visionviper wrote:Ok, let me ask you this then. Why did you pick the x100e over all the other laptops that have the same processor? The x100 is more expensive than all of them. They all more or less have the same hardware on the inside. The MSI one even has HDMI out, whereas the x100 doesn't have any sort of digital output. The ASUS and MSI ones also have a bigger screen. All of them also come with more ram and a bigger hard drive than the cheapest x100.
So why did you spend more than what was necessary?
By saying I don't want to spend more than necessary, I don't mean I would contemplate a paper sack in which to carry my computer (it's a bag, right?). I mean that I don't want to spend more than necessary for a bag that offers the features I need.
So, applying those ideas to my recent laptop choice, my choice makes sense. Processor speed is not a major determining factor for me, since I need to do office-type work and am not a video gamer (the sole exception to this is photo processing, for which I still have an older T60 and a T61). Since I do a lot of typing, I wanted a laptop with a functionally excellent keyboard. Since I do a lot of looking at a screen, I wanted something with a decent resolution for the size, good brightness, and a matte finish. I wanted something small, to fit in my work bag. I wanted something with enterprise-level support. I didn't want to spend a bundle. Etc. etc. etc. I made a choice I have turned out to like very much, as this little machine meets my needs quite well.
Until I see some evidence to the contrary, I simply don't believe that most people would wear out something like the LNEO-12. If they don't wear it out, there is no
actual wear-based advantage to something like a Westerfield bag that allegedly, in the eyes of its devotees, wears better. I would also submit that simply lumping in something like the LNEO-12 with all the "off brands" in an attempt to prop up Westerfield bags isn't very convincing to me. Is there evidence this specific bag doesn't wear well?