Hello,
What are the disadvantages of Undervolting the CPU and/or Underclocking the GPU ?
If you think there are none, why wouldn't IBM/Lenovo implement the same utilities as a standard part of the product, and thereby be able to boast longer battery life and lower temperatures ?
Undervolting (and underclocking) - Disadvantages ??
Undervolting (and underclocking) - Disadvantages ??
- Ken Stuart
T40 (2373-12U) 1.3ghz, 1.5gb, 40gb5k80, 14"XGA, 2200bg, 9-cell, Infocase
600X (2645-5EU) 500mhz, 320mb, 10gb, 13"XGA
T40 (2373-12U) 1.3ghz, 1.5gb, 40gb5k80, 14"XGA, 2200bg, 9-cell, Infocase
600X (2645-5EU) 500mhz, 320mb, 10gb, 13"XGA
-
christopher_wolf
- Special Member
- Posts: 5741
- Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 1:24 pm
- Location: UC Berkeley, California
- Contact:
With undervolting, you can go below a certian voltage for a given clock; this can lead to the system becoming highly unstable. With underclocking, there is a harder limit. Namely the lowest clock multiplier you can set. On the T43, you can go as low as 800Mhz, on the T4{2, 1, 0} you can go to 600Mhz. You get as slower response from the CPU. In addition, undervolting is a touchy proposition if you do not stress test your system afterwards. For example, under a light load, you may not notice any problems; after, however, you have started the CPU intensive program your system will become unstable very quickly. Intel also gives you free range to clock down its chispets via SpeedStep and whatnot, undervolting and going as low as you can go basicallygive you a little more of an edge; yet it isn't something that IBM/Lenovo is going to rush to implement on top of the power managers that they already ship with the ThinkPads. 
IBM ThinkPad T43 Model 2668-72U 14.1" SXGA+ 1GB |IBM 701c
~o/
I met someone who looks a lot like you.
She does the things you do.
But she is an IBM.
/~o ---ELO from "Yours Truly 2059"
~o/
I met someone who looks a lot like you.
She does the things you do.
But she is an IBM.
/~o ---ELO from "Yours Truly 2059"
Just to add on:christopher_wolf wrote:With undervolting, you can go below a certian voltage for a given clock; this can lead to the system becoming highly unstable. With underclocking, there is a harder limit. Namely the lowest clock multiplier you can set. On the T43, you can go as low as 800Mhz, on the T4{2, 1, 0} you can go to 600Mhz. You get as slower response from the CPU. In addition, undervolting is a touchy proposition if you do not stress test your system afterwards. For example, under a light load, you may not notice any problems; after, however, you have started the CPU intensive program your system will become unstable very quickly. Intel also gives you free range to clock down its chispets via SpeedStep and whatnot, undervolting and going as low as you can go basicallygive you a little more of an edge; yet it isn't something that IBM/Lenovo is going to rush to implement on top of the power managers that they already ship with the ThinkPads.
It would definitely be difficult for Lenovo to implement undervolting for each Thinkpad out of the box, as different CPUs (different clockspeeds, different batches) have different undervolting thresholds.
Don't think they'll go to the limit of individually stress-testing each CPU one by one.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 4 Replies
- 1429 Views
-
Last post by kfzhu1229
Thu Feb 09, 2017 6:38 pm
-
-
Undervolting CPU in Windows 8 / 10 ? RMclock doesn't work any more.
by zoltan87 » Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:26 am » in ThinkPad T6x Series - 6 Replies
- 2463 Views
-
Last post by lab
Sat Mar 18, 2017 11:55 am
-
-
- 23 Replies
- 1301 Views
-
Last post by Thinkpad4by3
Tue May 02, 2017 8:18 am
-
-
Mxing wireless clients, AC and N, 3x3 and 2x2
by hhhd1 » Tue May 30, 2017 4:37 pm » in GENERAL ThinkPad News/Comments & Questions - 0 Replies
- 95 Views
-
Last post by hhhd1
Tue May 30, 2017 4:37 pm
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests



