Undervolting (and underclocking) - Disadvantages ??

Work/comment area for scripts and utilities like TP Fan, 2-finger scrolling, etc
Post Reply
Message
Author
kstuart
Sophomore Member
Posts: 246
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 4:33 pm
Location: Northern California

Undervolting (and underclocking) - Disadvantages ??

#1 Post by kstuart » Tue Aug 22, 2006 8:52 pm

Hello,

What are the disadvantages of Undervolting the CPU and/or Underclocking the GPU ?

If you think there are none, why wouldn't IBM/Lenovo implement the same utilities as a standard part of the product, and thereby be able to boast longer battery life and lower temperatures ?
- Ken Stuart

T40 (2373-12U) 1.3ghz, 1.5gb, 40gb5k80, 14"XGA, 2200bg, 9-cell, Infocase
600X (2645-5EU) 500mhz, 320mb, 10gb, 13"XGA

christopher_wolf
Special Member
Posts: 5741
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 1:24 pm
Location: UC Berkeley, California
Contact:

#2 Post by christopher_wolf » Tue Aug 22, 2006 11:01 pm

With undervolting, you can go below a certian voltage for a given clock; this can lead to the system becoming highly unstable. With underclocking, there is a harder limit. Namely the lowest clock multiplier you can set. On the T43, you can go as low as 800Mhz, on the T4{2, 1, 0} you can go to 600Mhz. You get as slower response from the CPU. In addition, undervolting is a touchy proposition if you do not stress test your system afterwards. For example, under a light load, you may not notice any problems; after, however, you have started the CPU intensive program your system will become unstable very quickly. Intel also gives you free range to clock down its chispets via SpeedStep and whatnot, undervolting and going as low as you can go basicallygive you a little more of an edge; yet it isn't something that IBM/Lenovo is going to rush to implement on top of the power managers that they already ship with the ThinkPads. :)
IBM ThinkPad T43 Model 2668-72U 14.1" SXGA+ 1GB |IBM 701c

~o/
I met someone who looks a lot like you.
She does the things you do.
But she is an IBM.
/~o ---ELO from "Yours Truly 2059"

borez
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 5:55 am
Location: Singapore

#3 Post by borez » Wed Aug 30, 2006 8:33 pm

christopher_wolf wrote:With undervolting, you can go below a certian voltage for a given clock; this can lead to the system becoming highly unstable. With underclocking, there is a harder limit. Namely the lowest clock multiplier you can set. On the T43, you can go as low as 800Mhz, on the T4{2, 1, 0} you can go to 600Mhz. You get as slower response from the CPU. In addition, undervolting is a touchy proposition if you do not stress test your system afterwards. For example, under a light load, you may not notice any problems; after, however, you have started the CPU intensive program your system will become unstable very quickly. Intel also gives you free range to clock down its chispets via SpeedStep and whatnot, undervolting and going as low as you can go basicallygive you a little more of an edge; yet it isn't something that IBM/Lenovo is going to rush to implement on top of the power managers that they already ship with the ThinkPads. :)
Just to add on:

It would definitely be difficult for Lenovo to implement undervolting for each Thinkpad out of the box, as different CPUs (different clockspeeds, different batches) have different undervolting thresholds.

Don't think they'll go to the limit of individually stress-testing each CPU one by one. :)

kstuart
Sophomore Member
Posts: 246
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 4:33 pm
Location: Northern California

#4 Post by kstuart » Wed Aug 30, 2006 8:55 pm

Isn't there an undervolting threshold that one could consider safe without having to do stress testing (i.e. a lesser amount of undervolting) ?
- Ken Stuart

T40 (2373-12U) 1.3ghz, 1.5gb, 40gb5k80, 14"XGA, 2200bg, 9-cell, Infocase
600X (2645-5EU) 500mhz, 320mb, 10gb, 13"XGA

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “ThinkPad Utility Work Area”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests