Recently, I learned that STN and TFT screens use different polarizing films. Curious, I decided to experiment with an old STN LCD from a 330Cs. What if I replaced the polarizing film with a standard one (possibly from a TN panel)? So here is pictures:
the old 330cs screen

I removed a part of the front polarizer film, and put a normal one in front of the screen. Looks not bad?


OK then, I just removed them all, and applied a whole front polarizing film. This is the (almost) "white" background

and this is how command.com, command line screen, looks like

one more picture...

Apparently it's a bad idea to use the normal one which only gives you yellowish screen. And in fact, there was discussions on the "extra" retarder film that helps to adjust the color. For me, I just have no idea why the FSTN film is way more expensive than the normal ones, sometimes you can even get a new LCD assembly with that money. I ordered one for 330Cs, which cost only ~70 bucks. And it's even cheaper for some more common seen DSTN/FSTN LCDs, making me feel like it's not worth fixing the old one.
Another laptop I'd keep (but STN one) is the PC110. Fortunately, Kevin made the TFT replacement for it.






















