Installed memory v. power draw
-
krosenstein
- Sophomore Member
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 12:54 am
- Location: USA
Installed memory v. power draw
Does anyone know if an increase in memory will draw more power from the battery? Will a 512 mb draw more than a 256 mb? Will 2 sticks draw more than 1? If so, is there any info on how much.
i bet the answer is definitely no
i know very little about electronics, electrical engineering, computers, and computer technology. However, I would quite easily bet quite a lot that the answer to your first three questions is No. Also, even if the answer turns out to be Yes, I would quite easily bet quite a lot that any additional power used by any additional ram memory is far less than any additional power used to access the hard drive or virtual memory in the absence of needed ram. in my ignorance, i bet that there is no practical reason to worry about additional power needed to use additional memory, unless such memory usage and power consumption is going to lead you to run different kinds of software - and i've never heard of such a thing.
Technically yes. Practically no. And here's proof:
When you put your Tpad on standby, the only thing (besides some wake-up circuitry) that should remain powered is your memory. I have 1GB in mine, and it drains less than 1% of the battery per hour. If you assume power consumption vs. amount of RAM to be linear, then an additional 512 MB of RAM would technically drain your battery less than 1% over 2 hours and less than 2% over 4 hours.
Four hours is bordering on your maximum battery life. Therefore, in the time it takes you to run down your entire battery, that extra 512 MB of RAM would cost you less than 2%, leaving 98% of the consumption for the other major power hogs
- processor (cpu, graphics)
- fan
- display
- hdd
- wireless
- cdrom
The numbers I used are probably conservative. If I had to bet, the RAM power consumption is actually less than that.
When you put your Tpad on standby, the only thing (besides some wake-up circuitry) that should remain powered is your memory. I have 1GB in mine, and it drains less than 1% of the battery per hour. If you assume power consumption vs. amount of RAM to be linear, then an additional 512 MB of RAM would technically drain your battery less than 1% over 2 hours and less than 2% over 4 hours.
Four hours is bordering on your maximum battery life. Therefore, in the time it takes you to run down your entire battery, that extra 512 MB of RAM would cost you less than 2%, leaving 98% of the consumption for the other major power hogs
- processor (cpu, graphics)
- fan
- display
- hdd
- wireless
- cdrom
The numbers I used are probably conservative. If I had to bet, the RAM power consumption is actually less than that.
-
Guest
Now that I think about this, what I said was probably a gross oversimplification. It probably depends a the RAM technology and how much of it is being actively accessed - although I believe the RAM these days is dynamic, meaning all of the RAM gets refreshed whether it is used or not.
Anyways, if I had to guess, I would still say that the power consumption due to the RAM would be very very small. Somebody could do a benchmark, but the power consumption due to the RAM would probably be overshadowed by other variables.
Anyways, if I had to guess, I would still say that the power consumption due to the RAM would be very very small. Somebody could do a benchmark, but the power consumption due to the RAM would probably be overshadowed by other variables.
-
Ghostrider
- Freshman Member
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 4:42 pm
- Location: Germany
I'd like to add my 2cents...
Yes, an additional memory module will require some power.
And what the others already said: The reduction of HDD-activity cause by the additional memory may cause an increased time on batteries. This won't be true if you just switch on the notebook and don't touch it until it's empty because this would be not memory limited.
Nevertheless I'd not expect any big differences in battery life.
Yes, an additional memory module will require some power.
And what the others already said: The reduction of HDD-activity cause by the additional memory may cause an increased time on batteries. This won't be true if you just switch on the notebook and don't touch it until it's empty because this would be not memory limited.
Nevertheless I'd not expect any big differences in battery life.
Regards,
Ghostrider
Ghostrider
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
Can Windows Vista be installed on an IBM Thinkpad R50e?
by ThinkDan2004 » Sat Jun 03, 2017 3:54 pm » in ThinkPad R, A, G and Z Series - 14 Replies
- 518 Views
-
Last post by ThinkDan2004
Tue Jun 13, 2017 3:06 pm
-
-
-
T420 Upgrade Options for CPU/Memory
by Farro » Tue Jan 24, 2017 4:19 am » in ThinkPad T400/410/420 and T500/510/520 Series - 8 Replies
- 1854 Views
-
Last post by jaspen-meyer
Tue Feb 28, 2017 8:32 am
-
-
-
X230 Users...my X230 doesn't like my 16gb G.Skill memory kit
by mr.rhtuner » Sat Mar 18, 2017 8:00 pm » in ThinkPad X230 and later Series - 14 Replies
- 1166 Views
-
Last post by Frenel
Sun May 21, 2017 12:28 pm
-
-
-
SD ram card as extended memory vs. SSD allocation
by D L Davis » Thu Mar 30, 2017 9:34 pm » in ThinkPad W500/510/520 and W7x0 Series - 11 Replies
- 1192 Views
-
Last post by Cigarguy
Thu Apr 06, 2017 7:03 pm
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests



