criminal identity theft ring - spyware story

Talk about "WhatEVER !"..
Post Reply
Message
Author
ibmuser
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 271
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 9:56 pm
Location: Victoria (Canada)

criminal identity theft ring - spyware story

#1 Post by ibmuser » Sun Aug 07, 2005 1:51 pm

rather interesting story from arstechnica:

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20050805-5175.html

Edited by Moderator: Moved to Off-Topic from Windows OS.
ThinkPad X31 2672-C2U

pphilipko
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 631
Joined: Sat May 22, 2004 10:32 am
Location: Philadelphia

#2 Post by pphilipko » Sun Aug 07, 2005 3:43 pm

My hands are already shaking.
Phil
IBM X40, 2371-AV0
Lenovo T61, 6458-AB1
En route: X61t

dummkopf
Posts: 41
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 4:41 pm

#3 Post by dummkopf » Mon Aug 08, 2005 8:10 am

There have been predictions things like this will happen. Security experts are very concerned about increasing involvement of hitech hackers in writing malware. What once was a playland for irresponsible students is becoming dead serious business. Thanks, ibmuser. This is the passing bell for last networked Windows in my household (in my wife's PC).

carbon_unit
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 2988
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 9:10 pm
Location: South Central Iowa, USA

#4 Post by carbon_unit » Mon Aug 08, 2005 8:59 am

That makes my Linux give me a warm and fuzzy feeling. :D
T60 2623-D7U, 3 GB Ram.
Dual boot XP and Linux Mint.
Registered linux user #160145

Toe
Freshman Member
Posts: 110
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 3:34 pm
Location: PA,USA
Contact:

#5 Post by Toe » Mon Aug 08, 2005 9:36 am

I HATE SPYWARE!!!!!

(of course, as an IT guy...I clean it off of other peoples' computers more than my own)

-Toe

dummkopf
Posts: 41
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 4:41 pm

#6 Post by dummkopf » Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:09 am

Toe wrote:I HATE SPYWARE!!!!!
Very same here. And sometimes I've got the feeling those people who say: "You think your Windows is clean? Think again" may be right after all...

leoblob
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 762
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 2:47 pm
Location: Chicago IL USA

#7 Post by leoblob » Mon Aug 08, 2005 5:22 pm

dummkopf wrote:What once was a playland for irresponsible students is becoming dead serious business.
This is what makes this situation so incredibly dangerous! I guess I'm naïve if I think that my software firewall and my anti-spyware programs will have any effect on this...???
TP360 • TP365x • i1452 • TP T42 • Intellistation Z Pro

dummkopf
Posts: 41
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 4:41 pm

Windows security

#8 Post by dummkopf » Mon Aug 08, 2005 6:09 pm

I could write a few pages on subject. Smarter men than me could write books. But who reads them? Usually people who need it most never do. For instance, how many Windows (home) users out there are using a restricted account for everyday computing? Tell them they should do it. Configure their PC's with separate administrator account. A couple of months/weeks/days later you are going to find some smart alec is given admin rights to all users. Period.
Initiative has to come from Redmond, it's their duty not to let incompetent users make their system vulnerable. But Redmond is interested in profits, and harder-to-use Windows would frighten away customers.

dummkopf
Posts: 41
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 4:41 pm

#9 Post by dummkopf » Mon Aug 08, 2005 7:33 pm

leoblob wrote:This is what makes this situation so incredibly dangerous! I guess I'm naïve if I think that my software firewall and my anti-spyware programs will have any effect on this...???
Sorry, I wanted to answer this question but something distracted me and I got carried away. I think this question is best answered by
Mr. Freund, the CEO of Zone Labs:
And the problem is, even if just a couple of guys who do it as a proof-of-concept, that spreads to the guys who might have much, much different kinds of motivation. Frankly, if you have a piece of malicious code running in the kernel, you've already lost the battle. Once in the kernel, there's no security model any more. If it's running as a device driver in the core of the operating system, at least in theory, it might become almost impossible to remove those unless you resort to [methods] beyond the reach of most users.

jdhurst
Admin
Admin
Posts: 5831
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 6:49 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

#10 Post by jdhurst » Mon Aug 08, 2005 9:31 pm

The newest paid version of Ad-Aware and the newest version (3.0.1) of Symantec Client Security catches just about everything. I don't see anything running that should not be. Somewhere else I noted, and it applies in spades here: Don't do silly things and don't go to bad places on the internet. Honestly if you don't know precisely and exactly what you are doing, don't even download anything from the internet - silly thing to do. ... JD Hurst

ibmuser
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 271
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 9:56 pm
Location: Victoria (Canada)

#11 Post by ibmuser » Tue Aug 09, 2005 10:10 am

jdhurst wrote:The newest paid version of Ad-Aware and the newest version (3.0.1) of Symantec Client Security catches just about everything. I don't see anything running that should not be. Somewhere else I noted, and it applies in spades here: Don't do silly things and don't go to bad places on the internet. Honestly if you don't know precisely and exactly what you are doing, don't even download anything from the internet - silly thing to do. ... JD Hurst
RIght you are JD. Still, for those that want to be double sure, CWShredder might be worth running:

http://www.intermute.com/spysubtract/cw ... nload.html
ThinkPad X31 2672-C2U

dummkopf
Posts: 41
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 4:41 pm

#12 Post by dummkopf » Tue Aug 09, 2005 11:17 am

Uh. This is a long row of don't-s.
Don't:
use MS Java,
surf with IE,
receive mails with OE,
go to malicious web sites,
download unknown crap,
accept suspicious sertificates,
execute funny programs,
don't...
Gentlemen, do you consider this normal life? Is this your vision of taking advantage on newest technologies of 21st century?
Then you pay $$$ for spyware and virus blockers and think you are safe. All these measures can take care of something known. Anything new comes thru these filters until they are discovered and added to those evergrowing databases. BTW, MS does not trust it's users and Windows has built-in feature to hide running processes even from administrator.
Come down to earth and you'll see with these security measures you are always a step behind. :(

jdhurst
Admin
Admin
Posts: 5831
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 6:49 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

#13 Post by jdhurst » Tue Aug 09, 2005 11:50 am

dummkopf wrote:Uh. This is a long row of don't-s.
Don't:
use MS Java,
surf with IE,
receive mails with OE,
go to malicious web sites,
download unknown crap,
accept suspicious sertificates,
execute funny programs,
don't...
Gentlemen, do you consider this normal life? Is this your vision of taking advantage on newest technologies of 21st century?
Then you pay $$$ for spyware and virus blockers and think you are safe. All these measures can take care of something known. Anything new comes thru these filters until they are discovered and added to those evergrowing databases. BTW, MS does not trust it's users and Windows has built-in feature to hide running processes even from administrator.
Come down to earth and you'll see with these security measures you are always a step behind. :(
I use SUN Java, I use Internet Explorer, I use Outlook 2003, I don't go to malicious web site, download crap, accept suspicious things or whatever. I use SpamAssassin to nuke well over 99 percent of mail threats, and the Mail Call to scan for the little remaining and delete before using a Mail program. I pay $ (not $$$) for protection - it is cheap and worth the effort. There are other tools to look at Windows besides Windows tools.

Common sense is more important than suggesting we have already been compromised when (at least in my case) I know I haven't been. Your points are noted, but one can still be safe if one tries. ... JD Hurst

dummkopf
Posts: 41
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 4:41 pm

#14 Post by dummkopf » Wed Aug 10, 2005 6:15 am

From today's news
The firm [MS] has promised that Vista will take what for Microsoft is a completely new approach to computing, with security not an add-on but an integral part of the operating system.
I was aware they plan to use *NIX permissions system on Vista, now it seems they may have copied *NIX security model too. Good luck, Microsoft.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Off-Topic Stuff”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest