On the left:
T70
i7-7820HQ 4cores, 8 thresds, 2,9-3,9GHz
16 Gb of Hynix DDR4
256Gb NVMe SSD from Samsung
1600x1200 Boe-Hydis UXGA
W10pro
13.01.2018 BIOS
All the rest is very classic thingy
On the right:
T601p
P9600 (should and will be X9100)
8Gb of matched DDR2
240Gb of GOODRAM SSD
fx570m w/128Mb; board with full Penryn support (native)
ex-factory LED Hydis UXGA
https://www.flickr.com/photos/138318840 ... res/S82635
On full brightness:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/138318840 ... res/F5379m
I was running this T601p for quite a while, and was extremely pleased with it - keybard quality, display... and the system was very responsive with SSD, nice CPU and 8gigs of RAM. The thingy, I was not happy with the battery life, heat and general push-up performance, plus there was a last chance to get a T70 - since this is the _LAST_ unit from the _LAST_ batch. There are no more of them, and - as I've be informed - there are no plans of launching another batch.
I did a quick test of both units, and am a bit surprised with the output I've got!
1. Performance.
Honestly, in general use (office, web, video, light gaming) apart from the ABSURDLY fast NVMe SSD there is no great difference. When it comes to demanding apps, Solidworks, Matlab, gaming, i7 uncovers its power. Intel 630hd also surprisingly does the job well.
2. Battery life.
One of the most important points for me - and I was a bit disappointed that T70 offers... almost same battery life as T601 w/power hungry fx570m!. I have tested both on new SANYO batteries, both 95000mWh (ok, one is 94996, and another is 950094). Here's what I've got:
- IDLE - T70 ate ~14000mW, T601 ~13500mW
- LIGHT LOAD (typing, surfing) - T70 ~24000mW, T601 ~33mW
- FULL LOAD (gaming) - T70 ~44000mW (with turbo boost) ~40000mW (turbo boost disabled), T601 ~46000mW.
NOTE: T70 has a CCFL screen, and T601 has a LED. I have successfully undervolted T70 by 0,11V, and fx570m on T601 works on 1,1V. After transplanting LED display to T70 I would expect better battery life on T70, and when I figure out how to underclock Kaby Lake, this should go down as well. Tuning will possibly work wonders.
3. Heat.
Another thing that surprised me a bit. Being used to T601 means being used to 75C under load, jumping to lower 80s when ambient is high (remember: GPU is undervolted!). T70 has presented me with... thermal shutdown after 10 minutes of test. Yup, over 100C, at two cores.
After undervolting a stress test w/ turbo enabled produced no more than 92C. Still a whopping whole lot of a heat! With no to light load it runs cool - very cool in fact; at around 40C, but the fan is all the time on.
T601 is equipped with 3-heatpipe, rare fan unit from T61p, and after testing a Noctua NT-H1 thermal compount produced best temps.
T70 is equipped with semi-stock (provided by 51nb) fan from T500, and Arctic NX4 turned out to work best on it.
Arctic Silver 5, Noctua NT-H1, Thermal Grizzly Cryonaut and Arctic NX4 were tested on all of those.
Well now, some - completely subjective - pros and cons of T70 compared to an old good frankie. Have in mind that this is only mine point of view, and some of the points may be useless for one while important for another.
PROS:
- FAST
- will keep up to date for many years (if the product lifetime is long enough)
- four (4) storage options, with 2x NVMe, 1x SATA-3, and one bay SATA option
- should have a better battery life when tuned properly
CONS:
- losing all the Lenovo software, incl. power manager
- not all conectors fit on their holes well
- some keys do not work as they are expected, bluetooth light is always off, fan is always on, only SATA devices allowable at ultrabay etc.
- this thing runs hot when under load
- no docking port
Special thanks for not disturbing to this guy while I was writing this small review.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/138318840 ... res/o60mZE







