan is set to maximum performance in Intel Graphics Control Panel.
Image

When I slid the dial to Performance instead of Quality in 3D, I get this:
Image

I do not consider penartur's Disk Data Transfer rate since he has SSD. Either way, I wanted to update everyone that even with 2x4GB banks, I am still lower in experience rating than my cousin's 2x2GB Toshiba..
8/18/2011 - X220, Intel i5-2540M, 12.5" IPS, FingerPrint, Cam, BT, Intel 6205 Wifi, 8GB, U2312HM Mini Dock Plus 3
1/15/2012 - S405 (Wife's), AMD A6-4455M, 14", 4GB RAM, Windows 8
7/02/2015 - T450s Intel i5-5300U, 14" FHD IPS, FingerPrint, Cam, BT, SSD + M.2, Intel 7265, 12GB

craigmontHunter
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 742
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:25 pm
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Re: Why is my Exp. Rating lower than a lower end competition?

#42 Post by craigmontHunter » Wed Dec 07, 2011 9:25 am

I agree with Bill on this - on my T61 the WEI score went up when I upgraded to 2 sticks of ram vs. one - I don't think it is really anything to be concerned with anyway, as long as it works.

and the missing memory may be the way that the bios allocated ram to the video card - I think lenovo's give it at "harder" low limit- while the toshiba may allow the video memory to range from 8mb - whatever, (then showing up as 4gb useable ram) lenovo limits it's minimum to ~160 so that there is always enough to run the modern graphics, aero... all I know is that both my thinkpad and Thinkcentre have the same behaviour, and ultimately I would call lenovo's choice better, so that the required graphics memory is not allocated elsewhere.

EDIT - somehow I missed the last 3 or 4 posts :oops: - I don't think the WEI score is really anything to worry about, but it may be that lenovo has further customized their driver for better stability than performance, which would make sense considering the general demographics that would use either system. If you really want, uninstall the lenovo drivers and try the test with the generic intel ones; that *should* give the performance boost you are looking for.
Elitebook 8440p, i5 520, 8gb, Samsung 840 SSD
Old/Not Working/Dead Laptops:
T61 7661CC2, 4gb, Windows 7 x64, 240gb intel SSD, 500gb Ultrabay drive
Toshiba Portege 7020ct
Thinkpad T41 23737FU
Dell Latitude LS

hyde
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 341
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 8:12 pm
Location: New York, NY

Re: Why is my Exp. Rating lower than a lower end competition?

#43 Post by hyde » Wed Dec 07, 2011 11:50 am

craigmontHunter, I am not worried about the score, rather worried about the underlying reasons, especially after upgrading to a memory that's double Toshiba's. I know the scores don't mean much when you have a stable operation, but if there is anything else causing lower score, I would want to find out. Maybe there is a bottleneck somewhere? Who knows.

Even with 8GB and 3D set to performance, I am still having hard time scrolling up and down on animated-image-heavy web pages. The problem occurs only with scroll wheel.
8/18/2011 - X220, Intel i5-2540M, 12.5" IPS, FingerPrint, Cam, BT, Intel 6205 Wifi, 8GB, U2312HM Mini Dock Plus 3
1/15/2012 - S405 (Wife's), AMD A6-4455M, 14", 4GB RAM, Windows 8
7/02/2015 - T450s Intel i5-5300U, 14" FHD IPS, FingerPrint, Cam, BT, SSD + M.2, Intel 7265, 12GB

penartur
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 442
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:05 am
Location: Russia, Moscow

Re: Why is my Exp. Rating lower than a lower end competition?

#44 Post by penartur » Thu Dec 08, 2011 7:55 am

hyde wrote:OK, fast forward a few months, I upgraded from 1x4GB to 2x4GB sticks, yet, there is no difference in Graphics rating, in fact it shows lower:
Did you re-ran the WEI assessment?
Make sure your memory works in a dual-channel mode (you can check it e.g. on "Memory" tab in CPU-Z).
Lifebook P1032 (1024*600 8.9") => Averatec AV1000 (WXGA 10.6") => Kohjinsha SH6 (1024*600 7.2") => Sharp M4000 (WXGA 13.3") => X200-AFFS, dead => X200s-AFFS, later -PVA => X220 4290RV5 + Intel 310 80GB, T420s 4173KSU + FHD IPS + Sandisk Z400s 128GB

hyde
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 341
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 8:12 pm
Location: New York, NY

Re: Why is my Exp. Rating lower than a lower end competition?

#45 Post by hyde » Thu Dec 08, 2011 1:28 pm

penartur wrote: Did you re-ran the WEI assessment?
Make sure your memory works in a dual-channel mode (you can check it e.g. on "Memory" tab in CPU-Z).
Yep I did. Took a while and results were as above. You can see the Memory section went up from 5 to 7.5 but graphics did not improve much. I guess it has something to do with the Lenovo set the graphics memory channeling from RAM to 3D or display.

Image
8/18/2011 - X220, Intel i5-2540M, 12.5" IPS, FingerPrint, Cam, BT, Intel 6205 Wifi, 8GB, U2312HM Mini Dock Plus 3
1/15/2012 - S405 (Wife's), AMD A6-4455M, 14", 4GB RAM, Windows 8
7/02/2015 - T450s Intel i5-5300U, 14" FHD IPS, FingerPrint, Cam, BT, SSD + M.2, Intel 7265, 12GB

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “GENERAL ThinkPad News/Comments & Questions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests