FireGL T2 vs. Mobility 9600 64MB -- Game performance?
-
vageetasjn
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 9:18 pm
- Location: New York
FireGL T2 vs. Mobility 9600 64MB -- Game performance?
How do these compare with regard to game performance -- is there a noticeable difference? Do they operate at different mem/core clocks? I read one review where the reviewer stated that the FireGL T2 did not have a performance edge over the 64MB 9600. Does this hold any truth? Is it worth the extra cost if I won't be doing CAD work?
Thanks
Thanks
The fire gl is better, although you won't want to show off either one of them at a lan party. I think if you want to go up to the t43p, you ought to check out the v3200, which is based on the x600 ati, and should be the fastest out of the four.
T43p 2687EJU, 512+512 ram, 2ghz, 15 in UXGA, V3200, MultiBurn, ect.
-
vageetasjn
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 9:18 pm
- Location: New York
Where are the OpenGL drivers? Will these work with a standard 9600?Leon wrote:Only diff is drivers (which you can install if you want), which are CAD optimized and video memory.
See FAQ in my signature for programs that need OpenGL.
X201s: 1440x900 LED backlit 2.13 GHz, 8 GB, 160 GB Intel X25-M Gen 2 SSD, 6200 a/b/g/n, BT, 6-cell, 9-cell, Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1, Verizon 4G LTE USB modem, USB 2.0 external optical drive, Lenovo USB to DVI converter
Previous Models: A21p, A30p, A31p, T42, X41T, X60s, X61s, X200s
Previous Models: A21p, A30p, A31p, T42, X41T, X60s, X61s, X200s
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
T420: mSATA SSD performance issue [SOLVED]
by Farro » Tue Mar 07, 2017 3:56 am » in ThinkPad T400/410/420 and T500/510/520 Series - 2 Replies
- 994 Views
-
Last post by jaspen-meyer
Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:00 pm
-
-
- 4 Replies
- 1005 Views
-
Last post by serpico
Thu Apr 13, 2017 3:27 pm
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests





